Words Matter: Reducing Stigma in Online Conversations about Substance Use with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07873v1
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 01:00:28 GMT
• Title: Words Matter: Reducing Stigma in Online Conversations about Substance Use with Large Language Models
• Authors: Layla Bouzoubaa, Elham Aghakhani, Shadi Rezapour,
• Abstract summary: Stigma is a barrier to treatment for individuals struggling with substance use disorders (SUD) This study investigates how stigma manifests on social media, particularly Reddit, where anonymity can exacerbate discriminatory behaviors.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Stigma is a barrier to treatment for individuals struggling with substance use disorders (SUD), which leads to significantly lower treatment engagement rates. With only 7% of those affected receiving any form of help, societal stigma not only discourages individuals with SUD from seeking help but isolates them, hindering their recovery journey and perpetuating a cycle of shame and self-doubt. This study investigates how stigma manifests on social media, particularly Reddit, where anonymity can exacerbate discriminatory behaviors. We analyzed over 1.2 million posts, identifying 3,207 that exhibited stigmatizing language towards people who use substances (PWUS). Using Informed and Stylized LLMs, we develop a model for de-stigmatization of these expressions into empathetic language, resulting in 1,649 reformed phrase pairs. Our paper contributes to the field by proposing a computational framework for analyzing stigma and destigmatizing online content, and delving into the linguistic features that propagate stigma towards PWUS. Our work not only enhances understanding of stigma's manifestations online but also provides practical tools for fostering a more supportive digital environment for those affected by SUD. Code and data will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

Related papers

• The Impact of Speech Anonymization on Pathology and Its Limits [6.687980678659259]
  This study investigates anonymization's impact on pathological speech across over 2,700 speakers from multiple German institutions. Specific disorders such as Dysarthria, Dysphonia, and Cleft Lip and Palate experienced minimal utility changes, while Dysglossia showed slight improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T18:06:35Z)
• Beyond Hate Speech: NLP's Challenges and Opportunities in Uncovering Dehumanizing Language [11.946719280041789]
  This paper evaluates the performance of cutting-edge NLP models, including GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and LLAMA-2 in identifying dehumanizing language. Our findings reveal that while these models demonstrate potential, achieving a 70% accuracy rate in distinguishing dehumanizing language from broader hate speech, they also display biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T13:57:36Z)
• Tokenization Matters: Navigating Data-Scarce Tokenization for Gender Inclusive Language Technologies [75.85462924188076]
  Gender-inclusive NLP research has documented the harmful limitations of gender binary-centric large language models (LLM) We find that misgendering is significantly influenced by Byte-Pair (BPE) tokenization. We propose two techniques: (1) pronoun tokenization parity, a method to enforce consistent tokenization across gendered pronouns, and (2) utilizing pre-existing LLM pronoun knowledge to improve neopronoun proficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T01:28:46Z)
• Diagnosing and Debiasing Corpus-Based Political Bias and Insults in GPT2 [0.0]
  Training large language models (LLMs) on extensive, unfiltered corpora sourced from the internet is a common and advantageous practice. Recent research shows that generative pretrained transformer (GPT) language models can recognize their own biases and detect toxicity in generated content. This study investigates the efficacy of the diagnosing-debiasing approach in mitigating two additional types of biases: insults and political bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T01:20:08Z)
• Locally Differentially Private Document Generation Using Zero Shot Prompting [61.20953109732442]
  We propose a locally differentially private mechanism called DP-Prompt to counter author de-anonymization attacks. When DP-Prompt is used with a powerful language model like ChatGPT (gpt-3.5), we observe a notable reduction in the success rate of de-anonymization attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T18:25:13Z)
• Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Prompting [64.80538055623842]
  sociodemographic prompting is a technique that steers the output of prompt-based models towards answers that humans with specific sociodemographic profiles would give. We show that sociodemographic information affects model predictions and can be beneficial for improving zero-shot learning in subjective NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T15:42:06Z)
• Critical Behavioral Traits Foster Peer Engagement in Online Mental Health Communities [28.17719749654601]
  We introduce BeCOPE, a novel behavior encoded Peer counseling dataset comprising over 10,118 posts and 58,279 comments sourced from 21 mental health-specific subreddits. Our analysis indicates the prominence of self-criticism'' as the most prevalent form of criticism expressed by help-seekers, accounting for a significant 43% of interactions. We highlight the pivotal role of well-articulated problem descriptions, showing that superior readability effectively doubles the likelihood of receiving the sought-after support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T14:00:12Z)
• Lived Experience Matters: Automatic Detection of Stigma on Social Media Toward People Who Use Substances [1.7378386177263254]
  Stigma toward people who use substances (PWUS) is a leading barrier to seeking treatment. This paper explores stigma toward PWUS using a data set of roughly 5,000 public Reddit posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-04T02:26:08Z)
• Semantic Similarity Models for Depression Severity Estimation [53.72188878602294]
  This paper presents an efficient semantic pipeline to study depression severity in individuals based on their social media writings. We use test user sentences for producing semantic rankings over an index of representative training sentences corresponding to depressive symptoms and severity levels. We evaluate our methods on two Reddit-based benchmarks, achieving 30% improvement over state of the art in terms of measuring depression severity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T18:47:26Z)
• Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
  We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past. We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers. These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z)
• A Framework for the Computational Linguistic Analysis of Dehumanization [52.735780962665814]
  We analyze discussions of LGBTQ people in the New York Times from 1986 to 2015. We find increasingly humanizing descriptions of LGBTQ people over time. The ability to analyze dehumanizing language at a large scale has implications for automatically detecting and understanding media bias as well as abusive language online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-06T03:02:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.