Microservice Vulnerability Analysis: A Literature Review with Empirical Insights
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03960v1
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:13:42 GMT
- Title: Microservice Vulnerability Analysis: A Literature Review with Empirical Insights
- Authors: Raveen Kanishka Jayalath, Hussain Ahmad, Diksha Goel, Muhammad Shuja Syed, Faheem Ullah,
- Abstract summary: We identify, analyze, and report 126 security vulnerabilities inherent in microservice architectures.
This comprehensive analysis enables us to (i) propose a taxonomy that categorizes microservice vulnerabilities based on the distinctive features of microservice architectures.
We also conduct an empirical analysis by performing vulnerability scans on four diverse microservice benchmark applications.
- Score: 2.883578416080909
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Microservice architectures are revolutionizing both small businesses and large corporations, igniting a new era of innovation with their exceptional advantages in maintainability, reusability, and scalability. However, these benefits come with significant security challenges, as the increased complexity of service interactions, expanded attack surfaces, and intricate dependency management introduce a new array of cybersecurity vulnerabilities. While security concerns are mounting, there is a lack of comprehensive research that integrates a review of existing knowledge with empirical analysis of microservice vulnerabilities. This study aims to fill this gap by gathering, analyzing, and synthesizing existing literature on security vulnerabilities associated with microservice architectures. Through a thorough examination of 62 studies, we identify, analyze, and report 126 security vulnerabilities inherent in microservice architectures. This comprehensive analysis enables us to (i) propose a taxonomy that categorizes microservice vulnerabilities based on the distinctive features of microservice architectures; (ii) conduct an empirical analysis by performing vulnerability scans on four diverse microservice benchmark applications using three different scanning tools to validate our taxonomy; and (iii) map our taxonomy vulnerabilities with empirically identified vulnerabilities, providing an in-depth vulnerability analysis at microservice, application, and scanning tool levels. Our study offers crucial guidelines for practitioners and researchers to advance both the state-of-the-practice and the state-of-the-art in securing microservice architectures.
Related papers
- In-Context Experience Replay Facilitates Safety Red-Teaming of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [97.82118821263825]
Text-to-image (T2I) models have shown remarkable progress, but their potential to generate harmful content remains a critical concern in the ML community.
We propose ICER, a novel red-teaming framework that generates interpretable and semantic meaningful problematic prompts.
Our work provides crucial insights for developing more robust safety mechanisms in T2I systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T04:17:24Z) - SoK: Unifying Cybersecurity and Cybersafety of Multimodal Foundation Models with an Information Theory Approach [58.93030774141753]
Multimodal foundation models (MFMs) represent a significant advancement in artificial intelligence.
This paper conceptualizes cybersafety and cybersecurity in the context of multimodal learning.
We present a comprehensive Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) to unify these concepts in MFMs, identifying key threats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-17T23:06:20Z) - Technical Upgrades to and Enhancements of a System Vulnerability Analysis Tool Based on the Blackboard Architecture [0.0]
Generalization logic building on the Blackboard Architecture's rule-fact paradigm was implemented in this system.
The paper concludes with a discussion of avenues of future work, including the implementation of multithreading.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T05:06:42Z) - Microservices-based Software Systems Reengineering: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions [17.094721366340735]
Designing software compatible with cloud-based Microservice Architectures (MSAs) is vital due to the performance, scalability, and availability limitations.
We provide a comprehensive survey of current research into ways of identifying services in systems that can be redeployed as Static, dynamic, and hybrid approaches have been explored.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-18T21:59:05Z) - Securing the Open RAN Infrastructure: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Deployments [60.51751612363882]
We investigate the security implications of and software-based Open Radio Access Network (RAN) systems.
We highlight the presence of potential vulnerabilities and misconfigurations in the infrastructure supporting the Near Real-Time RAN Controller (RIC) cluster.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T07:18:45Z) - Towards Deep Learning Enabled Cybersecurity Risk Assessment for Microservice Architectures [3.0936354370614607]
CyberWise Predictor is a framework designed for predicting and assessing security risks associated with microservice architectures.
Our framework achieves an average accuracy of 92% in automatically predicting vulnerability metrics for new vulnerabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-22T12:42:33Z) - Migration to Microservices: A Comparative Study of Decomposition
Strategies and Analysis Metrics [0.5076419064097734]
We present a novel clustering method to identify potential in a given monolithic application.
Our approach employs a density-based clustering algorithm considering static analysis, structural, and semantic relationships between classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T14:15:00Z) - Data Poisoning for In-context Learning [49.77204165250528]
In-context learning (ICL) has been recognized for its innovative ability to adapt to new tasks.
This paper delves into the critical issue of ICL's susceptibility to data poisoning attacks.
We introduce ICLPoison, a specialized attacking framework conceived to exploit the learning mechanisms of ICL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-03T14:20:20Z) - How Far Have We Gone in Vulnerability Detection Using Large Language
Models [15.09461331135668]
We introduce a comprehensive vulnerability benchmark VulBench.
This benchmark aggregates high-quality data from a wide range of CTF challenges and real-world applications.
We find that several LLMs outperform traditional deep learning approaches in vulnerability detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-21T08:20:39Z) - Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation [59.15220116166561]
This work provides the first comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis.
Focusing on biomedical image analysis but with the potential of transfer to other fields, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-03T14:57:40Z) - Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance.
We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems.
We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.