Reducing Biases towards Minoritized Populations in Medical Curricular Content via Artificial Intelligence for Fairer Health Outcomes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12680v1
• Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 04:11:18 GMT
• Title: Reducing Biases towards Minoritized Populations in Medical Curricular Content via Artificial Intelligence for Fairer Health Outcomes
• Authors: Chiman Salavati, Shannon Song, Willmar Sosa Diaz, Scott A. Hale, Roberto E. Montenegro, Fabricio Murai, Shiri Dori-Hacohen,
• Abstract summary: We introduce BRICC, a firstin-class initiative that seeks to mitigate medical bisinformation using machine learning. A gold-standard BRICC dataset was developed throughout several years, and contains over 12K pages of instructional materials. Medical experts meticulously annotated these documents for bias according to comprehensive coding guidelines.
• Score: 8.976475688579221
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Biased information (recently termed bisinformation) continues to be taught in medical curricula, often long after having been debunked. In this paper, we introduce BRICC, a firstin-class initiative that seeks to mitigate medical bisinformation using machine learning to systematically identify and flag text with potential biases, for subsequent review in an expert-in-the-loop fashion, thus greatly accelerating an otherwise labor-intensive process. A gold-standard BRICC dataset was developed throughout several years, and contains over 12K pages of instructional materials. Medical experts meticulously annotated these documents for bias according to comprehensive coding guidelines, emphasizing gender, sex, age, geography, ethnicity, and race. Using this labeled dataset, we trained, validated, and tested medical bias classifiers. We test three classifier approaches: a binary type-specific classifier, a general bias classifier; an ensemble combining bias type-specific classifiers independently-trained; and a multitask learning (MTL) model tasked with predicting both general and type-specific biases. While MTL led to some improvement on race bias detection in terms of F1-score, it did not outperform binary classifiers trained specifically on each task. On general bias detection, the binary classifier achieves up to 0.923 of AUC, a 27.8% improvement over the baseline. This work lays the foundations for debiasing medical curricula by exploring a novel dataset and evaluating different training model strategies. Hence, it offers new pathways for more nuanced and effective mitigation of bisinformation.

Related papers

• DCAST: Diverse Class-Aware Self-Training Mitigates Selection Bias for Fairer Learning [0.0]
  bias unascribed to sensitive features is challenging to identify and typically goes undiagnosed. Strategies to mitigate unidentified bias and evaluate mitigation methods are crucially needed, yet remain underexplored. We introduce Diverse Class-Aware Self-Training (DCAST), model-agnostic mitigation aware of class-specific bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T09:26:19Z)
• Towards Fairer Health Recommendations: finding informative unbiased samples via Word Sense Disambiguation [3.328297368052458]
  We tackle bias detection in medical curricula using NLP models, including LLMs. We evaluate them on a gold standard dataset containing 4,105 excerpts annotated by medical experts for bias from a large corpus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T17:10:20Z)
• Memory Consistency Guided Divide-and-Conquer Learning for Generalized Category Discovery [56.172872410834664]
  Generalized category discovery (GCD) aims at addressing a more realistic and challenging setting of semi-supervised learning. We propose a Memory Consistency guided Divide-and-conquer Learning framework (MCDL) Our method outperforms state-of-the-art models by a large margin on both seen and unseen classes of the generic image recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T09:39:45Z)
• Medical Image Debiasing by Learning Adaptive Agreement from a Biased Council [8.530912655468645]
  Deep learning could be prone to learning shortcuts raised by dataset bias. Despite its significance, there is a dearth of research in the medical image classification domain to address dataset bias. This paper proposes learning Adaptive Agreement from a Biased Council (Ada-ABC), a debiasing framework that does not rely on explicit bias labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T06:29:52Z)
• Blueprinting the Future: Automatic Item Categorization using Hierarchical Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Classifiers [6.907552533477328]
  This study unveils a novel approach employing the zero-shot and few-shot Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) for hierarchical item categorization. The hierarchical nature of examination blueprints is navigated seamlessly, allowing for a tiered classification of items across multiple levels. An initial simulation with artificial data demonstrates the efficacy of this method, achieving an average accuracy of 92.91% measured by the F1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T15:51:49Z)
• Causality and Independence Enhancement for Biased Node Classification [56.38828085943763]
  We propose a novel Causality and Independence Enhancement (CIE) framework, applicable to various graph neural networks (GNNs) Our approach estimates causal and spurious features at the node representation level and mitigates the influence of spurious correlations. Our approach CIE not only significantly enhances the performance of GNNs but outperforms state-of-the-art debiased node classification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T13:56:24Z)
• Pseudo Bias-Balanced Learning for Debiased Chest X-ray Classification [57.53567756716656]
  We study the problem of developing debiased chest X-ray diagnosis models without knowing exactly the bias labels. We propose a novel algorithm, pseudo bias-balanced learning, which first captures and predicts per-sample bias labels. Our proposed method achieved consistent improvements over other state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-18T11:02:18Z)
• Relieving Long-tailed Instance Segmentation via Pairwise Class Balance [85.53585498649252]
  Long-tailed instance segmentation is a challenging task due to the extreme imbalance of training samples among classes. It causes severe biases of the head classes (with majority samples) against the tailed ones. We propose a novel Pairwise Class Balance (PCB) method, built upon a confusion matrix which is updated during training to accumulate the ongoing prediction preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T07:48:36Z)
• Interpretable bias mitigation for textual data: Reducing gender bias in patient notes while maintaining classification performance [0.11545092788508224]
  We identify and remove gendered language from two clinical-note datasets. We show minimal degradation in health condition classification tasks for low- to medium-levels of bias removal via data augmentation. This work outlines an interpretable approach for using data augmentation to identify and reduce the potential for bias in natural language processing pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T03:09:30Z)
• Estimating and Improving Fairness with Adversarial Learning [65.99330614802388]
  We propose an adversarial multi-task training strategy to simultaneously mitigate and detect bias in the deep learning-based medical image analysis system. Specifically, we propose to add a discrimination module against bias and a critical module that predicts unfairness within the base classification model. We evaluate our framework on a large-scale public-available skin lesion dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-07T03:10:32Z)
• Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifier [76.52804102765931]
  We show that neural networks learn to rely on spurious correlation only when it is "easier" to learn than the desired knowledge. We propose a failure-based debiasing scheme by training a pair of neural networks simultaneously. Our method significantly improves the training of the network against various types of biases in both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-06T07:20:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.