Leveraging Language Models for Emotion and Behavior Analysis in Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06874v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:11:53 GMT
• Title: Leveraging Language Models for Emotion and Behavior Analysis in Education
• Authors: Kaito Tanaka, Benjamin Tan, Brian Wong,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a novel method leveraging large language models (LLMs) and prompt engineering to analyze textual data from students. Our approach utilizes tailored prompts to guide LLMs in detecting emotional and engagement states, providing a non-intrusive and scalable solution.
• Score: 4.219163079329444
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The analysis of students' emotions and behaviors is crucial for enhancing learning outcomes and personalizing educational experiences. Traditional methods often rely on intrusive visual and physiological data collection, posing privacy concerns and scalability issues. This paper proposes a novel method leveraging large language models (LLMs) and prompt engineering to analyze textual data from students. Our approach utilizes tailored prompts to guide LLMs in detecting emotional and engagement states, providing a non-intrusive and scalable solution. We conducted experiments using Qwen, ChatGPT, Claude2, and GPT-4, comparing our method against baseline models and chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. Results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms the baselines in both accuracy and contextual understanding. This study highlights the potential of LLMs combined with prompt engineering to offer practical and effective tools for educational emotion and behavior analysis.

Related papers

• LLM-SEM: A Sentiment-Based Student Engagement Metric Using LLMS for E-Learning Platforms [0.0]
  LLM-SEM (Language Model-Based Student Engagement Metric) is a novel approach that leverages video metadata and sentiment analysis of student comments to measure engagement. We generate high-quality sentiment predictions to mitigate text fuzziness and normalize key features such as views and likes. Our holistic method combines comprehensive metadata with sentiment polarity scores to gauge engagement at both the course and lesson levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T12:01:53Z)
• Uncovering Student Engagement Patterns in Moodle with Interpretable Machine Learning [0.0]
  This study introduces a methodology for quantifying engagement across an entire module using virtual learning environment (VLE) activity log data. Using study session frequency, immediacy, and diversity, we create a cumulative engagement metric. In a case study of a computing module at University College London's Department of Statistical Science, we examine how delivery methods impact student behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T14:47:25Z)
• Federated Learning driven Large Language Models for Swarm Intelligence: A Survey [2.769238399659845]
  Federated learning (FL) offers a compelling framework for training large language models (LLMs) We focus on machine unlearning, a crucial aspect for complying with privacy regulations like the Right to be Forgotten. We explore various strategies that enable effective unlearning, such as perturbation techniques, model decomposition, and incremental learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T08:40:58Z)
• Interactive Analysis of LLMs using Meaningful Counterfactuals [22.755345889167934]
  Counterfactual examples are useful for exploring the decision boundaries of machine learning models. How can we apply counterfactual-based methods to analyze and explain LLMs? We propose a novel algorithm for generating batches of complete and meaningful textual counterfactuals. In our experiments, 97.2% of the counterfactuals are grammatically correct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T19:57:03Z)
• Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
  We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes. We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function. Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z)
• Visual In-Context Learning for Large Vision-Language Models [62.5507897575317]
  In Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) the efficacy of In-Context Learning (ICL) remains limited by challenges in cross-modal interactions and representation disparities. We introduce a novel Visual In-Context Learning (VICL) method comprising Visual Demonstration Retrieval, Intent-Oriented Image Summarization, and Intent-Oriented Demonstration Composition. Our approach retrieves images via ''Retrieval & Rerank'' paradigm, summarises images with task intent and task-specific visual parsing, and composes language-based demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T12:43:38Z)
• C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction [54.39470114243744]
  c-ICL is a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations. Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T11:28:08Z)
• RLIF: Interactive Imitation Learning as Reinforcement Learning [56.997263135104504]
  We show how off-policy reinforcement learning can enable improved performance under assumptions that are similar but potentially even more practical than those of interactive imitation learning. Our proposed method uses reinforcement learning with user intervention signals themselves as rewards. This relaxes the assumption that intervening experts in interactive imitation learning should be near-optimal and enables the algorithm to learn behaviors that improve over the potential suboptimal human expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T21:05:21Z)
• Self-training Strategies for Sentiment Analysis: An Empirical Study [7.416913210816592]
  Self-training is an economical and efficient technique for developing sentiment analysis models. We compare several self-training strategies with the intervention of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T21:42:46Z)
• MinT: Boosting Generalization in Mathematical Reasoning via Multi-View Fine-Tuning [53.90744622542961]
  Reasoning in mathematical domains remains a significant challenge for small language models (LMs) We introduce a new method that exploits existing mathematical problem datasets with diverse annotation styles. Experimental results show that our strategy enables a LLaMA-7B model to outperform prior approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T05:41:53Z)
• Iterative Forward Tuning Boosts In-Context Learning in Language Models [88.25013390669845]
  In this study, we introduce a novel two-stage framework to boost in-context learning in large language models (LLMs) Specifically, our framework delineates the ICL process into two distinct stages: Deep-Thinking and test stages. The Deep-Thinking stage incorporates a unique attention mechanism, i.e., iterative enhanced attention, which enables multiple rounds of information accumulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T13:18:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.