Unlocking Sustainability Compliance: Characterizing the EU Taxonomy for Business Process Management

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11386v2
• Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:08:04 GMT
• Title: Unlocking Sustainability Compliance: Characterizing the EU Taxonomy for Business Process Management
• Authors: Finn Klessascheck, Stephan A. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Jan Mendling, Luise Pufahl,
• Abstract summary: The EU has developed the taxonomy of sustainable activities, which describes when exactly business practices can be considered sustainable. We investigate in how far these criteria can be used for conformance checking, that is, assessing in a data-driven manner, whether business process executions adhere to regulatory constraints. We find that many constraints of the taxonomy are useable for conformance checking, particularly in the sectors of energy, manufacturing, and transport.
• Score: 2.474551220017185
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: To promote sustainable business practices, and to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, the EU has developed the taxonomy of sustainable activities, which describes when exactly business practices can be considered sustainable. While the taxonomy has only been recently established, progressively more companies will have to report how much of their revenue was created via sustainably executed business processes. To help companies prepare to assess whether their business processes comply with the constraints outlined in the taxonomy, we investigate in how far these criteria can be used for conformance checking, that is, assessing in a data-driven manner, whether business process executions adhere to regulatory constraints. For this, we develop a few-shot learning pipeline to characterize the constraints of the taxonomy with the help of an LLM as to the process dimensions they relate to. We find that many constraints of the taxonomy are useable for conformance checking, particularly in the sectors of energy, manufacturing, and transport. This will aid companies in preparing to monitor regulatory compliance with the taxonomy automatically, by characterizing what kind of information they need to extract, and by providing a better understanding of sectors where such an assessment is feasible and where it is not.

Related papers

• Ethical and Scalable Automation: A Governance and Compliance Framework for Business Applications [0.0]
  This paper introduces a framework ensuring that AI must be ethical, controllable, viable, and desirable. Different case studies validate this framework by integrating AI in both academic and practical environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T12:39:28Z)
• RegNLP in Action: Facilitating Compliance Through Automated Information Retrieval and Answer Generation [51.998738311700095]
  Regulatory documents, characterized by their length, complexity and frequent updates, are challenging to interpret. RegNLP is a multidisciplinary subfield aimed at simplifying access to and interpretation of regulatory rules and obligations. ObliQA dataset contains 27,869 questions derived from the Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) financial regulation document collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T14:44:19Z)
• Carbon Market Simulation with Adaptive Mechanism Design [55.25103894620696]
  A carbon market is a market-based tool that incentivizes economic agents to align individual profits with the global utility. We propose an adaptive mechanism design framework, simulating the market using hierarchical, model-free multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) Numerical results show MARL enables government agents to balance productivity, equality, and carbon emissions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T05:08:51Z)
• SOPA: A Framework for Sustainability-Oriented Process Analysis and Re-design in Business Process Management [0.08192907805418582]
  We propose and study SOPA, a framework for sustainability-oriented process analysis and re-design. SOPA extends the BPM life cycle by use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for sustainability analysis in combination with Activity-based Costing (ABC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T11:02:23Z)
• Towards an Enforceable GDPR Specification [49.1574468325115]
  Privacy by Design (PbD) is prescribed by modern privacy regulations such as the EU's. One emerging technique to realize PbD is enforcement (RE) We present a set of requirements and an iterative methodology for creating formal specifications of legal provisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:38:51Z)
• Identification of Regulatory Requirements Relevant to Business Processes: A Comparative Study on Generative AI, Embedding-based Ranking, Crowd and Expert-driven Methods [10.899912290518648]
  This work examines how legal and domain experts can be assisted in the assessment of relevant requirements. We compare an embedding-based NLP ranking method, a generative AI method using GPT-4, and a crowdsourced method with the purely manual method of creating labels by experts. A gold standard is created for both BPMN2.0 processes and matched to real-world requirements from multiple regulatory documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T12:08:31Z)
• Accountability in Offline Reinforcement Learning: Explaining Decisions with a Corpus of Examples [70.84093873437425]
  This paper introduces the Accountable Offline Controller (AOC) that employs the offline dataset as the Decision Corpus. AOC operates effectively in low-data scenarios, can be extended to the strictly offline imitation setting, and displays qualities of both conservation and adaptability. We assess AOC's performance in both simulated and real-world healthcare scenarios, emphasizing its capability to manage offline control tasks with high levels of performance while maintaining accountability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T17:20:32Z)
• Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systems [76.79703106646967]
  We develop a value-based assessment framework that visualizes closeness and tensions between values. We give guidelines on how to operationalize them, while opening up the evaluation and deliberation process to a wide range of stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-09T19:28:32Z)
• CoCoMoT: Conformance Checking of Multi-Perspective Processes via SMT (Extended Version) [62.96267257163426]
  We introduce the CoCoMoT (Computing Conformance Modulo Theories) framework. First, we show how SAT-based encodings studied in the pure control-flow setting can be lifted to our data-aware case. Second, we introduce a novel preprocessing technique based on a notion of property-preserving clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T20:22:50Z)
• Towards a Formal Framework for Partial Compliance of Business Processes [0.5156484100374059]
  In this paper, we formulate an evaluation framework to quantify the level of compliance of business processes across different levels of abstraction. Our approach can also add social value by making social services provided by local, state and federal governments more flexible and improving the lives of citizens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T12:38:40Z)
• Automated Sustainability Compliance Checking Using Process Mining and Formal Logic [0.0]
  I want to contribute to the application of compliance checking techniques for the purpose of sustainability compliance. I want to analyse and develop data-driven approaches, which allow to automate the task of compliance checking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T11:07:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.