Navigating the Future of Education: Educators' Insights on AI Integration and Challenges in Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Ireland and Armenia
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15686v1
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 10:22:05 GMT
- Title: Navigating the Future of Education: Educators' Insights on AI Integration and Challenges in Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Ireland and Armenia
- Authors: Evangelia Daskalaki, Katerina Psaroudaki, Paraskevi Fragopoulou,
- Abstract summary: This paper aims to explore how teachers currently use AI and how it can enhance the educational process.
We conducted a cross-national study spanning Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Ireland, and Armenia, surveying 1754 educators.
- Score: 1.7205106391379026
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Understanding teachers' perspectives on AI in Education (AIEd) is crucial for its effective integration into the educational framework. This paper aims to explore how teachers currently use AI and how it can enhance the educational process. We conducted a cross-national study spanning Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Ireland, and Armenia, surveying 1754 educators through an online questionnaire, addressing three research questions. Our first research question examines educators' understanding of AIEd, their skepticism, and its integration within schools. Most educators report a solid understanding of AI and acknowledge its potential risks. AIEd is primarily used for educator support and engaging students. However, concerns exist about AI's impact on fostering critical thinking and exposing students to biased data. The second research question investigates student engagement with AI tools from educators' perspectives. Teachers indicate that students use AI mainly to manage their academic workload, while outside school, AI tools are primarily used for entertainment. The third research question addresses future implications of AI in education. Educators are optimistic about AI's potential to enhance educational processes, particularly through personalized learning experiences. Nonetheless, they express significant concerns about AI's impact on cultivating critical thinking and ethical issues related to potential misuse. There is a strong emphasis on the need for professional development through training seminars, workshops, and online courses to integrate AI effectively into teaching practices. Overall, the findings highlight a cautious optimism among educators regarding AI in education, alongside a clear demand for targeted professional development to address concerns and enhance skills in using AI tools.
Related papers
- Human-Centric eXplainable AI in Education [0.0]
This paper explores Human-Centric eXplainable AI (HCXAI) in the educational landscape.
It emphasizes its role in enhancing learning outcomes, fostering trust among users, and ensuring transparency in AI-driven tools.
It outlines comprehensive frameworks for developing HCXAI systems that prioritize user understanding and engagement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T14:02:47Z) - Generative AI in Education: A Study of Educators' Awareness, Sentiments, and Influencing Factors [2.217351976766501]
This study delves into university instructors' experiences and attitudes toward AI language models.
We find no correlation between teaching style and attitude toward generative AI.
While CS educators show far more confidence in their technical understanding of generative AI tools, they show no more confidence in their ability to detect AI-generated work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-22T19:21:29Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power.
We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Assigning AI: Seven Approaches for Students, with Prompts [0.0]
This paper examines the transformative role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education and their potential as learning tools.
The authors propose seven approaches for utilizing AI in classrooms: AI-tutor, AI-coach, AI-mentor, AI-teammate, AI-tool, AI-simulator, and AI-student.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-13T03:36:36Z) - New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable
Multifaceted Revolution [2.94944680995069]
ChatGPT's high performance on standardized academic tests has thrust the topic of artificial intelligence (AI) into the mainstream conversation about the future of education.
This research aims to investigate the potential impact of AI on education through review and analysis of the existing literature across three major axes: applications, advantages, and challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-12T08:22:54Z) - The AI Revolution in Education: Will AI Replace or Assist Teachers in
Higher Education? [0.0]
The study provides a comprehensive perspective on the future role of educators in the face of AI technologies.
Participants argue that human teachers possess unique qualities, such as critical thinking, creativity, and emotions, which make them irreplaceable.
The research proposes that teachers can effectively integrate AI to enhance teaching and learning without viewing it as a replacement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-02T03:39:34Z) - An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence
Education in the United Arab Emirates [53.04281982845422]
We present an experience report of teaching an AI course to business executives in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)
Rather than focusing only on theoretical and technical aspects, we developed a course that teaches AI with a view to enabling students to understand how to incorporate it into existing business processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-02T20:59:53Z) - Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations.
It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z) - Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being.
For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Creation and Evaluation of a Pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Curriculum [58.86139968005518]
The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created an AI curriculum for pre-tertiary education.
A team of 14 professors with expertise in engineering and education collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from 6 secondary schools to co-create the curriculum.
The co-creation process generated a variety of resources which enhanced the teachers knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-19T11:26:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.