How to Train the Teacher Model for Effective Knowledge Distillation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18041v1
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:39:11 GMT
- Title: How to Train the Teacher Model for Effective Knowledge Distillation
- Authors: Shayan Mohajer Hamidi, Xizhen Deng, Renhao Tan, Linfeng Ye, Ahmed Hussein Salamah,
- Abstract summary: Training the teacher model with MSE loss equates to minimizing the MSE between its output and BCPD.
substituting the conventional teacher trained with cross-entropy loss with one trained using MSE loss in state-of-the-art KD methods consistently boosts the student's accuracy.
- Score: 0.3495246564946556
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Recently, it was shown that the role of the teacher in knowledge distillation (KD) is to provide the student with an estimate of the true Bayes conditional probability density (BCPD). Notably, the new findings propose that the student's error rate can be upper-bounded by the mean squared error (MSE) between the teacher's output and BCPD. Consequently, to enhance KD efficacy, the teacher should be trained such that its output is close to BCPD in MSE sense. This paper elucidates that training the teacher model with MSE loss equates to minimizing the MSE between its output and BCPD, aligning with its core responsibility of providing the student with a BCPD estimate closely resembling it in MSE terms. In this respect, through a comprehensive set of experiments, we demonstrate that substituting the conventional teacher trained with cross-entropy loss with one trained using MSE loss in state-of-the-art KD methods consistently boosts the student's accuracy, resulting in improvements of up to 2.6\%.
Related papers
- SGD-Based Knowledge Distillation with Bayesian Teachers: Theory and Guidelines [82.00660447875266]
Knowledge Distillation (KD) is a central paradigm for transferring knowledge from a large teacher network to a typically smaller student model, often by leveraging soft probabilistic outputs.<n>We rigorously analyze the convergence behavior of students trained with Gradient Descent (SGD)<n>Our analysis shows that learning from BCPs yields variance reduction and removes neighborhood terms in the convergence bounds compared to one-hot supervision.<n>Motivated by these insights, we advocate the use of Bayesian deep learning models, which typically provide improved estimates of the BCPs, as teachers in KD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-04T11:09:49Z) - Biased Teacher, Balanced Student [0.0]
Long-Tailed Knowledge Distillation (LTKD) is a novel framework tailored for class-imbalanced scenarios.<n>Experiments on CIFAR-100-LT, TinyImageNet-LT, and ImageNet-LT show that LTKD consistently outperforms existing KD methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T10:46:44Z) - Dual-Forward Path Teacher Knowledge Distillation: Bridging the Capacity Gap Between Teacher and Student [10.640836487708647]
We propose Dual-Forward Path Teacher Knowledge Distillation (DFPT-KD) to address the capacity gap problem.<n>DFPT-KD replaces the pre-trained teacher with a novel dual-forward path teacher to supervise the learning of student.<n>Experiments demonstrate that DFPT-KD leads to trained students performing better than the vanilla KD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T02:22:53Z) - ABKD: Pursuing a Proper Allocation of the Probability Mass in Knowledge Distillation via $α$-$β$-Divergence [89.630486749083]
Knowledge Distillation (KD) transfers knowledge from a large teacher model to a smaller student model.<n>The core challenge in KD lies in balancing two mode-concentration effects.<n>We propose ABKD, a generic framework with $alpha$$beta$-divergence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-07T16:48:49Z) - Speculative Knowledge Distillation: Bridging the Teacher-Student Gap Through Interleaved Sampling [81.00825302340984]
We introduce Speculative Knowledge Distillation (SKD) to generate high-quality training data on-the-fly.
In SKD, the student proposes tokens, and the teacher replaces poorly ranked ones based on its own distribution.
We evaluate SKD on various text generation tasks, including translation, summarization, math, and instruction following.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T06:51:25Z) - Efficient and Robust Knowledge Distillation from A Stronger Teacher Based on Correlation Matching [0.09999629695552192]
Correlation Matching Knowledge Distillation (CMKD) method combines the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients-based KD loss to achieve more efficient and robust distillation from a stronger teacher model.
CMKD is simple yet practical, and extensive experiments demonstrate that it can consistently achieve state-of-the-art performance on CIRAR-100 and ImageNet.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T05:42:47Z) - Relative Difficulty Distillation for Semantic Segmentation [54.76143187709987]
We propose a pixel-level KD paradigm for semantic segmentation named Relative Difficulty Distillation (RDD)
RDD allows the teacher network to provide effective guidance on learning focus without additional optimization goals.
Our research showcases that RDD can integrate with existing KD methods to improve their upper performance bound.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T08:08:25Z) - Improve Knowledge Distillation via Label Revision and Data Selection [37.74822443555646]
This paper proposes to rectify the teacher's inaccurate predictions using the ground truth.
In the latter, we introduce a data selection technique to choose suitable training samples to be supervised by the teacher.
Experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method, and show that our method can be combined with other distillation approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-03T02:41:16Z) - Bayes Conditional Distribution Estimation for Knowledge Distillation
Based on Conditional Mutual Information [3.84949625314596]
We introduce the concept of conditional mutual information (CMI) into the estimation of Bayes conditional probability distribution (BCPD)
In MCMI estimation, both the log-likelihood and CMI of the teacher are simultaneously maximized when the teacher is trained.
We show that such improvements in the student's accuracy are more drastic in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T16:01:37Z) - Comparative Knowledge Distillation [102.35425896967791]
Traditional Knowledge Distillation (KD) assumes readily available access to teacher models for frequent inference.
We propose Comparative Knowledge Distillation (CKD), which encourages student models to understand the nuanced differences in a teacher model's interpretations of samples.
CKD consistently outperforms state of the art data augmentation and KD techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T21:55:33Z) - Faithful Knowledge Distillation [75.59907631395849]
We focus on two crucial questions with regard to a teacher-student pair: (i) do the teacher and student disagree at points close to correctly classified dataset examples, and (ii) is the distilled student as confident as the teacher around dataset examples?
These are critical questions when considering the deployment of a smaller student network trained from a robust teacher within a safety-critical setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T13:41:55Z) - Grouped Knowledge Distillation for Deep Face Recognition [53.57402723008569]
The light-weight student network has difficulty fitting the target logits due to its low model capacity.
We propose a Grouped Knowledge Distillation (GKD) that retains the Primary-KD and Binary-KD but omits Secondary-KD in the ultimate KD loss calculation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-10T09:04:38Z) - On student-teacher deviations in distillation: does it pay to disobey? [54.908344098305804]
Knowledge distillation has been widely used to improve the test accuracy of a "student" network.
Despite being trained to fit the teacher's probabilities, the student may not only significantly deviate from the teacher probabilities, but may also outdo the teacher in performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-30T14:25:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.