Securing the Diagnosis of Medical Imaging: An In-depth Analysis of AI-Resistant Attacks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00348v2
• Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 19:15:21 GMT
• Title: Securing the Diagnosis of Medical Imaging: An In-depth Analysis of AI-Resistant Attacks
• Authors: Angona Biswas, MD Abdullah Al Nasim, Kishor Datta Gupta, Roy George, Abdur Rashid,
• Abstract summary: It's common knowledge that attackers might cause misclassification by deliberately creating inputs for machine learning classifiers. Recent arguments have suggested that adversarial attacks could be made against medical image analysis technologies. It is essential to assess how strong medical DNN tasks are against adversarial attacks.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning (ML) is a rapidly developing area of medicine that uses significant resources to apply computer science and statistics to medical issues. ML's proponents laud its capacity to handle vast, complicated, and erratic medical data. It's common knowledge that attackers might cause misclassification by deliberately creating inputs for machine learning classifiers. Research on adversarial examples has been extensively conducted in the field of computer vision applications. Healthcare systems are thought to be highly difficult because of the security and life-or-death considerations they include, and performance accuracy is very important. Recent arguments have suggested that adversarial attacks could be made against medical image analysis (MedIA) technologies because of the accompanying technology infrastructure and powerful financial incentives. Since the diagnosis will be the basis for important decisions, it is essential to assess how strong medical DNN tasks are against adversarial attacks. Simple adversarial attacks have been taken into account in several earlier studies. However, DNNs are susceptible to more risky and realistic attacks. The present paper covers recent proposed adversarial attack strategies against DNNs for medical imaging as well as countermeasures. In this study, we review current techniques for adversarial imaging attacks, detections. It also encompasses various facets of these techniques and offers suggestions for the robustness of neural networks to be improved in the future.

Related papers

• DFT-Based Adversarial Attack Detection in MRI Brain Imaging: Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Alzheimer's Case Studies [0.5249805590164902]
  adversarial attacks on medical images can result in misclassifications in disease diagnosis, potentially leading to severe consequences. In this study, we investigate adversarial attacks on images associated with Alzheimer's disease and propose a defensive method to counteract these attacks. Our approach utilizes a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based autoencoder architecture in conjunction with the two-dimensional Fourier transform of images for detection purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T02:18:23Z)
• Survey on Adversarial Attack and Defense for Medical Image Analysis: Methods and Challenges [64.63744409431001]
  We present a comprehensive survey on advances in adversarial attacks and defenses for medical image analysis. For a fair comparison, we establish a new benchmark for adversarially robust medical diagnosis models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T16:38:58Z)
• Adversarial Attacks and Defences for Skin Cancer Classification [0.0]
  An increase in the usage of such systems can be observed in the healthcare industry. It becomes increasingly important to understand the vulnerabilities in such systems. This paper explores common adversarial attack techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T18:58:21Z)
• Physical Adversarial Attack meets Computer Vision: A Decade Survey [57.46379460600939]
  This paper presents a comprehensive overview of physical adversarial attacks. We take the first step to systematically evaluate the performance of physical adversarial attacks. Our proposed evaluation metric, hiPAA, comprises six perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T01:59:53Z)
• Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks [76.35478518372692]
  We introduce epsilon-illusory, a novel form of adversarial attack on sequential decision-makers. Compared to existing attacks, we empirically find epsilon-illusory to be significantly harder to detect with automated methods. Our findings suggest the need for better anomaly detectors, as well as effective hardware- and system-level defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T19:49:09Z)
• The Security of Deep Learning Defences for Medical Imaging [36.060636819669604]
  We show that an informed attacker can evade five of the current state of the art defences while successfully fooling the victim's deep learning model. We suggest better alternatives for securing healthcare DNNs from such attacks: (1) harden the system's security and (2) use digital signatures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T12:11:17Z)
• Inspect, Understand, Overcome: A Survey of Practical Methods for AI Safety [54.478842696269304]
  The use of deep neural networks (DNNs) in safety-critical applications is challenging due to numerous model-inherent shortcomings. In recent years, a zoo of state-of-the-art techniques aiming to address these safety concerns has emerged. Our paper addresses both machine learning experts and safety engineers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-29T09:54:54Z)
• Detecting Cross-Modal Inconsistency to Defend Against Neural Fake News [57.9843300852526]
  We introduce the more realistic and challenging task of defending against machine-generated news that also includes images and captions. To identify the possible weaknesses that adversaries can exploit, we create a NeuralNews dataset composed of 4 different types of generated articles. In addition to the valuable insights gleaned from our user study experiments, we provide a relatively effective approach based on detecting visual-semantic inconsistencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T14:13:15Z)
• Defending against adversarial attacks on medical imaging AI system, classification or detection? [18.92197034672677]
  We propose a novel robust medical imaging AI framework based on Semi-Supervised Adversarial Training (SSAT) and Unsupervised Adversarial Detection (UAD) We demonstrate the advantages of our robust medical imaging AI system over the existing adversarial defense techniques under diverse real-world settings of adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T08:26:49Z)
• A Thorough Comparison Study on Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Common Thorax Disease Classification in Chest X-rays [63.675522663422896]
  We review various adversarial attack and defense methods on chest X-rays. We find that the attack and defense methods have poor performance with excessive iterations and large perturbations. We propose a new defense method that is robust to different degrees of perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-31T06:21:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.