Effective Large Language Model Debugging with Best-first Tree Search

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19055v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:26:00 GMT
• Title: Effective Large Language Model Debugging with Best-first Tree Search
• Authors: Jialin Song, Jonathan Raiman, Bryan Catanzaro,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in code generation tasks. LLMs cannot consistently spot and fix bugs. We propose an algorithm to enable LLMs to debug their code via self-reflection and search where a model attempts to identify its previous mistakes.
• Score: 27.68711322875045
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in code generation tasks. However, their code-writing abilities are often limited in scope: while they can successfully implement simple functions, they struggle with more complex tasks. A fundamental difference with how an LLM writes code, compared to a human programmer, is that it cannot consistently spot and fix bugs. Debugging is a crucial skill for programmers and it enables iterative code refinement towards a correct implementation. In this work, we propose a novel algorithm to enable LLMs to debug their code via self-reflection and search where a model attempts to identify its previous mistakes. Our key contributions are 1) a best-first tree search algorithm with self-reflections (BESTER) that achieves state-of-the-art Pass@1 in three code generation benchmarks. BESTER maintains its superiority when we measure pass rates taking into account additional inference costs incurred by tree search. 2) A novel interpretability study on what self-reflections attend to in buggy programs and how they impact bug fixes, which provides a deeper understanding of the debugging process. 3) An extensive study on when self-reflections are effective in finding bugs.

Related papers

• BugSpotter: Automated Generation of Code Debugging Exercises [22.204802715829615]
  This paper introduces BugSpotter, a tool to generate buggy code from a problem description and verify the synthesized bugs via a test suite. Students interact with BugSpotter by designing failing test cases, where the buggy code's output differs from the expected result as defined by the problem specification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T16:56:33Z)
• CodeTree: Agent-guided Tree Search for Code Generation with Large Language Models [106.11371409170818]
  Large language models (LLMs) can act as agents with capabilities to self-refine and improve generated code autonomously. We propose CodeTree, a framework for LLM agents to efficiently explore the search space in different stages of the code generation process. Specifically, we adopted a unified tree structure to explicitly explore different coding strategies, generate corresponding coding solutions, and subsequently refine the solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T00:09:54Z)
• Steering Large Language Models between Code Execution and Textual Reasoning [22.279107036500083]
  Textual reasoning has inherent limitations in solving tasks with challenges in math, logics, optimization, and searching. The recently released OpenAI GPT Code Interpreter and multi-agent frameworks such as AutoGen have demonstrated remarkable proficiency of integrating code generation and execution. We propose three methods to better steer LLM code/text generation and achieve a notable improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T15:44:47Z)
• No Man is an Island: Towards Fully Automatic Programming by Code Search, Code Generation and Program Repair [9.562123938545522]
  toolname can integrate various code search, generation, and repair tools, combining these three research areas together for the first time. We conduct preliminary experiments to demonstrate the potential of our framework, eg helping CodeLlama solve 267 programming problems with an improvement of 62.53%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T06:24:29Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• Chain of Targeted Verification Questions to Improve the Reliability of Code Generated by LLMs [10.510325069289324]
  We propose a self-refinement method aimed at improving the reliability of code generated by LLMs. Our approach is based on targeted Verification Questions (VQs) to identify potential bugs within the initial code. Our method attempts to repair these potential bugs by re-prompting the LLM with the targeted VQs and the initial code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T19:02:50Z)
• DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Models [80.73121177868357]
  DebugBench is a benchmark for Large Language Models (LLMs) It covers four major bug categories and 18 minor types in C++, Java, and Python. We evaluate two commercial and four open-source models in a zero-shot scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T15:46:38Z)
• Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug [62.424077000154945]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance on code generation. We propose Self- Debugging, which teaches a large language model to debug its predicted program via few-shot demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-11T10:43:43Z)
• BigIssue: A Realistic Bug Localization Benchmark [89.8240118116093]
  BigIssue is a benchmark for realistic bug localization. We provide a general benchmark with a diversity of real and synthetic Java bugs. We hope to advance the state of the art in bug localization, in turn improving APR performance and increasing its applicability to the modern development cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T20:17:53Z)
• Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS [54.22600767666257]
  We introduce APPS, a benchmark for code generation. Our benchmark includes 10,000 problems, which range from having simple one-line solutions to being substantial algorithmic challenges. Recent models such as GPT-Neo can pass approximately 15% of the test cases of introductory problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T17:58:42Z)
• Generating Bug-Fixes Using Pretrained Transformers [11.012132897417592]
  We introduce a data-driven program repair approach which learns to detect and fix bugs in Java methods mined from real-world GitHub. We show that pretraining on source code programs improves the number of patches found by 33% as compared to supervised training from scratch. We refine the standard accuracy evaluation metric into non-deletion and deletion-only fixes, and show that our best model generates 75% more non-deletion fixes than the previous state of the art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T05:27:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.