Persuasion Games using Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15879v2
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 02:30:51 GMT
- Title: Persuasion Games using Large Language Models
- Authors: Ganesh Prasath Ramani, Shirish Karande, Santhosh V, Yash Bhatia,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as formidable instruments capable of comprehending and producing human-like text.
This paper explores the potential of LLMs, to shape user perspectives and subsequently influence their decisions on particular tasks.
This capability finds applications in diverse domains such as Investment, Credit cards and Insurance.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as formidable instruments capable of comprehending and producing human-like text. This paper explores the potential of LLMs, to shape user perspectives and subsequently influence their decisions on particular tasks. This capability finds applications in diverse domains such as Investment, Credit cards and Insurance, wherein they assist users in selecting appropriate insurance policies, investment plans, Credit cards, Retail, as well as in Behavioral Change Support Systems (BCSS). We present a sophisticated multi-agent framework wherein a consortium of agents operate in collaborative manner. The primary agent engages directly with user agents through persuasive dialogue, while the auxiliary agents perform tasks such as information retrieval, response analysis, development of persuasion strategies, and validation of facts. Empirical evidence from our experiments demonstrates that this collaborative methodology significantly enhances the persuasive efficacy of the LLM. We continuously analyze the resistance of the user agent to persuasive efforts and counteract it by employing a combination of rule-based and LLM-based resistance-persuasion mapping techniques. We employ simulated personas and generate conversations in insurance, banking, and retail domains to evaluate the proficiency of large language models (LLMs) in recognizing, adjusting to, and influencing various personality types. Concurrently, we examine the resistance mechanisms employed by LLM simulated personas. Persuasion is quantified via measurable surveys before and after interaction, LLM-generated scores on conversation, and user decisions (purchase or non-purchase).
Related papers
- Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication.
In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness.
Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z) - RAG-Modulo: Solving Sequential Tasks using Experience, Critics, and Language Models [5.0741409008225755]
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for solving challenging robotic tasks.
Most existing LLM-based agents lack the ability to retain and learn from past interactions.
We propose RAG-Modulo, a framework that enhances LLM-based agents with a memory of past interactions and incorporates critics to evaluate the agents' decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T20:03:32Z) - PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development.
We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z) - Persona Inconstancy in Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration: Conformity, Confabulation, and Impersonation [16.82101507069166]
Multi-agent AI systems can be used for simulating collective decision-making in scientific and practical applications.
We examine AI agent ensembles engaged in cross-national collaboration and debate by analyzing their private responses and chat transcripts.
Our findings suggest that multi-agent discussions can support collective AI decisions that more often reflect diverse perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-06T21:20:35Z) - Evaluating Interventional Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models [58.52919374786108]
Large language models (LLMs) can estimate causal effects under interventions on different parts of a system.
We conduct empirical analyses to evaluate whether LLMs can accurately update their knowledge of a data-generating process in response to an intervention.
We create benchmarks that span diverse causal graphs (e.g., confounding, mediation) and variable types, and enable a study of intervention-based reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-08T14:15:56Z) - Elicitron: An LLM Agent-Based Simulation Framework for Design Requirements Elicitation [38.98478510165569]
This paper introduces a novel framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate and enhance the requirements elicitation process.
LLMs are used to generate a vast array of simulated users (LLM agents), enabling the exploration of a much broader range of user needs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T17:36:29Z) - Transforming Competition into Collaboration: The Revolutionary Role of Multi-Agent Systems and Language Models in Modern Organizations [0.0]
This article explores the influence of computational entities based on multi-agent systems theory (SMA) and large language models (LLM) on human user interaction.
In our approach we employ agents developed from large language models (LLM), each with distinct prototyping that considers behavioral elements.
We demonstrate the potential of developing agents useful for organizational strategies, based on multi-agent system theories (SMA) and innovative uses based on large language models (LLM based)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T15:56:10Z) - Large Multimodal Agents: A Survey [78.81459893884737]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved superior performance in powering text-based AI agents.
There is an emerging research trend focused on extending these LLM-powered AI agents into the multimodal domain.
This review aims to provide valuable insights and guidelines for future research in this rapidly evolving field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-23T06:04:23Z) - MAgIC: Investigation of Large Language Model Powered Multi-Agent in
Cognition, Adaptability, Rationality and Collaboration [102.41118020705876]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have marked a significant advancement in the field of natural language processing.
As their applications extend into multi-agent environments, a need has arisen for a comprehensive evaluation framework.
This work introduces a novel benchmarking framework specifically tailored to assess LLMs within multi-agent settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T21:46:27Z) - ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate [57.71597869337909]
We build a multi-agent referee team called ChatEval to autonomously discuss and evaluate the quality of generated responses from different models.
Our analysis shows that ChatEval transcends mere textual scoring, offering a human-mimicking evaluation process for reliable assessments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-14T15:13:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.