Random Erasing vs. Model Inversion: A Promising Defense or a False Hope?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01062v3
• Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 05:41:14 GMT
• Title: Random Erasing vs. Model Inversion: A Promising Defense or a False Hope?
• Abstract summary: Model Inversion (MI) attacks pose a significant privacy threat by reconstructing private training data from machine learning models.<n>We explore Random Erasing (RE) to uncover its surprising effectiveness as a defense against MI attacks.<n>Our findings highlight RE as a simple yet effective defense mechanism that can be easily integrated with existing privacy-preserving techniques.
• Score: 25.265902142904373
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Model Inversion (MI) attacks pose a significant privacy threat by reconstructing private training data from machine learning models. While existing defenses primarily concentrate on model-centric approaches, the impact of data on MI robustness remains largely unexplored. In this work, we explore Random Erasing (RE), a technique traditionally used for improving model generalization under occlusion, and uncover its surprising effectiveness as a defense against MI attacks. Specifically, our novel feature space analysis shows that models trained with RE-images introduce a significant discrepancy between the features of MI-reconstructed images and those of the private data. At the same time, features of private images remain distinct from other classes and well-separated from different classification regions. These effects collectively degrade MI reconstruction quality and attack accuracy while maintaining reasonable natural accuracy. Furthermore, we explore two critical properties of RE including Partial Erasure and Random Location. Partial Erasure prevents the model from observing entire objects during training. We find this has a significant impact on MI, which aims to reconstruct the entire objects. Random Location of erasure plays a crucial role in achieving a strong privacy-utility trade-off. Our findings highlight RE as a simple yet effective defense mechanism that can be easily integrated with existing privacy-preserving techniques. Extensive experiments across 37 setups demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in the privacy-utility trade-off. The results consistently demonstrate the superiority of our defense over existing methods across different MI attacks, network architectures, and attack configurations. For the first time, we achieve a significant degradation in attack accuracy without a decrease in utility for some configurations.

Related papers

• Reducing information dependency does not cause training data privacy. Adversarially non-robust features do [1.9754011041953694]
  We show that extensive exposure can persist without rote memorization and is instead caused by a tunable connection to adversarial robustness.<n>Our results revise the prevailing understanding of training data exposure and reveal a new privacy-robustness tradeoff.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T05:06:24Z)
• Debiased Dual-Invariant Defense for Adversarially Robust Person Re-Identification [52.63017280231648]
  Person re-identification (ReID) is a fundamental task in many real-world applications such as pedestrian trajectory tracking.<n>Person ReID models are highly susceptible to adversarial attacks, where imperceptible perturbations to pedestrian images can cause entirely incorrect predictions.<n>We propose a dual-invariant defense framework composed of two main phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T03:56:40Z)
• MISLEADER: Defending against Model Extraction with Ensembles of Distilled Models [56.09354775405601]
  Model extraction attacks aim to replicate the functionality of a black-box model through query access.<n>Most existing defenses presume that attacker queries have out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, enabling them to detect and disrupt suspicious inputs.<n>We propose MISLEADER, a novel defense strategy that does not rely on OOD assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T01:37:09Z)
• A Sample-Level Evaluation and Generative Framework for Model Inversion Attacks [26.585927770608105]
  Model Inversion (MI) attacks pose significant privacy concerns in machine learning.<n>Recent MI attacks have managed to reconstruct realistic label-level private data.<n>We show sample-level privacy, the private information of a single target sample, is also important but under-explored in the MI literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T11:50:43Z)
• CALoR: Towards Comprehensive Model Inversion Defense [43.2642796582236]
  Model Inversion Attacks (MIAs) aim at recovering privacy-sensitive training data from the knowledge encoded in released machine learning models. Recent advances in the MIA field have significantly enhanced the attack performance under multiple scenarios. We propose a robust defense mechanism, integrating Confidence Adaptation and Low-Rank compression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T08:44:01Z)
• Model Inversion Robustness: Can Transfer Learning Help? [27.883074562565877]
