MMIU: Multimodal Multi-image Understanding for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02718v1
• Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 17:56:41 GMT
• Title: MMIU: Multimodal Multi-image Understanding for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Fanqing Meng, Jin Wang, Chuanhao Li, Quanfeng Lu, Hao Tian, Jiaqi Liao, Xizhou Zhu, Jifeng Dai, Yu Qiao, Ping Luo, Kaipeng Zhang, Wenqi Shao,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal Multi-image Understanding (MMIU) is a comprehensive evaluation suite designed to assess Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) MMIU encompasses 7 types of multi-image relationships, 52 tasks, 77K images, and 11K meticulously curated multiple-choice questions. Our evaluation of 24 popular LVLMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, reveals significant challenges in multi-image comprehension.
• Score: 76.1999277491816
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The capability to process multiple images is crucial for Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to develop a more thorough and nuanced understanding of a scene. Recent multi-image LVLMs have begun to address this need. However, their evaluation has not kept pace with their development. To fill this gap, we introduce the Multimodal Multi-image Understanding (MMIU) benchmark, a comprehensive evaluation suite designed to assess LVLMs across a wide range of multi-image tasks. MMIU encompasses 7 types of multi-image relationships, 52 tasks, 77K images, and 11K meticulously curated multiple-choice questions, making it the most extensive benchmark of its kind. Our evaluation of 24 popular LVLMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, reveals significant challenges in multi-image comprehension, particularly in tasks involving spatial understanding. Even the most advanced models, such as GPT-4o, achieve only 55.7% accuracy on MMIU. Through multi-faceted analytical experiments, we identify key performance gaps and limitations, providing valuable insights for future model and data improvements. We aim for MMIU to advance the frontier of LVLM research and development, moving us toward achieving sophisticated multimodal multi-image user interactions.

Related papers

• MMRA: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Granularity and Multi-Image Relational Association Capabilities in Large Visual Language Models [29.795942154703642]
  We propose the multi-image relation association task and a meticulously curated Multi-granularity Multi-image Association benchmark. Our experiments reveal that on the MMRA benchmark, current multi-image LVLMs exhibit distinct advantages and disadvantages across various subtasks. Our findings indicate that while LVLMs demonstrate a strong capability to perceive image details, enhancing their ability to associate information across multiple images hinges on improving the reasoning capabilities of their language model component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T15:59:01Z)
• Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning [15.296263261737026]
  We introduce a Multi-Image MIRB Benchmark to evaluate visual language models' ability to compare, analyze, and reason across multiple images. Our benchmark encompasses four categories: perception, visual world knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning. We demonstrate that while open-source VLMs were shown to approach the GPT-4V in single-image tasks, a significant gap remains in multi-image reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T16:02:18Z)
• MuirBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robust Multi-image Understanding [150.28164854480912]
  We introduce MuirBench, a benchmark that focuses on robust multi-image understanding capabilities of multimodal LLMs. MuirBench consists of 12 diverse multi-image tasks (e.g., scene understanding, ordering) that involve 10 categories of multi-image relations. We show that even the best-performing models like GPT-4o and Gemini Pro find it challenging to solve MuirBench, achieving 68.0% and 49.3% in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T17:59:52Z)
• Needle In A Multimodal Haystack [79.81804334634408]
  We present the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the capability of existing MLLMs to comprehend long multimodal documents. Our benchmark includes three types of evaluation tasks: multimodal retrieval, counting, and reasoning. We observe that existing models still have significant room for improvement on these tasks, especially on vision-centric evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T13:09:16Z)
• NoteLLM-2: Multimodal Large Representation Models for Recommendation [60.17448025069594]
  We investigate the potential of Large Language Models to enhance multimodal representation in multimodal item-to-item recommendations. One feasible method is the transfer of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) for representation tasks. We propose a novel training framework, NoteLLM-2, specifically designed for multimodal representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T03:24:01Z)
• Browse and Concentrate: Comprehending Multimodal Content via prior-LLM Context Fusion [70.9767518332692]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) that incorporate LLMs with pre-trained vision models have recently demonstrated impressive performance across diverse vision-language tasks. However, they fall short to comprehend context involving multiple images. We propose a two phase paradigm, browse-and-concentrate, to enable in-depth multimodal context fusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T14:59:07Z)
• CoCoT: Contrastive Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Multimodal Models with Multiple Image Inputs [48.269363759989915]
  The research focuses on two aspects: first, image-to-image matching, and second, multi-image-to-text matching. We conduct evaluations on a range of both open-source and closed-source large models, including GPT-4V, Gemini, OpenFlamingo, and MMICL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T00:26:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.