MTFinEval:A Multi-domain Chinese Financial Benchmark with Eurypalynous questions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10921v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 15:04:38 GMT
• Title: MTFinEval:A Multi-domain Chinese Financial Benchmark with Eurypalynous questions
• Authors: Xinyu Liu, Ke Jin,
• Abstract summary: We have compiled a new benchmark, MTFinEval, focusing on the LLMs' basic knowledge of economics. MTFinEval comprise 360 questions refined from six major disciplines of economics, and reflect capabilities more comprehensively. Experiment result shows all LLMs perform poorly on MTFinEval, which proves that our benchmark built on basic knowledge is very successful.
• Score: 19.755793171557123
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the emergence of more and more economy-specific LLMS, how to measure whether they can be safely invested in production becomes a problem. Previous research has primarily focused on evaluating the performance of LLMs within specific application scenarios. However, these benchmarks cannot reflect the theoretical level and generalization ability, and the backward datasets are increasingly unsuitable for problems in real scenarios. In this paper, we have compiled a new benchmark, MTFinEval, focusing on the LLMs' basic knowledge of economics, which can always be used as a basis for judgment. To examine only theoretical knowledge as much as possible, MTFinEval is build with foundational questions from university textbooks,and exam papers in economics and management major. Aware of the overall performance of LLMs do not depend solely on one subdiscipline of economics, MTFinEval comprise 360 questions refined from six major disciplines of economics, and reflect capabilities more comprehensively. Experiment result shows all LLMs perform poorly on MTFinEval, which proves that our benchmark built on basic knowledge is very successful. Our research not only offers guidance for selecting the appropriate LLM for specific use cases, but also put forward increase the rigor reliability of LLMs from the basics.

Related papers

• CLR-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models in College-level Reasoning [17.081788240112417]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their remarkable performance across various language understanding tasks. We present CLR-Bench to comprehensively evaluate the LLMs in complex college-level reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T04:55:08Z)
• Forecasting Credit Ratings: A Case Study where Traditional Methods Outperform Generative LLMs [17.109522466982476]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to perform well for many downstream tasks. This paper investigates how well LLMs perform in the task of forecasting corporate credit ratings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T20:30:55Z)
• How Reliable are LLMs as Knowledge Bases? Re-thinking Facutality and Consistency [60.25969380388974]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as knowledge bases (KBs) Current evaluation methods focus too narrowly on knowledge retention, overlooking other crucial criteria for reliable performance. We propose new criteria and metrics to quantify factuality and consistency, leading to a final reliability score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T15:20:18Z)
• CFinBench: A Comprehensive Chinese Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models [61.324062412648075]
  CFinBench is an evaluation benchmark for assessing the financial knowledge of large language models (LLMs) under Chinese context. It comprises 99,100 questions spanning 43 second-level categories with 3 question types: single-choice, multiple-choice and judgment. The results show that GPT4 and some Chinese-oriented models lead the benchmark, with the highest average accuracy being 60.16%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T14:34:36Z)
• Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificity [61.54815512469125]
  This survey addresses the crucial issue of factuality in Large Language Models (LLMs) As LLMs find applications across diverse domains, the reliability and accuracy of their outputs become vital.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T14:18:03Z)
• Enhancing Financial Sentiment Analysis via Retrieval Augmented Large Language Models [11.154814189699735]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on extensive corpora have demonstrated superior performance across various NLP tasks. We introduce a retrieval-augmented LLMs framework for financial sentiment analysis. Our approach achieves 15% to 48% performance gain in accuracy and F1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T05:40:23Z)
• Empowering Many, Biasing a Few: Generalist Credit Scoring through Large Language Models [53.620827459684094]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have great potential for credit scoring tasks, with strong generalization ability across multiple tasks. We propose the first open-source comprehensive framework for exploring LLMs for credit scoring. We then propose the first Credit and Risk Assessment Large Language Model (CALM) by instruction tuning, tailored to the nuanced demands of various financial risk assessment tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T03:50:34Z)
• Through the Lens of Core Competency: Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models [27.271533306818732]
  Large language model (LLM) has excellent performance and wide practical uses. Existing evaluation tasks are difficult to keep up with the wide range of applications in real-world scenarios. We summarize 4 core competencies of LLM, including reasoning, knowledge, reliability, and safety. Under this competency architecture, similar tasks are combined to reflect corresponding ability, while new tasks can also be easily added into the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T17:40:34Z)
• SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models [70.5763210869525]
  We introduce an expansive benchmark suite SciBench for Large Language Model (LLM) SciBench contains a dataset featuring a range of collegiate-level scientific problems from mathematics, chemistry, and physics domains. The results reveal that the current LLMs fall short of delivering satisfactory performance, with the best overall score of merely 43.22%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T07:01:57Z)
• A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models [87.60417393701331]
  Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in both academia and industry. This paper focuses on three key dimensions: what to evaluate, where to evaluate, and how to evaluate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T16:28:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.