Scaling Law with Learning Rate Annealing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11029v2
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:56:14 GMT
• Title: Scaling Law with Learning Rate Annealing
• Authors: Howe Tissue, Venus Wang, Lu Wang,
• Abstract summary: Cross-entropy loss curves of neural language models adhere to a scaling law with learning rate (LR) annealing over training steps. Applying the scaling law with LR annealing and fitting only one or two training curves, we can accurately predict the loss at any given step across any learning rate (LRS)
• Score: 4.121865876406014
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We find that the cross-entropy loss curves of neural language models empirically adhere to a scaling law with learning rate (LR) annealing over training steps: $$L(s) = L_0 + A\cdot S_1^{-\alpha} - C\cdot S_2,$$ where $L(s)$ is the validation loss at step $s$, $S_1$ is the area under the LR curve, $S_2$ is the LR annealing area, and $L_0$, $A$, $C$, $\alpha$ are constant parameters. This formulation takes into account two factors: (1) power-law scaling over data size, and (2) the additional loss reduction during LR annealing. Therefore, this formulation can describe the full loss curve at each step, rather than the single loss point at the end of training. Applying the scaling law with LR annealing and fitting only one or two training curves, we can accurately predict the loss at any given step across any learning rate scheduler (LRS). This approach significantly reduces computational cost in formulating scaling laws while providing more accuracy and expressiveness for training dynamics. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our findings hold across a range of hyper-parameters and model architectures, and our equation can extend to scaling effect of model sizes. Moreover, our formulation provides accurate theoretical verification and explanation for empirical results observed in numerous previous studies, particularly those focusing on LR schedule and annealing. We believe that this work is promising to enhance the understanding of LLM training dynamics while greatly democratizing scaling laws, and it can guide researchers in refining training strategies (e.g. critical LRS) for further LLMs.

Related papers

• Bayesian scaling laws for in-context learning [72.17734205418502]
  In-context learning (ICL) is a powerful technique for getting language models to perform complex tasks with no training updates. We show that ICL approximates a Bayesian learner and develop a family of novel Bayesian scaling laws for ICL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T21:45:22Z)
• Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMs [75.28559015477137]
  This work focuses on the pre-training loss as a more-efficient metric for performance estimation. We extend the power law analytical function to predict domain-specific pre-training loss based on FLOPs across data sources. We employ a two-layer neural network to model the non-linear relationship between multiple domain-specific loss and downstream performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T04:57:48Z)
• Scaling Optimal LR Across Token Horizons [81.29631219839311]
  We show how optimal learning rate depends on token horizon in LLM training. We also provide evidence that LLama-1 used too high LR, and estimate the performance hit from this.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T03:32:02Z)
• Temporal Scaling Law for Large Language Models [24.12384260752973]
  We propose the novel concept of Temporal Scaling Law, studying how the test loss of an LLM evolves as the training steps scale up. In contrast to modeling the test loss as a whole in a coarse-grained manner, we break it down and dive into the fine-grained test loss of each token position. We derive the much more precise temporal scaling law by studying the temporal patterns of the parameters in the dynamic hyperbolic-law.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T05:49:11Z)
• BiLLM: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization for LLMs [53.31402059062365]
  BiLLM is a groundbreaking 1-bit post-training quantization scheme tailored for pretrained large language models. It achieves for the first time high-accuracy inference (e.g. 8.41 perplexity on LLaMA2-70B) with only 1.08-bit weights across various LLMs families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T09:26:34Z)
• Layer-wise Adaptive Step-Sizes for Stochastic First-Order Methods for Deep Learning [8.173034693197351]
  We propose a new per-layer adaptive step-size procedure for first-order optimization methods in deep learning. The proposed approach exploits the layer-wise curvature information contained in the diagonal blocks of the Hessian in deep neural networks (DNNs) to compute adaptive step-sizes (i.e., LRs) for each layer. Numerical experiments show that SGD with momentum and AdamW combined with the proposed per-layer step-sizes are able to choose effective LR schedules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T04:12:55Z)
• Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Markov Decision Processes [80.89852729380425]
  We propose the first computationally efficient algorithm that achieves the nearly minimax optimal regret $tilde O(dsqrtH3K)$. Our work provides a complete answer to optimal RL with linear MDPs, and the developed algorithm and theoretical tools may be of independent interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T18:58:59Z)
• Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning [52.76230802067506]
  A novel model-free algorithm is proposed to minimize regret in episodic reinforcement learning. The proposed algorithm employs an em early-settled reference update rule, with the aid of two Q-learning sequences. The design principle of our early-settled variance reduction method might be of independent interest to other RL settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-09T21:13:48Z)
• Cost Function Unrolling in Unsupervised Optical Flow [6.656273171776146]
  This work focuses on the derivation of the Total Variation semi-norm commonly used in unsupervised cost functions. We derive a differentiable proxy to the hard L1 smoothness constraint in a novel iterative scheme which we refer to as Cost Unrolling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-30T14:10:03Z)
• Towards Understanding Label Smoothing [36.54164997035046]
  Label smoothing regularization (LSR) has a great success in deep neural networks by training algorithms. We show that an appropriate LSR can help to speed up convergence by reducing the variance. We propose a simple yet effective strategy, namely Two-Stage LAbel smoothing algorithm (TSLA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-20T20:36:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.