A3Rank: Augmentation Alignment Analysis for Prioritizing Overconfident Failing Samples for Deep Learning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14114v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 08:32:10 GMT
• Title: A3Rank: Augmentation Alignment Analysis for Prioritizing Overconfident Failing Samples for Deep Learning Models
• Authors: Zhengyuan Wei, Haipeng Wang, Qilin Zhou, W. K. Chan,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel test case prioritization technique with augmentation alignment analysis. $A3$Rank can effectively rank failing samples escaping from the checking of confidence-based rejectors. We also provide a framework to construct a detector devoted to augmenting these rejectors to defend these failing samples.
• Score: 2.6499018693213316
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Sharpening deep learning models by training them with examples close to the decision boundary is a well-known best practice. Nonetheless, these models are still error-prone in producing predictions. In practice, the inference of the deep learning models in many application systems is guarded by a rejector, such as a confidence-based rejector, to filter out samples with insufficient prediction confidence. Such confidence-based rejectors cannot effectively guard against failing samples with high confidence. Existing test case prioritization techniques effectively distinguish confusing samples from confident samples to identify failing samples among the confusing ones, yet prioritizing the failing ones high among many confident ones is challenging. In this paper, we propose $A^3$Rank, a novel test case prioritization technique with augmentation alignment analysis, to address this problem. $A^3$Rank generates augmented versions of each test case and assesses the extent of the prediction result for the test case misaligned with these of the augmented versions and vice versa. Our experiment shows that $A^3$Rank can effectively rank failing samples escaping from the checking of confidence-based rejectors, which significantly outperforms the peer techniques by 163.63\% in the detection ratio of top-ranked samples. We also provide a framework to construct a detector devoted to augmenting these rejectors to defend these failing samples, and our detector can achieve a significantly higher defense success rate.

Related papers

• Typicalness-Aware Learning for Failure Detection [26.23185979968123]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) often suffer from the overconfidence issue, where incorrect predictions are made with high confidence scores. We propose a novel approach called Typicalness-Aware Learning (TAL) to address this issue and improve failure detection performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T11:09:47Z)
• Confidence Aware Learning for Reliable Face Anti-spoofing [52.23271636362843]
  We propose a Confidence Aware Face Anti-spoofing model, which is aware of its capability boundary. We estimate its confidence during the prediction of each sample. Experiments show that the proposed CA-FAS can effectively recognize samples with low prediction confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T14:29:02Z)
• Revisiting Confidence Estimation: Towards Reliable Failure Prediction [53.79160907725975]
  We find a general, widely existing but actually-neglected phenomenon that most confidence estimation methods are harmful for detecting misclassification errors. We propose to enlarge the confidence gap by finding flat minima, which yields state-of-the-art failure prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:44:14Z)
• Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Explicit Regularisation and Dynamic Data Pruning [25.982037837953268]
  Deep neural networks (DNN) are prone to miscalibrated predictions, often exhibiting a mismatch between the predicted output and the associated confidence scores. We propose a novel regularization technique that can be used with classification losses, leading to state-of-the-art calibrated predictions at test time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T05:34:58Z)
• Reliability-Aware Prediction via Uncertainty Learning for Person Image Retrieval [51.83967175585896]
  UAL aims at providing reliability-aware predictions by considering data uncertainty and model uncertainty simultaneously. Data uncertainty captures the noise" inherent in the sample, while model uncertainty depicts the model's confidence in the sample's prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T17:53:20Z)
• ProBoost: a Boosting Method for Probabilistic Classifiers [55.970609838687864]
  ProBoost is a new boosting algorithm for probabilistic classifiers. It uses the uncertainty of each training sample to determine the most challenging/uncertain ones. It produces a sequence that progressively focuses on the samples found to have the highest uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T12:49:20Z)
• Holistic Approach to Measure Sample-level Adversarial Vulnerability and its Utility in Building Trustworthy Systems [17.707594255626216]
  Adversarial attack perturbs an image with an imperceptible noise, leading to incorrect model prediction. We propose a holistic approach for quantifying adversarial vulnerability of a sample by combining different perspectives. We demonstrate that by reliably estimating adversarial vulnerability at the sample level, it is possible to develop a trustworthy system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T12:36:17Z)
• Boost Test-Time Performance with Closed-Loop Inference [85.43516360332646]
  We propose to predict hard-classified test samples in a looped manner to boost the model performance. We first devise a filtering criterion to identify those hard-classified test samples that need additional inference loops. For each hard sample, we construct an additional auxiliary learning task based on its original top-$K$ predictions to calibrate the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-21T10:20:21Z)
• Understanding Classifier Mistakes with Generative Models [88.20470690631372]
  Deep neural networks are effective on supervised learning tasks, but have been shown to be brittle. In this paper, we leverage generative models to identify and characterize instances where classifiers fail to generalize. Our approach is agnostic to class labels from the training set which makes it applicable to models trained in a semi-supervised way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T22:13:21Z)
• Harnessing Adversarial Distances to Discover High-Confidence Errors [0.0]
  We investigate the problem of finding errors at rates greater than expected given model confidence. We propose a query-efficient and novel search technique that is guided by adversarial perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T13:44:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.