Distinguishing Chatbot from Human

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04647v1
• Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 13:18:04 GMT
• Title: Distinguishing Chatbot from Human
• Authors: Gauri Anil Godghase, Rishit Agrawal, Tanush Obili, Mark Stamp,
• Abstract summary: We develop a new dataset consisting of more than 750,000 human-written paragraphs. Based on this dataset, we apply Machine Learning (ML) techniques to determine the origin of text. Our proposed solutions offer high classification accuracy and serve as useful tools for textual analysis.
• Score: 1.1249583407496218
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: There have been many recent advances in the fields of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLM), with the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) model being a leading "chatbot." LLM-based chatbots have become so powerful that it may seem difficult to differentiate between human-written and machine-generated text. To analyze this problem, we have developed a new dataset consisting of more than 750,000 human-written paragraphs, with a corresponding chatbot-generated paragraph for each. Based on this dataset, we apply Machine Learning (ML) techniques to determine the origin of text (human or chatbot). Specifically, we consider two methodologies for tackling this issue: feature analysis and embeddings. Our feature analysis approach involves extracting a collection of features from the text for classification. We also explore the use of contextual embeddings and transformer-based architectures to train classification models. Our proposed solutions offer high classification accuracy and serve as useful tools for textual analysis, resulting in a better understanding of chatbot-generated text in this era of advanced AI technology.

Related papers

• GigaCheck: Detecting LLM-generated Content [72.27323884094953]
  In this work, we investigate the task of generated text detection by proposing the GigaCheck. Our research explores two approaches: (i) distinguishing human-written texts from LLM-generated ones, and (ii) detecting LLM-generated intervals in Human-Machine collaborative texts. Specifically, we use a fine-tuned general-purpose LLM in conjunction with a DETR-like detection model, adapted from computer vision, to localize AI-generated intervals within text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T08:30:55Z)
• Detecting Machine-Generated Long-Form Content with Latent-Space Variables [54.07946647012579]
  Existing zero-shot detectors primarily focus on token-level distributions, which are vulnerable to real-world domain shifts. We propose a more robust method that incorporates abstract elements, such as event transitions, as key deciding factors to detect machine versus human texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:42:09Z)
• Long-Span Question-Answering: Automatic Question Generation and QA-System Ranking via Side-by-Side Evaluation [65.16137964758612]
  We explore the use of long-context capabilities in large language models to create synthetic reading comprehension data from entire books. Our objective is to test the capabilities of LLMs to analyze, understand, and reason over problems that require a detailed comprehension of long spans of text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T20:15:10Z)
• Sentiment analysis and random forest to classify LLM versus human source applied to Scientific Texts [0.0]
  It is proposed a new methodology to classify texts coming from an automatic text production engine or a human. Using four different sentiment lexicons, a number of new features where produced, and then fed to a machine learning random forest methodology, to train such a model. Results seem very convincing that this may be a promising research line to detect fraud, in such environments where human are supposed to be the source of texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T16:14:36Z)
• The Imitation Game: Detecting Human and AI-Generated Texts in the Era of ChatGPT and BARD [3.2228025627337864]
  We introduce a novel dataset of human-written and AI-generated texts in different genres. We employ several machine learning models to classify the texts. Results demonstrate the efficacy of these models in discerning between human and AI-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-22T21:00:14Z)
• Unsupervised Sentiment Analysis of Plastic Surgery Social Media Posts [91.3755431537592]
  The massive collection of user posts across social media platforms is primarily untapped for artificial intelligence (AI) use cases. Natural language processing (NLP) is a subfield of AI that leverages bodies of documents, known as corpora, to train computers in human-like language understanding. This study demonstrates that the applied results of unsupervised analysis allow a computer to predict either negative, positive, or neutral user sentiment towards plastic surgery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T20:16:20Z)
• Distinguishing Human Generated Text From ChatGPT Generated Text Using Machine Learning [0.251657752676152]
  This paper presents a machine learning-based solution that can identify the ChatGPT delivered text from the human written text. We have tested the proposed model on a Kaggle dataset consisting of 10,000 texts out of which 5,204 texts were written by humans and collected from news and social media. On the corpus generated by GPT-3.5, the proposed algorithm presents an accuracy of 77%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T09:27:43Z)
• How much do language models copy from their training data? Evaluating linguistic novelty in text generation using RAVEN [63.79300884115027]
  Current language models can generate high-quality text. Are they simply copying text they have seen before, or have they learned generalizable linguistic abstractions? We introduce RAVEN, a suite of analyses for assessing the novelty of generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T04:07:09Z)
• Detecting Bot-Generated Text by Characterizing Linguistic Accommodation in Human-Bot Interactions [9.578008322407928]
  Language generation models' democratization makes it easier to generate human-like text at-scale for nefarious activities. It is essential to understand how people interact with bots and develop methods to detect bot-generated text. This paper shows that bot-generated text detection methods are more robust across datasets and models if we use information about how people respond to it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T14:10:28Z)
• Chatbot Interaction with Artificial Intelligence: Human Data Augmentation with T5 and Language Transformer Ensemble for Text Classification [2.492300648514128]
  We present the Interaction with Artificial Intelligence (CI-AI) framework as an approach to the training of deep learning chatbots for task classification. The intelligent system augments human-sourced data via artificial paraphrasing in order to generate a large set of training data. We find that all models are improved when training data is augmented by the T5 model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T19:37:18Z)
• Robust Conversational AI with Grounded Text Generation [77.56950706340767]
  GTG is a hybrid model which uses a large-scale Transformer neural network as its backbone. It generates responses grounded in dialog belief state and real-world knowledge for task completion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-07T23:49:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.