NPHardEval4V: A Dynamic Reasoning Benchmark of Multimodal Large Language
Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01777v2
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 18:26:04 GMT
- Title: NPHardEval4V: A Dynamic Reasoning Benchmark of Multimodal Large Language
Models
- Authors: Lizhou Fan, Wenyue Hua, Xiang Li, Kaijie Zhu, Mingyu Jin, Lingyao Li,
Haoyang Ling, Jinkui Chi, Jindong Wang, Xin Ma, Yongfeng Zhang
- Abstract summary: We introduce a benchmark, NPHardEval4V, to evaluate the pure reasoning abilities of MLLMs.
Our findings reveal significant discrepancies in reasoning abilities across different models.
We also investigate the impact of different prompting styles, including visual, text, and combined visual and text prompts, on the reasoning abilities of MLLMs.
- Score: 34.91372939329467
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Understanding the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models
(MLLMs) is an important area of research. In this study, we introduce a dynamic
benchmark, NPHardEval4V, aimed at addressing the existing gaps in evaluating
the pure reasoning abilities of MLLMs. Our benchmark aims to provide a venue to
disentangle the effect of various factors such as image recognition and
instruction following, from the overall performance of the models, allowing us
to focus solely on evaluating their reasoning abilities. It is built by
converting textual description of questions from NPHardEval to image
representations. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies in reasoning
abilities across different models and highlight the relatively weak performance
of MLLMs compared to LLMs in terms of reasoning. We also investigate the impact
of different prompting styles, including visual, text, and combined visual and
text prompts, on the reasoning abilities of MLLMs, demonstrating the different
impacts of multimodal inputs in model performance. Unlike traditional
benchmarks, which focus primarily on static evaluations, our benchmark will be
updated monthly to prevent overfitting and ensure a more authentic and
fine-grained evaluation of the models. We believe that this benchmark can aid
in understanding and guide the further development of reasoning abilities in
MLLMs. The benchmark dataset and code are available at
https://github.com/lizhouf/NPHardEval4V
Related papers
- CounterBench: A Benchmark for Counterfactuals Reasoning in Large Language Models [5.409370027524351]
We evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in counterfactual reasoning.
We introduce a new benchmark dataset, CounterBench, comprising 1K counterfactual reasoning questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-16T06:19:37Z) - Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark [73.27104042215207]
We introduce EMMA, a benchmark targeting organic multimodal reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding.
EMMA tasks demand advanced cross-modal reasoning that cannot be addressed by reasoning independently in each modality.
Our evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs on EMMA reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal and multi-step reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T18:55:52Z) - A Survey on Benchmarks of Multimodal Large Language Models [65.87641718350639]
This paper presents a comprehensive review of 200 benchmarks and evaluations for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)
We focus on (1)perception and understanding, (2)cognition and reasoning, (3)specific domains, (4)key capabilities, and (5)other modalities.
Our key argument is that evaluation should be regarded as a crucial discipline to support the development of MLLMs better.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-16T09:52:02Z) - Multimodal Causal Reasoning Benchmark: Challenging Vision Large Language Models to Infer Causal Links Between Siamese Images [19.923665989164387]
We propose a novel Multimodal Causal Reasoning benchmark, namely MuCR, to challenge Large Language Models.
Specifically, we introduce a prompt-driven image synthesis approach to create siamese images with embedded semantic causality and visual cues.
Our extensive experiments reveal that the current state-of-the-art VLLMs are not as skilled at multimodal causal reasoning as we might have hoped.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-15T12:04:32Z) - Evaluating Linguistic Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs in the Lens of Few-Shot Learning [15.919493497867567]
This study aims to evaluate the performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the VALSE benchmark.
We conducted a comprehensive assessment of state-of-the-art MLLMs, varying in model size and pretraining datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T11:26:47Z) - RUPBench: Benchmarking Reasoning Under Perturbations for Robustness Evaluation in Large Language Models [12.112914393948415]
We present RUPBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) across diverse reasoning tasks.
Our benchmark incorporates 15 reasoning datasets, categorized into commonsense, arithmetic, logical, and knowledge-intensive reasoning.
By examining the performance of state-of-the-art LLMs such as GPT-4o, Llama3, Phi-3, and Gemma on both original and perturbed datasets, we provide a detailed analysis of their robustness and error patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T17:26:44Z) - CODIS: Benchmarking Context-Dependent Visual Comprehension for Multimodal Large Language Models [58.95889895912716]
We introduce a new benchmark, named as CODIS, designed to assess the ability of models to use context provided in free-form text to enhance visual comprehension.
Our findings indicate that MLLMs consistently fall short of human performance on this benchmark.
This underscores the pressing need to enhance the ability of MLLMs to comprehend visuals in a context-dependent manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T08:21:12Z) - Mementos: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model
Reasoning over Image Sequences [80.54979242912944]
This paper introduces Mementos, a new benchmark designed to assess MLLMs' sequential image reasoning abilities.
We find that MLLMs struggle to accurately describe dynamic information about given image sequences, often leading to hallucinations/misrepresentations of objects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-19T07:10:13Z) - CLOMO: Counterfactual Logical Modification with Large Language Models [109.60793869938534]
We introduce a novel task, Counterfactual Logical Modification (CLOMO), and a high-quality human-annotated benchmark.
In this task, LLMs must adeptly alter a given argumentative text to uphold a predetermined logical relationship.
We propose an innovative evaluation metric, the Self-Evaluation Score (SES), to directly evaluate the natural language output of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-29T08:29:54Z) - InfiMM-Eval: Complex Open-Ended Reasoning Evaluation For Multi-Modal
Large Language Models [50.03163753638256]
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly prominent in the field of artificial intelligence.
Our benchmark comprises three key reasoning categories: deductive, abductive, and analogical reasoning.
We evaluate a selection of representative MLLMs using this rigorously developed open-ended multi-step elaborate reasoning benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-20T07:06:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.