  Model Inversion (MI) attacks aim to reconstruct private training data by abusing access to machine learning models. We propose Transfer Learning-based Defense against Model Inversion (TL-DMI) to render MI-robust models. Our method achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) MI robustness without bells and whistles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T07:24:28Z)
• MIST: Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks Through Membership-Invariant Subspace Training [20.303439793769854]
  Member Inference (MI) attacks are a major privacy concern when using private data to train machine learning (ML) models. We introduce a novel Membership-Invariant Subspace Training (MIST) method to defend against MI attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T01:25:49Z)
• Accurate, Explainable, and Private Models: Providing Recourse While Minimizing Training Data Leakage [10.921553888358375]
  We present two novel methods to generate differentially private recourse. We find that DPM and LR perform well in reducing what an adversary can infer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T15:38:55Z)
• Isolation and Induction: Training Robust Deep Neural Networks against Model Stealing Attacks [51.51023951695014]
  Existing model stealing defenses add deceptive perturbations to the victim's posterior probabilities to mislead the attackers. This paper proposes Isolation and Induction (InI), a novel and effective training framework for model stealing defenses. In contrast to adding perturbations over model predictions that harm the benign accuracy, we train models to produce uninformative outputs against stealing queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T05:54:01Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• Re-thinking Model Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networks [34.87141698143304]
  Model inversion (MI) attacks aim to infer and reconstruct private training data by abusing access to a model. Recent algorithms for MI have been proposed to improve the attack performance. We study two fundamental issues pertaining to all state-of-the-art (SOTA) MI algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T09:58:07Z)
• Data Forensics in Diffusion Models: A Systematic Analysis of Membership Privacy [62.16582309504159]
  We develop a systematic analysis of membership inference attacks on diffusion models and propose novel attack methods tailored to each attack scenario. Our approach exploits easily obtainable quantities and is highly effective, achieving near-perfect attack performance (>0.9 AUCROC) in realistic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T17:37:49Z)
• CANIFE: Crafting Canaries for Empirical Privacy Measurement in Federated Learning [77.27443885999404]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a setting for training machine learning models in distributed environments. We propose a novel method, CANIFE, that uses carefully crafted samples by a strong adversary to evaluate the empirical privacy of a training round.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T13:30:16Z)
• RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing Utility [68.48117818874155]
  We propose a novel training framework based on a relaxed loss with a more achievable learning target. RelaxLoss is applicable to any classification model with added benefits of easy implementation and negligible overhead. Our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art defense mechanisms in terms of resilience against MIAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T19:34:47Z)
• Defending against Reconstruction Attacks with R\'enyi Differential Privacy [72.1188520352079]
  Reconstruction attacks allow an adversary to regenerate data samples of the training set using access to only a trained model. Differential privacy is a known solution to such attacks, but is often used with a relatively large privacy budget. We show that, for a same mechanism, we can derive privacy guarantees for reconstruction attacks that are better than the traditional ones from the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T18:09:30Z)
• Knowledge-Enriched Distributional Model Inversion Attacks [49.43828150561947]
  Model inversion (MI) attacks are aimed at reconstructing training data from model parameters. We present a novel inversion-specific GAN that can better distill knowledge useful for performing attacks on private models from public data. Our experiments show that the combination of these techniques can significantly boost the success rate of the state-of-the-art MI attacks by 150%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T16:20:48Z)
• Improving Robustness to Model Inversion Attacks via Mutual Information Regularization [12.079281416410227]
  This paper studies defense mechanisms against model inversion (MI) attacks. MI is a type of privacy attacks aimed at inferring information about the training data distribution given the access to a target machine learning model. We propose the Mutual Information Regularization based Defense (MID) against MI attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-11T06:02:44Z)
• How Does Data Augmentation Affect Privacy in Machine Learning? [94.52721115660626]
  We propose new MI attacks to utilize the information of augmented data. We establish the optimal membership inference when the model is trained with augmented data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T02:21:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.