LLM In-Context Recall is Prompt Dependent
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08865v1
- Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 01:13:59 GMT
- Title: LLM In-Context Recall is Prompt Dependent
- Authors: Daniel Machlab, Rick Battle,
- Abstract summary: A model's ability to do this significantly influences its practical efficacy and dependability in real-world applications.
This study demonstrates that an LLM's recall capability is not only contingent upon the prompt's content but also may be compromised by biases in its training data.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) highlights the critical importance of conducting thorough evaluations to discern their comparative advantages, limitations, and optimal use cases. Particularly important is assessing their capacity to accurately retrieve information included in a given prompt. A model's ability to do this significantly influences how effectively it can utilize contextual details, thus impacting its practical efficacy and dependability in real-world applications. Our research analyzes the in-context recall performance of various LLMs using the needle-in-a-haystack method. In this approach, a factoid (the "needle") is embedded within a block of filler text (the "haystack"), which the model is asked to retrieve. We assess the recall performance of each model across various haystack lengths and with varying needle placements to identify performance patterns. This study demonstrates that an LLM's recall capability is not only contingent upon the prompt's content but also may be compromised by biases in its training data. Conversely, adjustments to model architecture, training strategy, or fine-tuning can improve performance. Our analysis provides insight into LLM behavior, offering direction for the development of more effective applications of LLMs.
Related papers
- From Selection to Generation: A Survey of LLM-based Active Learning [153.8110509961261]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been employed for generating entirely new data instances and providing more cost-effective annotations.
This survey aims to serve as an up-to-date resource for researchers and practitioners seeking to gain an intuitive understanding of LLM-based AL techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T12:58:17Z) - Learning Beyond the Surface: How Far Can Continual Pre-Training with LoRA Enhance LLMs' Domain-Specific Insight Learning? [4.390998479503661]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on various tasks.
However, their ability to extract and internalize deeper insights from domain-specific datasets remains underexplored.
This study investigates how continual pre-training can enhance LLMs' capacity for insight learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-29T18:40:32Z) - The Inherent Limits of Pretrained LLMs: The Unexpected Convergence of Instruction Tuning and In-Context Learning Capabilities [51.594836904623534]
We investigate whether instruction-tuned models possess fundamentally different capabilities from base models that are prompted using in-context examples.
We show that the performance of instruction-tuned models is significantly correlated with the in-context performance of their base counterparts.
Specifically, we extend this understanding to instruction-tuned models, suggesting that their pretraining data similarly sets a limiting boundary on the tasks they can solve.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-15T10:57:55Z) - Boosting LLM-based Relevance Modeling with Distribution-Aware Robust Learning [14.224921308101624]
We propose a novel Distribution-Aware Robust Learning framework (DaRL) for relevance modeling.
DaRL has been deployed online to serve the Alipay's insurance product search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-17T03:10:47Z) - Exploring Knowledge Boundaries in Large Language Models for Retrieval Judgment [56.87031484108484]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly recognized for their practical applications.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tackles this challenge and has shown a significant impact on LLMs.
By minimizing retrieval requests that yield neutral or harmful results, we can effectively reduce both time and computational costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-09T15:12:28Z) - Evaluating Linguistic Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs in the Lens of Few-Shot Learning [15.919493497867567]
This study aims to evaluate the performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the VALSE benchmark.
We conducted a comprehensive assessment of state-of-the-art MLLMs, varying in model size and pretraining datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T11:26:47Z) - Comprehensive Reassessment of Large-Scale Evaluation Outcomes in LLMs: A Multifaceted Statistical Approach [64.42462708687921]
Evaluations have revealed that factors such as scaling, training types, architectures and other factors profoundly impact the performance of LLMs.
Our study embarks on a thorough re-examination of these LLMs, targeting the inadequacies in current evaluation methods.
This includes the application of ANOVA, Tukey HSD tests, GAMM, and clustering technique.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-22T14:47:35Z) - LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges.
Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model.
This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z) - C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction [54.39470114243744]
c-ICL is a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations.
Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T11:28:08Z) - EpiK-Eval: Evaluation for Language Models as Epistemic Models [16.485951373967502]
We introduce EpiK-Eval, a novel question-answering benchmark tailored to evaluate LLMs' proficiency in formulating a coherent and consistent knowledge representation from segmented narratives.
We argue that these shortcomings stem from the intrinsic nature of prevailing training objectives.
The findings from this study offer insights for developing more robust and reliable LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T21:15:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.