Multimodal Causal Reasoning Benchmark: Challenging Vision Large Language Models to Infer Causal Links Between Siamese Images
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08105v1
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 12:04:32 GMT
- Title: Multimodal Causal Reasoning Benchmark: Challenging Vision Large Language Models to Infer Causal Links Between Siamese Images
- Authors: Zhiyuan Li, Heng Wang, Dongnan Liu, Chaoyi Zhang, Ao Ma, Jieting Long, Weidong Cai,
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel Multimodal Causal Reasoning benchmark, namely MuCR, to challenge Large Language Models.
Specifically, we introduce a prompt-driven image synthesis approach to create siamese images with embedded semantic causality and visual cues.
Our extensive experiments reveal that the current state-of-the-art VLLMs are not as skilled at multimodal causal reasoning as we might have hoped.
- Score: 19.923665989164387
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased exceptional ability in causal reasoning from textual information. However, will these causalities remain straightforward for Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) when only visual hints are provided? Motivated by this, we propose a novel Multimodal Causal Reasoning benchmark, namely MuCR, to challenge VLLMs to infer semantic cause-and-effect relationship when solely relying on visual cues such as action, appearance, clothing, and environment. Specifically, we introduce a prompt-driven image synthesis approach to create siamese images with embedded semantic causality and visual cues, which can effectively evaluate VLLMs' causal reasoning capabilities. Additionally, we develop tailored metrics from multiple perspectives, including image-level match, phrase-level understanding, and sentence-level explanation, to comprehensively assess VLLMs' comprehension abilities. Our extensive experiments reveal that the current state-of-the-art VLLMs are not as skilled at multimodal causal reasoning as we might have hoped. Furthermore, we perform a comprehensive analysis to understand these models' shortcomings from different views and suggest directions for future research. We hope MuCR can serve as a valuable resource and foundational benchmark in multimodal causal reasoning research. The project is available at: https://github.com/Zhiyuan-Li-John/MuCR
Related papers
- ProReason: Multi-Modal Proactive Reasoning with Decoupled Eyesight and Wisdom [42.03770972100087]
We introduce a novel visual reasoning framework named ProReason.
ProReason features multi-run proactive perception and decoupled vision-reasoning capabilities.
Our experiments demonstrate that ProReason outperforms both existing multi-step reasoning frameworks and passive peer methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T03:22:06Z) - Enhancing Advanced Visual Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models [20.32900494896848]
Recent advancements in Vision-Language (VL) research have sparked new benchmarks for complex visual reasoning.
We propose Complex Visual Reasoning Large Language Models (CVR-LLM)
Our approach transforms images into detailed, context-aware descriptions using an iterative self-refinement loop.
We also introduce a novel multi-modal in-context learning (ICL) methodology to enhance LLMs' contextual understanding and reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-21T02:10:19Z) - Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning [15.296263261737026]
We introduce a Multi-Image MIRB Benchmark to evaluate visual language models' ability to compare, analyze, and reason across multiple images.
Our benchmark encompasses four categories: perception, visual world knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning.
We demonstrate that while open-source VLMs were shown to approach the GPT-4V in single-image tasks, a significant gap remains in multi-image reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T16:02:18Z) - Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks.
We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture.
Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z) - RelationVLM: Making Large Vision-Language Models Understand Visual Relations [66.70252936043688]
We present RelationVLM, a large vision-language model capable of comprehending various levels and types of relations whether across multiple images or within a video.
Specifically, we devise a multi-stage relation-aware training scheme and a series of corresponding data configuration strategies to bestow RelationVLM with the capabilities of understanding semantic relations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T15:01:19Z) - NPHardEval4V: A Dynamic Reasoning Benchmark of Multimodal Large Language
Models [34.91372939329467]
We introduce a benchmark, NPHardEval4V, to evaluate the pure reasoning abilities of MLLMs.
Our findings reveal significant discrepancies in reasoning abilities across different models.
We also investigate the impact of different prompting styles, including visual, text, and combined visual and text prompts, on the reasoning abilities of MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-04T07:10:31Z) - CODIS: Benchmarking Context-Dependent Visual Comprehension for Multimodal Large Language Models [58.95889895912716]
We introduce a new benchmark, named as CODIS, designed to assess the ability of models to use context provided in free-form text to enhance visual comprehension.
Our findings indicate that MLLMs consistently fall short of human performance on this benchmark.
This underscores the pressing need to enhance the ability of MLLMs to comprehend visuals in a context-dependent manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T08:21:12Z) - Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs [50.77984109941538]
Our research reveals that the visual capabilities in recent multimodal LLMs still exhibit systematic shortcomings.
We identify ''CLIP-blind pairs'' - images that CLIP perceives as similar despite their clear visual differences.
We evaluate various CLIP-based vision-and-language models and found a notable correlation between visual patterns that challenge CLIP models and those problematic for multimodal LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-11T18:58:36Z) - Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models [50.653838482083614]
This paper introduces a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks.
MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-03T16:39:36Z) - See, Think, Confirm: Interactive Prompting Between Vision and Language
Models for Knowledge-based Visual Reasoning [60.43585179885355]
We propose a novel framework named Interactive Prompting Visual Reasoner (IPVR) for few-shot knowledge-based visual reasoning.
IPVR contains three stages, see, think and confirm.
We conduct experiments on a range of knowledge-based visual reasoning datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-12T18:59:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.