Trustworthy and Responsible AI for Human-Centric Autonomous Decision-Making Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15550v2
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 07:55:45 GMT
- Title: Trustworthy and Responsible AI for Human-Centric Autonomous Decision-Making Systems
- Authors: Farzaneh Dehghani, Mahsa Dibaji, Fahim Anzum, Lily Dey, Alican Basdemir, Sayeh Bayat, Jean-Christophe Boucher, Steve Drew, Sarah Elaine Eaton, Richard Frayne, Gouri Ginde, Ashley Harris, Yani Ioannou, Catherine Lebel, John Lysack, Leslie Salgado Arzuaga, Emma Stanley, Roberto Souza, Ronnie de Souza Santos, Lana Wells, Tyler Williamson, Matthias Wilms, Zaman Wahid, Mark Ungrin, Marina Gavrilova, Mariana Bento,
- Abstract summary: We review and discuss the intricacies of AI biases, definitions, methods of detection and mitigation, and metrics for evaluating bias.
We also discuss open challenges with regard to the trustworthiness and widespread application of AI across diverse domains of human-centric decision making.
- Score: 2.444630714797783
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has paved the way for revolutionary decision-making processes, which if harnessed appropriately, can contribute to advancements in various sectors, from healthcare to economics. However, its black box nature presents significant ethical challenges related to bias and transparency. AI applications are hugely impacted by biases, presenting inconsistent and unreliable findings, leading to significant costs and consequences, highlighting and perpetuating inequalities and unequal access to resources. Hence, developing safe, reliable, ethical, and Trustworthy AI systems is essential. Our team of researchers working with Trustworthy and Responsible AI, part of the Transdisciplinary Scholarship Initiative within the University of Calgary, conducts research on Trustworthy and Responsible AI, including fairness, bias mitigation, reproducibility, generalization, interpretability, and authenticity. In this paper, we review and discuss the intricacies of AI biases, definitions, methods of detection and mitigation, and metrics for evaluating bias. We also discuss open challenges with regard to the trustworthiness and widespread application of AI across diverse domains of human-centric decision making, as well as guidelines to foster Responsible and Trustworthy AI models.
Related papers
- Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom.
While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems.
We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z) - Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization.
We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Investigating Responsible AI for Scientific Research: An Empirical Study [4.597781832707524]
The push for Responsible AI (RAI) in such institutions underscores the increasing emphasis on integrating ethical considerations within AI design and development.
This paper aims to assess the awareness and preparedness regarding the ethical risks inherent in AI design and development.
Our results have revealed certain knowledge gaps concerning ethical, responsible, and inclusive AI, with limitations in awareness of the available AI ethics frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T06:40:27Z) - A Review of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and its Applications
in the United States [0.0]
The paper highlights the impact AI has in every sector of the US economy and the resultant effect on entities spanning businesses, government, academia, and civil society.
Our discussion explores eleven fundamental 'ethical principles' structured as overarching themes.
These encompass Transparency, Justice, Fairness, Equity, Non- Maleficence, Responsibility, Accountability, Privacy, Beneficence, Freedom, Autonomy, Trust, Dignity, Sustainability, and Solidarity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T14:29:00Z) - It is not "accuracy vs. explainability" -- we need both for trustworthy
AI systems [0.0]
We are witnessing the emergence of an AI economy and society where AI technologies are increasingly impacting health care, business, transportation and many aspects of everyday life.
However, AI systems may produce errors, can exhibit bias, may be sensitive to noise in the data, and often lack technical and judicial transparency resulting in reduction in trust and challenges in their adoption.
These recent shortcomings and concerns have been documented in scientific but also in general press such as accidents with self driving cars, biases in healthcare, hiring and face recognition systems for people of color, seemingly correct medical decisions later found to be made due to wrong reasons etc.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-16T23:33:10Z) - AI Ethics: An Empirical Study on the Views of Practitioners and
Lawmakers [8.82540441326446]
Transparency, accountability, and privacy are the most critical AI ethics principles.
Lack of ethical knowledge, no legal frameworks, and lacking monitoring bodies are the most common AI ethics challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T17:24:29Z) - Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices [44.67324097900778]
Many current AI systems were found vulnerable to imperceptible attacks, biased against underrepresented groups, lacking in user privacy protection, etc.
In this review, we strive to provide AI practitioners a comprehensive guide towards building trustworthy AI systems.
To unify the current fragmented approaches towards trustworthy AI, we propose a systematic approach that considers the entire lifecycle of AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-04T03:20:39Z) - Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being.
For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration
in AI-Assisted Decision Making [53.62514158534574]
We study whether features that reveal case-specific model information can calibrate trust and improve the joint performance of the human and AI.
We show that confidence score can help calibrate people's trust in an AI model, but trust calibration alone is not sufficient to improve AI-assisted decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-07T15:33:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.