Related papers: Reply to Comment on "No Black Holes from Light" [arXiv:2408.06714]

Related papers

Comments on `Comment on Aurélien Drezet's defense of relational quantum mechanics' by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek Źukowski [0.0]
We respond to a recent comment by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek 'Zukowski regarding our work defending RQM against their previous assessment. We refute the analysis proposed by the authors and rephrase our previous study in order to clarify the remaining ambiguities in our rebuttal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T20:32:59Z)
Einstein's 1927 gedanken experiment: how to complete it and measure the collapse time of a spatially spread photon [55.2480439325792]
Einstein discussed a gedanken experiment involving a single photon diffracted at an aperture and impinging on a screen. He devised the example to support De Broglie's hypothesis of the pilot wave, and his own ideas on the incompleteness of the description of physical reality provided by Quantum Mechanics. Partial realizations of Einstein's example have been performed, but the complete experiment has not been attempted (for good practical reasons) yet.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T18:10:12Z)
Test of transient deviations from Quantum Mechanics in Bell's experiment [41.94295877935867]
The conflict between Quantum Mechanics (QM) and Local Realism is most noticeable in the correlations observed between distant regions of a spatially spread entangled state. It has been hypothesized that transient deviations (from the values predicted by QM) may be observed if the correlations are measured in a time shorter than L/c. We present the results of such a test performed on a specially designed optical Bell setup with a distance between stations up to 24 m in straight line.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T13:01:30Z)
A Reply to Makelov et al. (2023)'s "Interpretability Illusion" Arguments [59.87080148922358]
We argue that Makelov et al. (2023) see in practice are artifacts of their training and evaluation paradigms. Though we disagree with their core characterization, Makelov et al. (2023)'s examples and discussion have undoubtedly pushed the field of interpretability forward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-23T10:27:42Z)
Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman [2.1756081703276]
This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-23T00:41:39Z)
Reply to "Masanes-Galley-M\"uller and the State-Update Postulate" [0.0]
We argue that the criticism is unfounded. In particular, and in contrast to Stacey's claims, our proof does not assume linearity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-07T13:38:42Z)
Reply to `Comment on "Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions"' [0.0]
We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Th'eo S'epulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-19T08:06:15Z)
How John Wheeler lost his faith in the law [77.34726150561087]
We investigate how Wheeler reached the conclusion that gravitational collapse calls into question the lawfulness of physics. We show how Wheeler tried to develop a new worldview, rethinking in his own way the lessons of quantum mechanics as well as drawing inspiration from other disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-29T14:10:23Z)
A dialog on the fate of information in black hole evaporation [77.34726150561087]
We present two alternative perspectives for the resolution of Hawking's information puzzle in black hole evaporation. One of them is the central role played by the existence of the interior singularity that we expect to be replaced by a more fundamental quantum gravity formulation. Both views rely on the notion that the standard effective quantum field theoretic perspective would require some deep modifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-17T16:21:22Z)
On a gap in the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma and its consequences for the reversibility of quantum resources [51.243733928201024]
We show that the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma is not correct due to a gap in the argument leading to Lemma III.9. This puts into question a number of established results in the literature, in particular the reversibility of quantum entanglement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-05T17:46:05Z)
Comment on "Do Gedankenexperiments compel quantization of gravity" [0.0]
There is no conclusive theoretical argument that would require the quantization of the gravitational field. Efforts by Ryding, Aurell, and Pikovski to further establish the inconclusiveness of the question of necessity of quantization are futile.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-30T14:36:22Z)
Failed attempt to escape from the quantum pigeon conundrum [0.0]
Recent criticism of a quantum setup violating the pigeon counting principle is refuted. The quantum nature of the violation of the pigeonhole principle with pre-election and postselection is clarified.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-17T11:14:39Z)
Reply to Comment on "Strong Quantum Darwinism and Strong Independence are Equivalent to Spectrum Broadcast Structure" [77.34726150561087]
In a recent comment [Feller et. al. arXiv:2101.09186] on our Letter [Phys. Lett. 122, 010403], Feller et. al identified a mistake in our mathematical expression of "strong independence" for states that satisfy Spectrum Broadcast Structure. We concede that we wrote a mathematical condition that is necessary but not sufficient. However, we used the original and correct qualitative definition for "strong independence" throughout the paper and in our proofs, therefore the proofs and statements, aside from the aforementioned mathematical expression, remain correct.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-26T12:55:49Z)
Reply to "Comment on "Quantum Time Crystals from Hamiltonians with Long-Range Interactions"" [23.87373187143897]
In this reply we answer one-by-one all questions raised in the discussion. As for the ideological dispute, it brightly highlights a bizarre nature of time crystalline order in closed quantum systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-13T13:51:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.