Language Models as Models of Language

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07144v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 18:26:04 GMT
• Title: Language Models as Models of Language
• Authors: Raphaël Millière,
• Abstract summary: This chapter critically examines the potential contributions of modern language models to theoretical linguistics. I review a growing body of empirical evidence suggesting that language models can learn hierarchical syntactic structure and exhibit sensitivity to various linguistic phenomena. I conclude that closer collaboration between theoretical linguists and computational researchers could yield valuable insights.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This chapter critically examines the potential contributions of modern language models to theoretical linguistics. Despite their focus on engineering goals, these models' ability to acquire sophisticated linguistic knowledge from mere exposure to data warrants a careful reassessment of their relevance to linguistic theory. I review a growing body of empirical evidence suggesting that language models can learn hierarchical syntactic structure and exhibit sensitivity to various linguistic phenomena, even when trained on developmentally plausible amounts of data. While the competence/performance distinction has been invoked to dismiss the relevance of such models to linguistic theory, I argue that this assessment may be premature. By carefully controlling learning conditions and making use of causal intervention methods, experiments with language models can potentially constrain hypotheses about language acquisition and competence. I conclude that closer collaboration between theoretical linguists and computational researchers could yield valuable insights, particularly in advancing debates about linguistic nativism.

Related papers

• Trustworthy Alignment of Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning [84.94709351266557]
  We focus on the trustworthiness of language models with respect to retrieval augmentation. We deem that retrieval-augmented language models have the inherent capabilities of supplying response according to both contextual and parametric knowledge. Inspired by aligning language models with human preference, we take the first step towards aligning retrieval-augmented language models to a status where it responds relying merely on the external evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T09:25:21Z)
• The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Text [29.586404361715054]
  This study investigates the consequences of training language models on synthetic data generated by their predecessors. Our findings reveal a consistent decrease in the diversity of the model outputs through successive iterations. Our study highlights the need for careful consideration of the long-term effects of such training approaches on the linguistic capabilities of language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T11:31:50Z)
• Formal Aspects of Language Modeling [74.16212987886013]
  Large language models have become one of the most commonly deployed NLP inventions. These notes are the accompaniment to the theoretical portion of the ETH Z"urich course on large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T20:21:42Z)
• BabySLM: language-acquisition-friendly benchmark of self-supervised spoken language models [56.93604813379634]
  Self-supervised techniques for learning speech representations have been shown to develop linguistic competence from exposure to speech without the need for human labels. We propose a language-acquisition-friendly benchmark to probe spoken language models at the lexical and syntactic levels. We highlight two exciting challenges that need to be addressed for further progress: bridging the gap between text and speech and between clean speech and in-the-wild speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T12:54:38Z)
• Large Linguistic Models: Analyzing theoretical linguistic abilities of LLMs [7.4815059492034335]
  We show that large language models can generate coherent and valid formal analyses of linguistic data. We focus on three subfields of formal linguistics: syntax, phonology, and semantics. This line of inquiry exemplifies behavioral interpretability of deep learning, where models' representations are accessed by explicit prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T17:09:33Z)
• Dissociating language and thought in large language models [52.39241645471213]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have come closest among all models to date to mastering human language. We ground this distinction in human neuroscience, which has shown that formal and functional competence rely on different neural mechanisms. Although LLMs are surprisingly good at formal competence, their performance on functional competence tasks remains spotty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T22:41:19Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language [69.59943454934799]
  Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse. It remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases. We introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T23:42:22Z)
• Curriculum: A Broad-Coverage Benchmark for Linguistic Phenomena in Natural Language Understanding [1.827510863075184]
  Curriculum is a new format of NLI benchmark for evaluation of broad-coverage linguistic phenomena. We show that this linguistic-phenomena-driven benchmark can serve as an effective tool for diagnosing model behavior and verifying model learning quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T10:32:03Z)
• Uncovering Constraint-Based Behavior in Neural Models via Targeted Fine-Tuning [9.391375268580806]
  We show that competing linguistic processes within a language obscure underlying linguistic knowledge. While human behavior has been found to be similar across languages, we find cross-linguistic variation in model behavior. Our results suggest that models need to learn both the linguistic constraints in a language and their relative ranking, with mismatches in either producing non-human-like behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T14:52:11Z)
• The Rediscovery Hypothesis: Language Models Need to Meet Linguistics [8.293055016429863]
  We study whether linguistic knowledge is a necessary condition for good performance of modern language models. We show that language models that are significantly compressed but perform well on their pretraining objectives retain good scores when probed for linguistic structures. This result supports the rediscovery hypothesis and leads to the second contribution of our paper: an information-theoretic framework that relates language modeling objective with linguistic information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T15:57:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.