In-Context Learning Improves Compositional Understanding of Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15487v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 09:03:29 GMT
• Title: In-Context Learning Improves Compositional Understanding of Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Matteo Nulli, Anesa Ibrahimi, Avik Pal, Hoshe Lee, Ivona Najdenkoska,
• Abstract summary: compositional image understanding remains a rather difficult task due to the object bias present in training data. We compare contrastive models with generative ones and analyze their differences in architecture, pre-training data, and training tasks and losses. Our proposed approach outperforms baseline models across multiple compositional understanding datasets.
• Score: 2.762909189433944
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in a large number of downstream tasks. Nonetheless, compositional image understanding remains a rather difficult task due to the object bias present in training data. In this work, we investigate the reasons for such a lack of capability by performing an extensive bench-marking of compositional understanding in VLMs. We compare contrastive models with generative ones and analyze their differences in architecture, pre-training data, and training tasks and losses. Furthermore, we leverage In-Context Learning (ICL) as a way to improve the ability of VLMs to perform more complex reasoning and understanding given an image. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms baseline models across multiple compositional understanding datasets.

Related papers

• The Inherent Limits of Pretrained LLMs: The Unexpected Convergence of Instruction Tuning and In-Context Learning Capabilities [51.594836904623534]
  We investigate whether instruction-tuned models possess fundamentally different capabilities from base models that are prompted using in-context examples. We show that the performance of instruction-tuned models is significantly correlated with the in-context performance of their base counterparts. Specifically, we extend this understanding to instruction-tuned models, suggesting that their pretraining data similarly sets a limiting boundary on the tasks they can solve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T10:57:55Z)
• Progressive Multi-granular Alignments for Grounded Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models [19.054780489639793]
  This paper introduces Progressive multi-granular Vision-Language alignments (PromViL) Our approach constructs a hierarchical structure of multi-modal alignments, ranging from simple to complex concepts. By progressively aligning textual descriptions with corresponding visual regions, our model learns to leverage contextual information from lower levels to inform higher-level reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T06:21:33Z)
• Inst-IT: Boosting Multimodal Instance Understanding via Explicit Visual Prompt Instruction Tuning [125.79428219851289]
  Inst-IT is a solution to enhance LMMs in Instance understanding via explicit visual prompt Instruction Tuning. Inst-IT consists of a benchmark to diagnose multimodal instance-level understanding, a large-scale instruction-tuning dataset, and a continuous instruction-tuning training paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T18:58:10Z)
• MMCOMPOSITION: Revisiting the Compositionality of Pre-trained Vision-Language Models [85.10375181040436]
  We propose MMCOMPOSITION, a novel human-annotated benchmark for comprehensively and accurately evaluating Vision-Language Models. We find GPT-4o's compositionality inferior to the best open-source model, and we analyze the underlying reasons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T05:35:09Z)
• Response Wide Shut: Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities [30.176918208200604]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have emerged as general purpose tools for addressing a variety of complex computer vision problems. These models have been shown to be highly capable, but also lacking some basic visual understanding skills. This paper sets out to understand the limitations of SoTA VLMs on fundamental visual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T08:26:32Z)
• RelationVLM: Making Large Vision-Language Models Understand Visual Relations [66.70252936043688]
  We present RelationVLM, a large vision-language model capable of comprehending various levels and types of relations whether across multiple images or within a video. Specifically, we devise a multi-stage relation-aware training scheme and a series of corresponding data configuration strategies to bestow RelationVLM with the capabilities of understanding semantic relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T15:01:19Z)
• Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions [11.786387517781328]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are advanced models that can tackle more intricate tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. Our classification organizes VLMs into three distinct categories: models dedicated to vision-language understanding, models that process multimodal inputs to generate unimodal (textual) outputs and models that both accept and produce multimodal inputs and outputs. We meticulously dissect each model, offering an extensive analysis of its foundational architecture, training data sources, as well as its strengths and limitations wherever possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:57:34Z)
• Can Large Language Models Understand Context? [17.196362853457412]
  This paper introduces a context understanding benchmark by adapting existing datasets to suit the evaluation of generative models. Experimental results indicate that pre-trained dense models struggle with understanding more nuanced contextual features when compared to state-of-the-art fine-tuned models. As LLM compression holds growing significance in both research and real-world applications, we assess the context understanding of quantized models under in-context-learning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:55:29Z)
• UniDiff: Advancing Vision-Language Models with Generative and Discriminative Learning [86.91893533388628]
  This paper presents UniDiff, a unified multi-modal model that integrates image-text contrastive learning (ITC), text-conditioned image synthesis learning (IS), and reciprocal semantic consistency modeling (RSC) UniDiff demonstrates versatility in both multi-modal understanding and generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T15:39:38Z)
• GPT4Image: Can Large Pre-trained Models Help Vision Models on Perception Tasks? [51.22096780511165]
  We present a new learning paradigm in which the knowledge extracted from large pre-trained models are utilized to help models like CNN and ViT learn enhanced representations. We feed detailed descriptions into a pre-trained encoder to extract text embeddings with rich semantic information that encodes the content of images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T14:02:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.