Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19825v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:21:52 GMT
• Title: Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost
• Authors: Sania Nayab, Giulio Rossolini, Giorgio Buttazzo, Nicolamaria Manes, Fabrizio Giacomelli,
• Abstract summary: This paper analyzes the impact of output lengths on large language models (LLMs) inference pipelines. It proposes novel metrics to evaluate them in terms of textitcorrect conciseness. It also examines the impact of controlling output length through a refined prompt engineering strategy, Constrained-CoT.
• Score: 4.299153274884264
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Today's large language models (LLMs) can solve challenging question-answering tasks, and prompt engineering techniques, such as chain-of-thought (CoT), have gained attention for enhancing the explanation and correctness of outputs. Nevertheless, models require significant time to generate answers augmented with lengthy reasoning details. To address this issue, this paper analyzes the impact of output lengths on LLM inference pipelines and proposes novel metrics to evaluate them in terms of \textit{correct conciseness}. It also examines the impact of controlling output length through a refined prompt engineering strategy, Constrained-CoT (CCoT), which encourages the model to limit output length. Experiments on pre-trained LLMs demonstrated the benefit of the proposed metrics and the effectiveness of CCoT across different models. For instance, constraining the reasoning of LLaMA2-70b to 100 words improves the accuracy from 36.01\% (CoT) to 41.07\% (CCoT) on the GSM8K dataset, while reducing the average output length by 28 words.

Related papers

• When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMs [53.77747102201451]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning enhances the multi-step reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) However, for most models and tasks, does an increase in CoT length consistently lead to improved reasoning accuracy? In this paper, we observe a nuanced relationship: as the number of reasoning steps increases, performance initially improves but eventually decreases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T05:28:59Z)
• Closer Look at Efficient Inference Methods: A Survey of Speculative Decoding [1.3479499607624648]
  Speculative decoding addresses bottleneck by introducing a two-stage framework: drafting and verification. A smaller, efficient model generates a preliminary draft, which is then refined by a larger, more sophisticated model. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of speculative decoding methods, categorizing them into draft-centric and model-centric approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T09:46:30Z)
• Understanding Chain-of-Thought in LLMs through Information Theory [16.78730663293352]
  We formalize Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) through an information-theoretic lens. Specifically, our framework quantifies the information gain' at each reasoning step, enabling the identification of failure modes. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach through extensive experiments on toy and GSM-8K data, where it significantly outperforms existing outcome-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T19:14:36Z)
• A Theoretical Perspective for Speculative Decoding Algorithm [60.79447486066416]
  One effective way to accelerate inference is emphSpeculative Decoding, which employs a small model to sample a sequence of draft tokens and a large model to validate. This paper tackles this gap by conceptualizing the decoding problem via markov chain abstraction and studying the key properties, emphoutput quality and inference acceleration, from a theoretical perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T01:53:04Z)
• Optimizing Language Model's Reasoning Abilities with Weak Supervision [48.60598455782159]
  We present textscPuzzleBen, a weakly supervised benchmark that comprises 25,147 complex questions, answers, and human-generated rationales. A unique aspect of our dataset is the inclusion of 10,000 unannotated questions, enabling us to explore utilizing fewer supersized data to boost LLMs' inference capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T07:39:15Z)
• Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Models [48.35385912526338]
  This paper explores the impact of extending input lengths on the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) We isolate the effect of input length using multiple versions of the same sample, each being extended with padding of different lengths, types and locations. We show that the degradation trend appears in every version of our dataset, although at different intensities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T16:04:53Z)
• A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMs [72.65956436513241]
  Decoding methods play an indispensable role in converting language models from next-token predictors into practical task solvers. This paper provides a comprehensive and multifaceted analysis of various decoding methods within the context of large language models. Our findings reveal that decoding method performance is notably task-dependent and influenced by factors such as alignment, model size, and quantization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-10T11:14:53Z)
• Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Semantic Compression [21.35020344956721]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often impose limitations on the length of the text input to ensure the generation of fluent and relevant responses. We propose a novel semantic compression method that enables generalization to texts 6-8 times longer, without incurring significant computational costs or requiring fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T07:04:33Z)
• Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Survey [52.86322823501338]
  We make a systematic review of the literature, including the general methodology of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) We also review the potential pitfalls of SFT along with criticism against it, along with efforts pointing out current deficiencies of existing strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T15:35:16Z)
• Response Length Perception and Sequence Scheduling: An LLM-Empowered LLM Inference Pipeline [22.08897444328099]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of AI, demonstrating unprecedented capacity across various tasks. In this paper, we propose an efficient LLM inference pipeline that harnesses the power of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:36:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.