Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Security: A Reconnaissance and Vulnerability Assessment Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15984v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 18:51:59 GMT
• Title: Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Security: A Reconnaissance and Vulnerability Assessment Approach
• Authors: Sarina Dastgerdy,
• Abstract summary: Various industries have widely adopted Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) technologies to enhance productivity and user experiences. This systematic literature review focuses on identifying devices used in AR and VR technologies and specifies the associated vulnerabilities.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Various industries have widely adopted Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) technologies to enhance productivity and user experiences. However, their integration introduces significant security challenges. This systematic literature review focuses on identifying devices used in AR and VR technologies and specifies the associated vulnerabilities, particularly during the reconnaissance phase and vulnerability assessment, which are critical steps in penetration testing. Following Kitchenham and Charters' guidelines, we systematically selected and analyzed primary studies. The reconnaissance phase involves gathering detailed information about AR and VR systems to identify potential attack vectors. In the vulnerability assessment phase, these vectors are analyzed to pinpoint weaknesses that malicious actors could exploit. Our findings reveal that AR and VR devices, such as headsets (e.g., HTC Vive, Oculus Quest), development platforms (e.g., Unity Framework, Google Cardboard SDK), and applications (e.g., Bigscreen VR, VRChat), are susceptible to various attacks, including remote code execution, cross-site scripting (XSS), eavesdropping, and man-in-the-room attacks. Specifically, the Bigscreen VR application exhibited severe vulnerabilities like remote code execution (RCE) via the 'Application.OpenURL' API, XSS in user inputs, and botnet propagation. Similarly, the Oculus Quest demonstrated susceptibility to side-channel attacks and ransomware. This paper provides a detailed overview of specific device vulnerabilities and emphasizes the importance of the initial steps in penetration testing to identify security weaknesses in AR and VR systems. By highlighting these vulnerabilities, we aim to assist researchers in exploring and mitigating these security challenges, ensuring the safe deployment and use of AR and VR technologies across various sectors.

Related papers

• Enabling Developers, Protecting Users: Investigating Harassment and Safety in VR [7.404772554852628]
  This study examines users' perceptions of safety control usability and effectiveness as well as the challenges that developers face in designing and deploying VR safety controls. We identify challenges VR users face while employing safety controls, such as finding users in crowded virtual spaces to block them. We emphasize the importance of establishing technical and legal guidelines to enhance user safety in virtual environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T18:15:53Z)
• An Empirical Study on Oculus Virtual Reality Applications: Security and Privacy Perspectives [46.995904896724994]
  This paper develops a security and privacy assessment tool, namely the VR-SP detector for VR apps. Using the VR-SP detector, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study on 500 popular VR apps. We find that a number of security vulnerabilities and privacy leaks widely exist in VR apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T13:53:25Z)
• Immersed in Reality Secured by Design -- A Comprehensive Analysis of Security Measures in AR/VR Environments [0.0]
  Data theft and other forms of cyberattack pose serious threats to virtual reality systems. As a result, AR systems are just as vulnerable as any other Internet of Things (IoT) device we use on a daily basis. Cybercriminals can exploit virtual reality headsets just like any other computer system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T21:24:52Z)
• Deep Motion Masking for Secure, Usable, and Scalable Real-Time Anonymization of Virtual Reality Motion Data [49.68609500290361]
  Recent studies have demonstrated that the motion tracking "telemetry" data used by nearly all VR applications is as uniquely identifiable as a fingerprint scan. We present in this paper a state-of-the-art VR identification model that can convincingly bypass known defensive countermeasures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T01:34:22Z)
• Towards Modeling Software Quality of Virtual Reality Applications from Users' Perspectives [44.46088489942242]
  We conduct the first large-scale empirical study to model the software quality of VR applications from users' perspectives. We analyze 1,132,056 user reviews of 14,150 VR applications across seven app stores through a semiautomatic review mining approach. Our analysis reveals that the VR-specific quality attributes are of utmost importance to users, which are closely related to the most unique properties of VR applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-13T14:42:47Z)
• On the Security Risks of Knowledge Graph Reasoning [71.64027889145261]
  We systematize the security threats to KGR according to the adversary's objectives, knowledge, and attack vectors. We present ROAR, a new class of attacks that instantiate a variety of such threats. We explore potential countermeasures against ROAR, including filtering of potentially poisoning knowledge and training with adversarially augmented queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T18:47:42Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
• Towards Secure and Usable Authentication for Augmented and Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays [5.476958867922322]
  ZeTA protocol allows secure authentication even in shared spaces for the AR & VR context. Research goal is to evaluate different designs of ZeTA concerning their usability and users' risk perception regarding their security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-22T20:34:14Z)
• Automatic Recommendation of Strategies for Minimizing Discomfort in Virtual Environments [58.720142291102135]
  In this work, we first present a detailed review about possible causes of Cybersickness (CS) Our system is able to suggest if the user may be entering in the next moments of the application into an illness situation. The CSPQ (Cybersickness Profile Questionnaire) is also proposed, which is used to identify the player's susceptibility to CS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-27T19:28:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.