Reply to "Masanes-Galley-M\"uller and the State-Update Postulate"

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03629v1
• Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 13:38:42 GMT
• Title: Reply to "Masanes-Galley-M\"uller and the State-Update Postulate"
• Authors: Thomas D. Galley, Llu\'is Masanes, Markus P. M\"uller
• Abstract summary: We argue that the criticism is unfounded. In particular, and in contrast to Stacey's claims, our proof does not assume linearity.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In a recent comment on the arXiv, Blake C. Stacey criticizes our derivation of the quantum state update rule in Nat. Commun. 10, 1361 (2019). Here we argue that the criticism is unfounded. In particular, and in contrast to Stacey's claims, our proof does not assume linearity.

Related papers

• Keep the Momentum: Conservation Laws beyond Euclidean Gradient Flows [28.287184613608435]
  We show that conservation laws for momentum-based dynamics exhibit temporal dependence. We also observe a "conservation loss" when transitioning from gradient flow to momentum dynamics. This phenomenon also manifests in non-Euclidean metrics, used e.g. for Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T15:59:55Z)
• Comment on "Comment on "Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor" " [50.591267188664666]
  We observe that the comment of [1, arXiv:2302.07897] is consistent with [2] on key points. The objections of [1] concern counterfactual scenarios outside of the experimentally implemented protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T17:45:47Z)
• Deterministic All-versus-nothing Proofs of Bell Nonlocality Induced from Qudit Non-stabilizer States [11.190823369797998]
  A kind of deterministic all-versus-nothing proof of Bell nonlocality induced from the qubit non-stabilizer state was proposed. Here we present an example induced from a specific four-qudit non-stabilizer state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T06:24:27Z)
• Masanes-Galley-M\"uller and the State-Update Postulate [0.0]
  Masanes, Galley and M"uller claim to have derived a unique rule for quantum state update consequent upon a measurement outcome. Their proof implicitly assumes its first step, namely that the state-update rule is linear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T04:31:41Z)
• Relative facts do not exist. Relational Quantum Mechanics is Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics. Response to the critique by Aur\'elien Drezet [0.0]
  We point out that our critical analysis of RQM was precisely based on the most recent formulation of RQM, and that the theses in the critique are based on neither RQM assumptions nor on our arguments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T14:13:56Z)
• A critical analysis of `Relative facts do not exist. Relational quantum mechanics is incompatible with quantum mechanics' by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek \'{Z}ukowski [0.0]
  We discuss a recent work by J.Lawrence et al.[arxiv.org/abs/2208.11793] criticizing relational quantum mechanics (RQM) and based on a famous nonlocality theorem. Here, we show that the claims presented in this recent work are unjustified and we debunk the analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T18:52:17Z)
• Reply to arXiv:2111.13357 ("The Quantum Eraser Non-Paradox'') [0.0]
  We argue that we have forgotten to consider superpositions of detector eigenstates. We also note that no one has ever observed such detector superpositions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-01T11:55:02Z)
• Reply to Comment on "Strong Quantum Darwinism and Strong Independence are Equivalent to Spectrum Broadcast Structure" [77.34726150561087]
  In a recent comment [Feller et. al. arXiv:2101.09186] on our Letter [Phys. Lett. 122, 010403], Feller et. al identified a mistake in our mathematical expression of "strong independence" for states that satisfy Spectrum Broadcast Structure. We concede that we wrote a mathematical condition that is necessary but not sufficient. However, we used the original and correct qualitative definition for "strong independence" throughout the paper and in our proofs, therefore the proofs and statements, aside from the aforementioned mathematical expression, remain correct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-26T12:55:49Z)
• The Time-Evolution of States in Quantum Mechanics [77.34726150561087]
  It is argued that the Schr"odinger equation does not yield a correct description of the quantum-mechanical time evolution of states of isolated (open) systems featuring events. A precise general law for the time evolution of states replacing the Schr"odinger equation is formulated within the so-called ETH-Approach to Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-04T16:09:10Z)
• A Black-Box Approach to Post-Quantum Zero-Knowledge in Constant Rounds [12.525959293825318]
  We construct a constant round interactive proof for NP that satisfies statistical soundness and black-box $epsilon$-zero-knowledge against quantum attacks. At the heart of our results is a new quantum rewinding technique that enables a simulator to extract a committed message of a malicious verifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-05T05:40:05Z)
• A response to criticisms on "CMB Constraints Cast a Shadow on CSL Model" [0.0]
  We explain why the arguments presented in [G. R. Bengochea, G. Leon, P. Pearle, and D. Sudarsky, arXiv:2008.05285, see also arXiv:2006.05313] are either incorrect or a confirmation of the robustness of our results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T11:50:07Z)
• Reply to "Comment on "Quantum Time Crystals from Hamiltonians with Long-Range Interactions"" [23.87373187143897]
  In this reply we answer one-by-one all questions raised in the discussion. As for the ideological dispute, it brightly highlights a bizarre nature of time crystalline order in closed quantum systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:51:01Z)
• Quantum-like modeling of the order effect in decision making: POVM viewpoint on the Wang-Busemeyer QQ-equality [77.34726150561087]
  Wang and Busemeyer invented a quantum model and approach as well as non-parametric equality (so-called QQ-equality) This note is to test the possibility to expand the Wang-Busemeyer model by considering questions which are mathematically represented by positive operator valued measures. But, we also showed that, in principle, it is possible to reduce expanded model to the original Wang-Busemeyer model by expanding the context of the questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2018-10-31T18:11:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.