Deep Learning based Key Information Extraction from Business Documents: Systematic Literature Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06345v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:15:55 GMT
• Title: Deep Learning based Key Information Extraction from Business Documents: Systematic Literature Review
• Authors: Alexander Rombach, Peter Fettke,
• Abstract summary: Deep learning-based approaches for Key Information Extraction have been proposed under the umbrella term Document Understanding. The goal of this systematic literature review is an in-depth analysis of existing approaches in this domain and the identification of opportunities for further research.
• Score: 51.61531917413708
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Extracting key information from documents represents a large portion of business workloads and therefore offers a high potential for efficiency improvements and process automation. With recent advances in deep learning, a plethora of deep learning-based approaches for Key Information Extraction have been proposed under the umbrella term Document Understanding that enable the processing of complex business documents. The goal of this systematic literature review is an in-depth analysis of existing approaches in this domain and the identification of opportunities for further research. To this end, 96 approaches published between 2017 and 2023 are analyzed in this study.

Related papers

• SyROCCo: Enhancing Systematic Reviews using Machine Learning [6.805429133535976]
  This paper explores the use of machine learning techniques to help navigate the systematic review process. The application of ML techniques to subsequent stages of a review, such as data extraction and evidence mapping, is in its infancy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T11:04:43Z)
• Survey on Multi-Document Summarization: Systematic Literature Review [1.1318175666743657]
  This study conducts a systematic literature review of existing methods for multi-document summarization. The findings of the study show that more effective methods are still required for getting higher accuracy of these methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T10:51:35Z)
• Little Giants: Exploring the Potential of Small LLMs as Evaluation Metrics in Summarization in the Eval4NLP 2023 Shared Task [53.163534619649866]
  This paper focuses on assessing the effectiveness of prompt-based techniques to empower Large Language Models to handle the task of quality estimation. We conducted systematic experiments with various prompting techniques, including standard prompting, prompts informed by annotator instructions, and innovative chain-of-thought prompting. Our work reveals that combining these approaches using a "small", open source model (orca_mini_v3_7B) yields competitive results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T17:44:35Z)
• Embedding Knowledge for Document Summarization: A Survey [66.76415502727802]
  Previous works proved that knowledge-embedded document summarizers excel at generating superior digests. We propose novel to recapitulate knowledge and knowledge embeddings under the document summarization view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-24T04:36:07Z)
• Deep Learning Schema-based Event Extraction: Literature Review and Current Trends [60.29289298349322]
  Event extraction technology based on deep learning has become a research hotspot. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches, focusing on deep learning-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T16:32:45Z)
• A Systematic Literature Review on Process-Aware Recommender Systems [0.0]
  This paper aims to identify and analyze the published studies on process-aware recommender system techniques. A systematic review was conducted on 33 academic articles published between 2008 and 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-30T19:56:29Z)
• A Survey of Deep Learning Approaches for OCR and Document Understanding [68.65995739708525]
  We review different techniques for document understanding for documents written in English. We consolidate methodologies present in literature to act as a jumping-off point for researchers exploring this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-27T03:05:59Z)
• A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
  The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021. We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.