Open-World Evaluation for Retrieving Diverse Perspectives

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18110v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 17:52:57 GMT
• Title: Open-World Evaluation for Retrieving Diverse Perspectives
• Authors: Hung-Ting Chen, Eunsol Choi,
• Abstract summary: We curate a Benchmark for Retrieval Diversity for Subjective questions (BERDS) Each example consists of a question and diverse perspectives associated with the question. We build a language model based automatic evaluator that decides whether each retrieved document contains a perspective.
• Score: 39.22331280176582
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We study retrieving a set of documents that covers various perspectives on a complex and contentious question (e.g., will ChatGPT do more harm than good?). We curate a Benchmark for Retrieval Diversity for Subjective questions (BERDS), where each example consists of a question and diverse perspectives associated with the question, sourced from survey questions and debate websites. On this data, retrievers paired with a corpus are evaluated to surface a document set that contains diverse perspectives. Our framing diverges from most retrieval tasks in that document relevancy cannot be decided by simple string matches to references. Instead, we build a language model based automatic evaluator that decides whether each retrieved document contains a perspective. This allows us to evaluate the performance of three different types of corpus (Wikipedia, web snapshot, and corpus constructed on the fly with retrieved pages from the search engine) paired with retrievers. Retrieving diverse documents remains challenging, with the outputs from existing retrievers covering all perspectives on only 33.74% of the examples. We further study the impact of query expansion and diversity-focused reranking approaches and analyze retriever sycophancy. Together, we lay the foundation for future studies in retrieval diversity handling complex queries.

Related papers

• Leveraging Inter-Chunk Interactions for Enhanced Retrieval in Large Language Model-Based Question Answering [12.60063463163226]
  IIER captures the internal connections between document chunks by considering three types of interactions: structural, keyword, and semantic. It identifies multiple seed nodes based on the target question and iteratively searches for relevant chunks to gather supporting evidence. It refines the context and reasoning chain, aiding the large language model in reasoning and answer generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T02:39:55Z)
• Beyond Relevance: Evaluate and Improve Retrievers on Perspective Awareness [56.42192735214931]
  retrievers are expected to not only rely on the semantic relevance between the documents and the queries but also recognize the nuanced intents or perspectives behind a user query. In this work, we study whether retrievers can recognize and respond to different perspectives of the queries. We show that current retrievers have limited awareness of subtly different perspectives in queries and can also be biased toward certain perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T17:10:00Z)
• ExcluIR: Exclusionary Neural Information Retrieval [74.08276741093317]
  We present ExcluIR, a set of resources for exclusionary retrieval. evaluation benchmark includes 3,452 high-quality exclusionary queries. training set contains 70,293 exclusionary queries, each paired with a positive document and a negative document.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T09:43:40Z)
• Decomposing Complex Queries for Tip-of-the-tongue Retrieval [72.07449449115167]
  Complex queries describe content elements (e.g., book characters or events), information beyond the document text. This retrieval setting, called tip of the tongue (TOT), is especially challenging for models reliant on lexical and semantic overlap between query and document text. We introduce a simple yet effective framework for handling such complex queries by decomposing the query into individual clues, routing those as sub-queries to specialized retrievers, and ensembling the results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T11:43:40Z)
• DAPR: A Benchmark on Document-Aware Passage Retrieval [57.45793782107218]
  We propose and name this task emphDocument-Aware Passage Retrieval (DAPR) While analyzing the errors of the State-of-The-Art (SoTA) passage retrievers, we find the major errors (53.5%) are due to missing document context. Our created benchmark enables future research on developing and comparing retrieval systems for the new task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T10:39:57Z)
• Exposing Query Identification for Search Transparency [69.06545074617685]
  We explore the feasibility of approximate exposing query identification (EQI) as a retrieval task by reversing the role of queries and documents in two classes of search systems. We derive an evaluation metric to measure the quality of a ranking of exposing queries, as well as conducting an empirical analysis focusing on various practical aspects of approximate EQI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T20:19:27Z)
• End-to-End Training of Multi-Document Reader and Retriever for Open-Domain Question Answering [36.80395759543162]
  We present an end-to-end differentiable training method for retrieval-augmented open-domain question answering systems. We model retrieval decisions as latent variables over sets of relevant documents. Our proposed method outperforms all existing approaches of comparable size by 2-3% exact match points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T19:25:37Z)
• Cross-Lingual Document Retrieval with Smooth Learning [31.638708227607214]
  Cross-lingual document search is an information retrieval task in which the queries' language differs from the documents' language. We propose a novel end-to-end robust framework that achieves improved performance in cross-lingual search with different documents' languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T03:17:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.