Value Alignment from Unstructured Text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10392v1
• Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:22:08 GMT
• Title: Value Alignment from Unstructured Text
• Authors: Inkit Padhi, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Prasanna Sattigeri, Manish Nagireddy, Pierre Dognin, Kush R. Varshney,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a systematic end-to-end methodology for aligning large language models (LLMs) to the implicit and explicit values represented in unstructured text data. Our proposed approach leverages the use of scalable synthetic data generation techniques to effectively align the model to the values present in the unstructured data. Our approach credibly aligns LLMs to the values embedded within documents, and shows improved performance against other approaches.
• Score: 32.9140028463247
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Aligning large language models (LLMs) to value systems has emerged as a significant area of research within the fields of AI and NLP. Currently, this alignment process relies on the availability of high-quality supervised and preference data, which can be both time-consuming and expensive to curate or annotate. In this paper, we introduce a systematic end-to-end methodology for aligning LLMs to the implicit and explicit values represented in unstructured text data. Our proposed approach leverages the use of scalable synthetic data generation techniques to effectively align the model to the values present in the unstructured data. Through two distinct use-cases, we demonstrate the efficiency of our methodology on the Mistral-7B-Instruct model. Our approach credibly aligns LLMs to the values embedded within documents, and shows improved performance against other approaches, as quantified through the use of automatic metrics and win rates.

Related papers

• Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuning [71.2981957820888]
  We propose a novel Star-Agents framework, which automates the enhancement of data quality across datasets. The framework initially generates diverse instruction data with multiple LLM agents through a bespoke sampling method. The generated data undergo a rigorous evaluation using a dual-model method that assesses both difficulty and quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T02:30:53Z)
• Efficient Alignment of Large Language Models via Data Sampling [0.4915744683251149]
  We propose an information theory-based methodology for efficient alignment by identifying a small high quality subset. We find that the model aligned using our proposed methodology outperforms other sampling methods and performs comparable to the model aligned with the full dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T19:36:15Z)
• Towards More Effective Table-to-Text Generation: Assessing In-Context Learning and Self-Evaluation with Open-Source Models [0.0]
  This study explores the effectiveness of various in-context learning strategies in language models (LMs) across benchmark datasets. We employ a large language model (LLM) self-evaluation approach using chain-of-thought reasoning and assess its correlation with human-aligned metrics like BERTScore. Our findings highlight the significant impact of examples in improving table-to-text generation and suggest that, while LLM self-evaluation has potential, its current alignment with human judgment could be enhanced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T09:19:42Z)
• Model Merging and Safety Alignment: One Bad Model Spoils the Bunch [70.614652904151]
  Merging Large Language Models (LLMs) is a cost-effective technique for combining multiple expert LLMs into a single versatile model. Current approaches often overlook the importance of safety alignment during merging, leading to highly misaligned models. We evaluate several popular model merging techniques, demonstrating that existing methods do not only transfer domain expertise but also propagate misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:59:58Z)
• Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment [104.18002641195442]
  We introduce Self-Augmented Preference Optimization (SAPO), an effective and scalable training paradigm that does not require existing paired data. Building on the self-play concept, which autonomously generates negative responses, we further incorporate an off-policy learning pipeline to enhance data exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:21:04Z)
• CLAIM Your Data: Enhancing Imputation Accuracy with Contextual Large Language Models [0.18416014644193068]
  This paper introduces the Contextual Language model for Accurate Imputation Method (CLAIM) Unlike traditional imputation methods, CLAIM utilizes contextually relevant natural language descriptors to fill missing values. Our evaluations across diverse datasets and missingness patterns reveal CLAIM's superior performance over existing imputation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T00:08:29Z)
• RECOST: External Knowledge Guided Data-efficient Instruction Tuning [25.985023475991625]
  We argue that most current data-efficient instruction-tuning methods are highly dependent on the quality of the original instruction-tuning dataset. We propose a framework dubbed as textbfRECOST, which integrates external-knowledge-base re-ranking and diversity-consistent sampling into a single pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:47:36Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
• DEALIO: Data-Efficient Adversarial Learning for Imitation from Observation [57.358212277226315]
  In imitation learning from observation IfO, a learning agent seeks to imitate a demonstrating agent using only observations of the demonstrated behavior without access to the control signals generated by the demonstrator. Recent methods based on adversarial imitation learning have led to state-of-the-art performance on IfO problems, but they typically suffer from high sample complexity due to a reliance on data-inefficient, model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. This issue makes them impractical to deploy in real-world settings, where gathering samples can incur high costs in terms of time, energy, and risk. We propose a more data-efficient IfO algorithm
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T23:46:32Z)
• SDA: Improving Text Generation with Self Data Augmentation [88.24594090105899]
  We propose to improve the standard maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) paradigm by incorporating a self-imitation-learning phase for automatic data augmentation. Unlike most existing sentence-level augmentation strategies, our method is more general and could be easily adapted to any MLE-based training procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T01:15:57Z)
• Semantics Altering Modifications for Evaluating Comprehension in Machine Reading [1.1355639618103164]
  We investigate whether machine reading comprehension models are able to correctly process Semantics Altering Modifications. We present a method to automatically generate and align challenge sets featuring original and altered examples. We apply the methodology in order to evaluate MRC models with regard to their capability to correctly process SAM-enriched data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T21:00:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.