MMCOMPOSITION: Revisiting the Compositionality of Pre-trained Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09733v1
• Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 05:35:09 GMT
• Title: MMCOMPOSITION: Revisiting the Compositionality of Pre-trained Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Hang Hua, Yunlong Tang, Ziyun Zeng, Liangliang Cao, Zhengyuan Yang, Hangfeng He, Chenliang Xu, Jiebo Luo,
• Abstract summary: We propose MMCOMPOSITION, a novel human-annotated benchmark for comprehensively and accurately evaluating Vision-Language Models. We find GPT-4o's compositionality inferior to the best open-source model, and we analyze the underlying reasons.
• Score: 85.10375181040436
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The advent of large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) has significantly advanced multimodal understanding, enabling more sophisticated and accurate integration of visual and textual information across various tasks, including image and video captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Despite VLMs' superior capabilities, researchers lack a comprehensive understanding of their compositionality -- the ability to understand and produce novel combinations of known visual and textual components. Prior benchmarks provide only a relatively rough compositionality evaluation from the perspectives of objects, relations, and attributes while neglecting deeper reasoning about object interactions, counting, and complex compositions. However, compositionality is a critical ability that facilitates coherent reasoning and understanding across modalities for VLMs. To address this limitation, we propose MMCOMPOSITION, a novel human-annotated benchmark for comprehensively and accurately evaluating VLMs' compositionality. Our proposed benchmark serves as a complement to these earlier works. With MMCOMPOSITION, we can quantify and explore the compositionality of the mainstream VLMs. Surprisingly, we find GPT-4o's compositionality inferior to the best open-source model, and we analyze the underlying reasons. Our experimental analysis reveals the limitations of VLMs in fine-grained compositional perception and reasoning, and points to areas for improvement in VLM design and training. Resources available at: https://hanghuacs.github.io/MMComposition/

Related papers

• FINECAPTION: Compositional Image Captioning Focusing on Wherever You Want at Any Granularity [68.15983300711355]
  FineCAPTION is a novel VLM that can recognize arbitrary masks as referential inputs and process high-resolution images for compositional image captioning at different levels. We introduce COMPOSITIONCAP, a new dataset for multi-grained region compositional image captioning, which introduces the task of compositional attribute-aware regional image captioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T02:20:32Z)
• VidComposition: Can MLLMs Analyze Compositions in Compiled Videos? [35.05305360406699]
  VidComposition is a benchmark to evaluate the video composition understanding capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) It includes 982 videos with 1706 multiple-choice questions, covering various compositional aspects such as camera movement, angle, shot size, narrative structure, character actions and emotions, etc. Our comprehensive evaluation of 33 open-source and proprietary MLLMs reveals a significant performance gap between human and model capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T06:23:46Z)
• Response Wide Shut: Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities [30.176918208200604]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have emerged as general purpose tools for addressing a variety of complex computer vision problems. These models have been shown to be highly capable, but also lacking some basic visual understanding skills. This paper sets out to understand the limitations of SoTA VLMs on fundamental visual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T08:26:32Z)
• In-Context Learning Improves Compositional Understanding of Vision-Language Models [2.762909189433944]
  compositional image understanding remains a rather difficult task due to the object bias present in training data. We compare contrastive models with generative ones and analyze their differences in architecture, pre-training data, and training tasks and losses. Our proposed approach outperforms baseline models across multiple compositional understanding datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T09:03:29Z)
• Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs [56.391404083287235]
  We introduce Cambrian-1, a family of multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) designed with a vision-centric approach. Our study uses LLMs and visual instruction tuning as an interface to evaluate various visual representations. We provide model weights, code, supporting tools, datasets, and detailed instruction-tuning and evaluation recipes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:59:42Z)
• Prism: A Framework for Decoupling and Assessing the Capabilities of VLMs [83.24033574914425]
  We present Prism, an innovative framework designed to disentangle the perception and reasoning processes involved in visual question solving. Prism comprises two distinct stages: a perception stage that utilizes a VLM to extract and articulate visual information in textual form, and a reasoning stage that formulates responses based on the extracted visual information. Our analytical framework provides several valuable insights, underscoring Prism's potential as a cost-effective solution for vision-language tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:54:03Z)
• Exploring the Spectrum of Visio-Linguistic Compositionality and Recognition [61.956088652094515]
  Vision and language models (VLMs) have showcased remarkable zero-shot recognition abilities. But they face challenges in visio-linguistic compositionality, particularly in linguistic comprehension and fine-grained image-text alignment. This paper explores the intricate relationship between compositionality and recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T17:58:39Z)
• Diagnosing the Compositional Knowledge of Vision Language Models from a Game-Theoretic View [26.52297849056656]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) surprisingly lack sufficient knowledge with respect to compositional reasoning. We propose evaluation methods from a novel game-theoretic view to assess the vulnerability of VLMs on different aspects of compositional understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T14:22:03Z)
• Incorporating Structured Representations into Pretrained Vision & Language Models Using Scene Graphs [79.64891686479213]
  We show that it is possible to improve vision and language models (VLMs) when learning from scene graphs (SGs) For the visual side, we incorporate a special "SG Component" in the image transformer trained to predict SG information, while for the textual side, we utilize SGs to generate fine-grained captions. Our method improves the performance of several popular VLMs on multiple datasets with only a mild degradation in ZS capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T17:52:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.