Domain Adaptation for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Limited Samples

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12136v3
• Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 05:21:05 GMT
• Title: Domain Adaptation for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Limited Samples
• Authors: Weiqin Chen, Sandipan Mishra, Santiago Paternain,
• Abstract summary: offline reinforcement learning learns effective policies from a static target dataset.<n>It relies on the quality and size of the target dataset and it degrades if limited samples in the target dataset are available.<n>This paper proposes the first framework that theoretically explores the impact of the weights assigned to each dataset on the performance of offline RL.
• Score: 2.3674123304219816
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning (RL) learns effective policies from a static target dataset. The performance of state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms notwithstanding, it relies on the quality and size of the target dataset and it degrades if limited samples in the target dataset are available, which is often the case in real-world applications. To address this issue, domain adaptation that leverages auxiliary samples from related source datasets (such as simulators) can be beneficial. However, establishing the optimal way to trade off the source and target datasets while ensuring provably theoretical guarantees remains an open challenge. To the best of our knowledge, this paper proposes the first framework that theoretically explores the impact of the weights assigned to each dataset on the performance of offline RL. In particular, we establish performance bounds and the existence of an optimal weight, which can be computed in closed form under simplifying assumptions. We also provide algorithmic guarantees in terms of convergence to a neighborhood of the optimum. Notably, these results depend on the quality of the source dataset and the number of samples from the target dataset. Our empirical results on the well-known Procgen benchmark substantiate our theoretical contributions.

Related papers

• Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs [56.24431208419858]
  We introduce reward-conditioned Large Language Models (LLMs) that learn from the entire spectrum of response quality within the dataset. We propose an effective yet simple data relabeling method that conditions the preference pairs on quality scores to construct a reward-augmented dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T16:01:51Z)
• D5RL: Diverse Datasets for Data-Driven Deep Reinforcement Learning [99.33607114541861]
  We propose a new benchmark for offline RL that focuses on realistic simulations of robotic manipulation and locomotion environments. Our proposed benchmark covers state-based and image-based domains, and supports both offline RL and online fine-tuning evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T22:27:00Z)
• Pessimistic Value Iteration for Multi-Task Data Sharing in Offline Reinforcement Learning [116.87367592920171]
  Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown promising results in learning a task-specific policy from a fixed dataset. In scenarios where the dataset for a specific task is limited, a natural approach is to improve offline RL with datasets from other tasks. We propose an uncertainty-based Multi-Task Data Sharing (MTDS) approach that shares the entire dataset without data selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T08:16:52Z)
• Beyond Uniform Sampling: Offline Reinforcement Learning with Imbalanced Datasets [53.8218145723718]
  offline policy learning is aimed at learning decision-making policies using existing datasets of trajectories without collecting additional data. We argue that when a dataset is dominated by suboptimal trajectories, state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms do not substantially improve over the average return of trajectories in the dataset. We present a realization of the sampling strategy and an algorithm that can be used as a plug-and-play module in standard offline RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T17:58:14Z)
• Offline Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Adaptively Collected Data [28.445166861907495]
  We develop theory for the TMIS Offline Policy Evaluation (OPE) estimator. We derive high-probability, instance-dependent bounds on its estimation error. We also recover minimax-optimal offline learning in the adaptive setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-24T21:48:28Z)
• Harnessing Mixed Offline Reinforcement Learning Datasets via Trajectory Weighting [29.21380944341589]
  We show that state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms are overly restrained by low-return trajectories and fail to exploit trajectories to the fullest. This reweighted sampling strategy may be combined with any offline RL algorithm. We empirically show that while CQL, IQL, and TD3+BC achieve only a part of this potential policy improvement, these same algorithms fully exploit the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T17:58:02Z)
• Offline Reinforcement Learning with Additional Covering Distributions [0.0]
  We study learning optimal policies from a logged dataset, i.e., offline RL, with function approximation. We show that sample-efficient offline RL for general MDPs is possible with only a partial coverage dataset and weak realizable function classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T03:31:03Z)
• Self-training through Classifier Disagreement for Cross-Domain Opinion Target Extraction [62.41511766918932]
  Opinion target extraction (OTE) or aspect extraction (AE) is a fundamental task in opinion mining. Recent work focus on cross-domain OTE, which is typically encountered in real-world scenarios. We propose a new SSL approach that opts for selecting target samples whose model output from a domain-specific teacher and student network disagrees on the unlabelled target data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T16:31:17Z)
• Towards Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning: Lower Bound and Optimality [141.89413461337324]
  Deployment efficiency is an important criterion for many real-world applications of reinforcement learning (RL) We propose a theoretical formulation for deployment-efficient RL (DE-RL) from an "optimization with constraints" perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T01:31:46Z)
• Understanding the Effects of Dataset Characteristics on Offline Reinforcement Learning [4.819336169151637]
  Offline Reinforcement Learning can learn policies from a given dataset without interacting with the environment. We show how dataset characteristics influence the performance of Offline RL algorithms for discrete action environments. For datasets with high TQ, Behavior Cloning outperforms or performs similarly to the best Offline RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-08T18:48:43Z)
• Behavioral Priors and Dynamics Models: Improving Performance and Domain Transfer in Offline RL [82.93243616342275]
  We introduce Offline Model-based RL with Adaptive Behavioral Priors (MABE) MABE is based on the finding that dynamics models, which support within-domain generalization, and behavioral priors, which support cross-domain generalization, are complementary. In experiments that require cross-domain generalization, we find that MABE outperforms prior methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T20:48:49Z)
• Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL? [104.00628430454479]
  We study offline reinforcement learning (RL), which aims to learn an optimal policy based on a dataset collected a priori. We propose a pessimistic variant of the value iteration algorithm (PEVI), which incorporates an uncertainty quantifier as the penalty function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T09:06:57Z)
• D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning [119.49182500071288]
  We introduce benchmarks specifically designed for the offline setting, guided by key properties of datasets relevant to real-world applications of offline RL. By moving beyond simple benchmark tasks and data collected by partially-trained RL agents, we reveal important and unappreciated deficiencies of existing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:18:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.