Rusty Linux: Advances in Rust for Linux Kernel Development

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18431v2
• Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 18:42:43 GMT
• Title: Rusty Linux: Advances in Rust for Linux Kernel Development
• Authors: Shane K. Panter, Nasir U. Eisty,
• Abstract summary: Integration of Rust into kernel development is a transformative endeavor aimed at enhancing system security and reliability. We identify the advantages Rust offers, highlight the challenges faced, and emphasize the need for community consensus on Rust's adoption.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Context: The integration of Rust into kernel development is a transformative endeavor aimed at enhancing system security and reliability by leveraging Rust's strong memory safety guarantees. Objective: We aim to find the current advances in using Rust in Kernel development to reduce the number of memory safety vulnerabilities in one of the most critical pieces of software that underpins all modern applications. Method: By analyzing a broad spectrum of studies, we identify the advantages Rust offers, highlight the challenges faced, and emphasize the need for community consensus on Rust's adoption. Results: Our findings suggest that while the initial implementations of Rust in the kernel show promising results in terms of safety and stability, significant challenges remain. These challenges include achieving seamless interoperability with existing kernel components, maintaining performance, and ensuring adequate support and tooling for developers. Conclusions: This study underscores the need for continued research and practical implementation efforts to fully realize the benefits of Rust. By addressing these challenges, the integration of Rust could mark a significant step forward in the evolution of operating system development towards safer and more reliable systems

Related papers

• Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey [59.26328612791924]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has quickly grown into a pivotal paradigm in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose a unified framework that assesses the trustworthiness of RAG systems across six key dimensions: factuality, robustness, fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T09:06:44Z)
• Cross-Modality Safety Alignment [73.8765529028288]
  We introduce a novel safety alignment challenge called Safe Inputs but Unsafe Output (SIUO) to evaluate cross-modality safety alignment. To empirically investigate this problem, we developed the SIUO, a cross-modality benchmark encompassing 9 critical safety domains, such as self-harm, illegal activities, and privacy violations. Our findings reveal substantial safety vulnerabilities in both closed- and open-source LVLMs, underscoring the inadequacy of current models to reliably interpret and respond to complex, real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T16:14:15Z)
• Bringing Rust to Safety-Critical Systems in Space [1.0742675209112622]
  Rust aims to drastically reduce the chance of introducing bugs and produces overall more secure and safer code. This work provides a set of recommendations for the development of safety-critical space systems in Rust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T12:48:47Z)
• Securing the Open RAN Infrastructure: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Deployments [60.51751612363882]
  We investigate the security implications of and software-based Open Radio Access Network (RAN) systems. We highlight the presence of potential vulnerabilities and misconfigurations in the infrastructure supporting the Near Real-Time RAN Controller (RIC) cluster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T07:18:45Z)
• A Mixed-Methods Study on the Implications of Unsafe Rust for Interoperation, Encapsulation, and Tooling [2.2463451968497425]
  Rust developers need verification tools that can provide guarantees of soundness within multi-language applications. We study how developers reason about foreign function calls, the limitations of the tools that they currently use, their motivations for using unsafe code, and how they reason about encapsulating it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T18:36:21Z)
• Towards a Transpiler for C/C++ to Safer Rust [0.10993800728351737]
  Rust is a programming language developed by Mozilla that focuses on performance and safety. How to convert an existing C++ code base to Rust is also gaining greater attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T10:35:59Z)
• Static Deadlock Detection for Rust Programs [6.596623081054982]
  Rust relies on its unique ownership mechanism to ensure thread and memory safety. New language features in Rust pose new challenges for vulnerability detection. This paper proposes a static deadlock detection method tailored for Rust programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T09:09:48Z)
• A Closer Look at the Security Risks in the Rust Ecosystem [0.0]
  Rust is an emerging programming language designed for the development of systems software. To facilitate the reuse of Rust code, crates.io, as a central package registry of the Rust ecosystem, hosts thousands of third-party Rust packages. The openness of crates.io enables the growth of the Rust ecosystem but comes with security risks by severe security advisories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T06:05:25Z)
• Approximate Shielding of Atari Agents for Safe Exploration [83.55437924143615]
  We propose a principled algorithm for safe exploration based on the concept of shielding. We present preliminary results that show our approximate shielding algorithm effectively reduces the rate of safety violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T16:19:54Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Meta-Learning Hypothesis Spaces for Sequential Decision-making [79.73213540203389]
  We propose to meta-learn a kernel from offline data (Meta-KeL) Under mild conditions, we guarantee that our estimated RKHS yields valid confidence sets. We also empirically evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on a Bayesian optimization task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-01T17:46:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.