Initial Development and Evaluation of the Creative Artificial Intelligence through Recurring Developments and Determinations (CAIRDD) System

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02291v1
• Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 21:04:07 GMT
• Title: Initial Development and Evaluation of the Creative Artificial Intelligence through Recurring Developments and Determinations (CAIRDD) System
• Authors: Jeremy Straub, Zach Johnson,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) provide a facsimile of creativity and the appearance of sentience, while not actually being either creative or sentient. This paper proposes a technique for enhancing LLM output creativity via an iterative process of concept injection and refinement.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Computer system creativity is a key step on the pathway to artificial general intelligence (AGI). It is elusive, however, due to the fact that human creativity is not fully understood and, thus, it is difficult to develop this capability in software. Large language models (LLMs) provide a facsimile of creativity and the appearance of sentience, while not actually being either creative or sentient. While LLMs have created bona fide new content, in some cases - such as with harmful hallucinations - inadvertently, their deliberate creativity is seen by some to not match that of humans. In response to this challenge, this paper proposes a technique for enhancing LLM output creativity via an iterative process of concept injection and refinement. Initial work on the development of the Creative Artificial Intelligence through Recurring Developments and Determinations (CAIRDD) system is presented and the efficacy of key system components is evaluated.

Related papers

• A Causality-aware Paradigm for Evaluating Creativity of Multimodal Large Language Models [100.16387798660833]
  Oogiri game is a creativity-driven task requiring humor and associative thinking. LoTbench is an interactive, causality-aware evaluation framework. Results show that while most LLMs exhibit constrained creativity, the performance gap between LLMs and humans is not insurmountable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T09:11:15Z)
• Artificial intelligence and the internal processes of creativity [1.3597551064547502]
  This paper explores the neurobiological machinery that underlies the internal processes of creativity. It is concluded that although the products of artificial and human creativity can be similar, the internal processes are different. The paper also discusses how AI may negatively affect the internal processes of human creativity, such as the development of skills, the integration of knowledge, and the diversity of ideas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T17:33:12Z)
• The Dynamic Creativity of Proto-artifacts in Generative Computational Co-creation [0.22940141855172028]
  This paper explores the attributes necessary to determine the creative merit of intermediate artifacts produced during a computational co-creative process. In an active listening experiment, subjects with diverse musical training judged unfinished pieces composed by the New Electronic Assistant (NEA) The results revealed that a two-attribute definition based on the value and novelty of an artifact suffices to assess unfinished work leading to innovative products.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T20:44:33Z)
• Creativity in AI: Progresses and Challenges [17.03526787878041]
  We study the creative capabilities of AI systems, focusing on creative problem-solving, linguistic, artistic, and scientific creativity. Our review suggests that while the latest AI models are largely capable of producing linguistically and artistically creative outputs, they struggle with tasks that require creative problem-solving. We highlight the need for a comprehensive evaluation of creativity that is process-driven and considers several dimensions of creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T17:43:39Z)
• Automating Creativity [1.0200170217746136]
  This paper explores what is required to evolve AI from generative to creative. We develop a triple prompt-response-reward engineering framework to develop the creative capability of GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-11T05:05:10Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• A Neuro-mimetic Realization of the Common Model of Cognition via Hebbian Learning and Free Energy Minimization [55.11642177631929]
  Large neural generative models are capable of synthesizing semantically rich passages of text or producing complex images. We discuss the COGnitive Neural GENerative system, such an architecture that casts the Common Model of Cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T23:28:48Z)
• Designing Participatory AI: Creative Professionals' Worries and Expectations about Generative AI [8.379286663107845]
  Generative AI, i.e., the group of technologies that automatically generate visual or written content based on text prompts, has undergone a leap in complexity and become widely available within just a few years. This paper presents the results of a qualitative survey investigating how creative professionals think about generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T20:57:03Z)
• Towards Creativity Characterization of Generative Models via Group-based Subset Scanning [64.6217849133164]
  We propose group-based subset scanning to identify, quantify, and characterize creative processes. We find that creative samples generate larger subsets of anomalies than normal or non-creative samples across datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-01T15:07:14Z)
• Towards creativity characterization of generative models via group-based subset scanning [51.84144826134919]
  We propose group-based subset scanning to quantify, detect, and characterize creative processes. Creative samples generate larger subsets of anomalies than normal or non-creative samples across datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-01T14:07:49Z)
• Explaining Creative Artifacts [69.86890599471202]
  We develop an inverse problem formulation to deconstruct the products of and compositional creativity into associative chains. In particular, our formulation is structured as solving a traveling salesman problem through a knowledge graph of associative elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T14:32:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.