Improving Faithfulness of Large Language Models in Summarization via Sliding Generation and Self-Consistency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21443v1
• Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:48:48 GMT
• Title: Improving Faithfulness of Large Language Models in Summarization via Sliding Generation and Self-Consistency
• Authors: Taiji Li, Zhi Li, Yin Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) suffer from factual inconsistency problem called hallucinations. We present a novel summary generation strategy, namely SliSum, which exploits the ideas of sliding windows and self-consistency. SliSum significantly improves the faithfulness of diverse LLMs including LLaMA-2, Claude-2 and GPT-3.5 in both short and long text summarization.
• Score: 5.9858789096400224
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in various tasks, they are still suffering from the factual inconsistency problem called hallucinations. For instance, LLMs occasionally generate content that diverges from source article, and prefer to extract information that appears at the beginning and end of the context, especially in long document summarization. Inspired by these findings, we propose to improve the faithfulness of LLMs in summarization by impelling them to process the entire article more fairly and faithfully. We present a novel summary generation strategy, namely SliSum, which exploits the ideas of sliding windows and self-consistency. Specifically, SliSum divides the source article into overlapping windows, and utilizes LLM to generate local summaries for the content in the windows. Finally, SliSum aggregates all local summaries using clustering and majority voting algorithm to produce more faithful summary of entire article. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SliSum significantly improves the faithfulness of diverse LLMs including LLaMA-2, Claude-2 and GPT-3.5 in both short and long text summarization, while maintaining their fluency and informativeness and without additional fine-tuning and resources. We further conduct qualitative and quantitative studies to investigate why SliSum works and impacts of hyperparameters in SliSum on performance.

Related papers

• Scaling Up Summarization: Leveraging Large Language Models for Long Text Extractive Summarization [0.27624021966289597]
  This paper introduces EYEGLAXS, a framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for extractive summarization. EYEGLAXS focuses on extractive summarization to ensure factual and grammatical integrity. The system sets new performance benchmarks on well-known datasets like PubMed and ArXiv.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T13:52:19Z)
• Towards Enhancing Coherence in Extractive Summarization: Dataset and Experiments with LLMs [70.15262704746378]
  We propose a systematically created human-annotated dataset consisting of coherent summaries for five publicly available datasets and natural language user feedback. Preliminary experiments with Falcon-40B and Llama-2-13B show significant performance improvements (10% Rouge-L) in terms of producing coherent summaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T20:25:04Z)
• LaMSUM: Creating Extractive Summaries of User Generated Content using LLMs [6.770555526416268]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across a wide range of NLP tasks, including summarization. We introduce LaMSUM, a novel framework designed to generate extractive summaries from large collections of user-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T10:25:55Z)
• TriSum: Learning Summarization Ability from Large Language Models with Structured Rationale [66.01943465390548]
  We introduce TriSum, a framework for distilling large language models' text summarization abilities into a compact, local model. Our method enhances local model performance on various benchmarks. It also improves interpretability by providing insights into the summarization rationale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T14:36:38Z)
• Can Large Language Model Summarizers Adapt to Diverse Scientific Communication Goals? [19.814974042343028]
  We investigate the controllability of large language models (LLMs) on scientific summarization tasks. We find that non-fine-tuned LLMs outperform humans in the MuP review generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T23:00:54Z)
• Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z)
• Improving Factual Consistency of Text Summarization by Adversarially Decoupling Comprehension and Embellishment Abilities of LLMs [67.56087611675606]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate summaries that are factually inconsistent with original articles. These hallucinations are challenging to detect through traditional methods. We propose an adversarially DEcoupling method to disentangle the abilities of LLMs (DECENT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T08:40:16Z)
• Summarization is (Almost) Dead [49.360752383801305]
  We develop new datasets and conduct human evaluation experiments to evaluate the zero-shot generation capability of large language models (LLMs) Our findings indicate a clear preference among human evaluators for LLM-generated summaries over human-written summaries and summaries generated by fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T08:13:01Z)
• Element-aware Summarization with Large Language Models: Expert-aligned Evaluation and Chain-of-Thought Method [35.181659789684545]
  Automatic summarization generates concise summaries that contain key ideas of source documents. References from CNN/DailyMail and BBC XSum are noisy, mainly in terms of factual hallucination and information redundancy. We propose a Summary Chain-of-Thought (SumCoT) technique to elicit LLMs to generate summaries step by step. Experimental results show our method outperforms state-of-the-art fine-tuned PLMs and zero-shot LLMs by +4.33/+4.77 in ROUGE-L.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T18:54:35Z)
• Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Summarization via Large Language Models [108.30673793281987]
  Cross-lingual summarization ( CLS) generates a summary in a different target language. Recent emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has attracted wide attention from the computational linguistics community. In this report, we empirically use various prompts to guide LLMs to perform zero-shot CLS from different paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T01:27:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.