Overview of PerpectiveArg2024: The First Shared Task on Perspective Argument Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19670v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 03:14:57 GMT
• Title: Overview of PerpectiveArg2024: The First Shared Task on Perspective Argument Retrieval
• Authors: Neele Falk, Andreas Waldis, Iryna Gurevych,
• Abstract summary: We present a novel dataset covering demographic and socio-cultural (socio) variables, such as age, gender, and political attitude, representing minority and majority groups in society. We find substantial challenges in incorporating perspectivism, especially when aiming for personalization based solely on the text of arguments without explicitly providing socio profiles. While we bootstrap perspective argument retrieval, further research is essential to optimize retrieval systems to facilitate personalization and reduce polarization.
• Score: 56.66761232081188
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Argument retrieval is the task of finding relevant arguments for a given query. While existing approaches rely solely on the semantic alignment of queries and arguments, this first shared task on perspective argument retrieval incorporates perspectives during retrieval, accounting for latent influences in argumentation. We present a novel multilingual dataset covering demographic and socio-cultural (socio) variables, such as age, gender, and political attitude, representing minority and majority groups in society. We distinguish between three scenarios to explore how retrieval systems consider explicitly (in both query and corpus) and implicitly (only in query) formulated perspectives. This paper provides an overview of this shared task and summarizes the results of the six submitted systems. We find substantial challenges in incorporating perspectivism, especially when aiming for personalization based solely on the text of arguments without explicitly providing socio profiles. Moreover, retrieval systems tend to be biased towards the majority group but partially mitigate bias for the female gender. While we bootstrap perspective argument retrieval, further research is essential to optimize retrieval systems to facilitate personalization and reduce polarization.

Related papers

• Open-World Evaluation for Retrieving Diverse Perspectives [39.22331280176582]
  We curate a Benchmark for Retrieval Diversity for Subjective questions (BERDS) Each example consists of a question and diverse perspectives associated with the question. We build a language model based automatic evaluator that decides whether each retrieved document contains a perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T17:52:57Z)
• Beyond Relevance: Evaluate and Improve Retrievers on Perspective Awareness [56.42192735214931]
  retrievers are expected to not only rely on the semantic relevance between the documents and the queries but also recognize the nuanced intents or perspectives behind a user query. In this work, we study whether retrievers can recognize and respond to different perspectives of the queries. We show that current retrievers have limited awareness of subtly different perspectives in queries and can also be biased toward certain perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T17:10:00Z)
• An Empirical Analysis of Diversity in Argument Summarization [4.128725138940779]
  We introduce three aspects of diversity: those of opinions, annotators, and sources. We evaluate approaches to a popular argument summarization task called Key Point Analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T16:26:52Z)
• Fair Abstractive Summarization of Diverse Perspectives [103.08300574459783]
  A fair summary should provide a comprehensive coverage of diverse perspectives without underrepresenting certain groups. We first formally define fairness in abstractive summarization as not underrepresenting perspectives of any groups of people. We propose four reference-free automatic metrics by measuring the differences between target and source perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T03:38:55Z)
• Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
  We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs) We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z)
• Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysis [86.79402670904338]
  Existing facial analysis systems have been shown to yield biased results against certain demographic subgroups. It has become imperative to ensure that these systems do not discriminate based on gender, identity, or skin tone of individuals. This has led to research in the identification and mitigation of bias in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T09:51:13Z)
• Aspect-Oriented Summarization through Query-Focused Extraction [23.62412515574206]
  Real users' needs often fall more closely into aspects, broad topics in a dataset the user is interested in rather than specific queries. We benchmark extractive query-focused training schemes, and propose a contrastive augmentation approach to train the model. We evaluate on two aspect-oriented datasets and find this approach yields focused summaries, better than those from a generic summarization system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T18:06:21Z)
• Fairness for Whom? Understanding the Reader's Perception of Fairness in Text Summarization [9.136419921943235]
  We study the interplay between the fairness notions and how readers perceive them in textual summaries. Standard ROUGE evaluation metrics are unable to quantify the perceived (un)fairness of the summaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-29T05:14:34Z)
• Weakly-Supervised Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Joint Aspect-Sentiment Topic Embedding [71.2260967797055]
  We propose a weakly-supervised approach for aspect-based sentiment analysis. We learn sentiment, aspect> joint topic embeddings in the word embedding space. We then use neural models to generalize the word-level discriminative information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T21:33:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.