I Need Help! Evaluating LLM's Ability to Ask for Users' Support: A Case Study on Text-to-SQL Generation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14767v1
- Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:12:29 GMT
- Title: I Need Help! Evaluating LLM's Ability to Ask for Users' Support: A Case Study on Text-to-SQL Generation
- Authors: Cheng-Kuang Wu, Zhi Rui Tam, Chao-Chung Wu, Chieh-Yen Lin, Hung-yi Lee, Yun-Nung Chen,
- Abstract summary: We propose metrics to evaluate the trade-off between performance improvements and user burden.
Our experiments reveal that without external feedback, many LLMs struggle to recognize their need for additional support.
- Score: 60.00337758147594
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: In this study, we explore the proactive ability of LLMs to seek user support, using text-to-SQL generation as a case study. We propose metrics to evaluate the trade-off between performance improvements and user burden, and investigate whether LLMs can determine when to request help and examine their performance with varying levels of information availability. Our experiments reveal that without external feedback, many LLMs struggle to recognize their need for additional support. Our findings highlight the importance of external signals and provide insights for future research on improving support-seeking strategies.
Related papers
- Enhancing Temporal Understanding in LLMs for Semi-structured Tables [50.59009084277447]
We conduct a comprehensive analysis of temporal datasets to pinpoint the specific limitations of large language models (LLMs)
Our investigation leads to enhancements in TempTabQA, a dataset specifically designed for temporal temporal question answering.
We introduce a novel approach, C.L.E.A.R. to strengthen LLM capabilities in this domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T20:13:10Z) - CIBench: Evaluating Your LLMs with a Code Interpreter Plugin [68.95137938214862]
We propose an interactive evaluation framework, named CIBench, to comprehensively assess LLMs' ability to utilize code interpreters for data science tasks.
The evaluation dataset is constructed using an LLM-human cooperative approach and simulates an authentic workflow by leveraging consecutive and interactive IPython sessions.
We conduct extensive experiments to analyze the ability of 24 LLMs on CIBench and provide valuable insights for future LLMs in code interpreter utilization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T07:43:55Z) - Self-Evolving GPT: A Lifelong Autonomous Experiential Learner [40.16716983217304]
We design a lifelong autonomous experiential learning framework based on large language models (LLMs)
It autonomously learns and accumulates experience through experience transfer and induction, categorizing the types of input questions to select which accumulated experience to employ for them.
Experimental results on six widely used NLP datasets show that our framework performs reliably in each intermediate step and effectively improves the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T02:49:13Z) - Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases.
We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning.
Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z) - LLM In-Context Recall is Prompt Dependent [0.0]
A model's ability to do this significantly influences its practical efficacy and dependability in real-world applications.
This study demonstrates that an LLM's recall capability is not only contingent upon the prompt's content but also may be compromised by biases in its training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-13T01:13:59Z) - Benchmarking the Text-to-SQL Capability of Large Language Models: A
Comprehensive Evaluation [33.41556606816004]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool in advancing the Text-to- task.
There is still no consensus on the optimal prompt templates and design frameworks.
Existing benchmarks inadequately explore the performance of LLMs across the various sub-tasks of the Text-to- process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T13:23:48Z) - Why and When LLM-Based Assistants Can Go Wrong: Investigating the
Effectiveness of Prompt-Based Interactions for Software Help-Seeking [5.755004576310333]
Large Language Model (LLM) assistants have emerged as potential alternatives to search methods for helping users navigate software.
LLM assistants use vast training data from domain-specific texts, software manuals, and code repositories to mimic human-like interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T19:49:58Z) - Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation [76.76046657162306]
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a new paradigm for Text-to- task.
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a new paradigm for Text-to- task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-29T14:59:54Z) - Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models
with Retrieval Augmentation [91.30946119104111]
We show that large language models (LLMs) possess unwavering confidence in their capabilities to respond to questions.
Retrieval augmentation proves to be an effective approach in enhancing LLMs' awareness of knowledge boundaries.
We also find that LLMs have a propensity to rely on the provided retrieval results when formulating answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-20T16:46:10Z) - ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Tools [14.408707186450899]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in various NLP tasks.
They still suffer from challenges such as hallucination and weak numerical reasoning.
To overcome these challenges, external tools can be used to enhance LLMs' question-answering abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T05:43:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.