ForeCal: Random Forest-based Calibration for DNNs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02446v1
• Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 04:56:41 GMT
• Title: ForeCal: Random Forest-based Calibration for DNNs
• Authors: Dhruv Nigam,
• Abstract summary: We propose ForeCal, a novel post-hoc calibration algorithm based on Random forests. ForeCal exploits two unique properties of Random forests: the ability to enforce weak monotonicity and range-preservation. We show that ForeCal outperforms existing methods in terms of Expected Error(ECE) with minimal impact on the discriminative power of the base as measured by AUC.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep neural network(DNN) based classifiers do extremely well in discriminating between observations, resulting in higher ROC AUC and accuracy metrics, but their outputs are often miscalibrated with respect to true event likelihoods. Post-hoc calibration algorithms are often used to calibrate the outputs of these classifiers. Methods like Isotonic regression, Platt scaling, and Temperature scaling have been shown to be effective in some cases but are limited by their parametric assumptions and/or their inability to capture complex non-linear relationships. We propose ForeCal - a novel post-hoc calibration algorithm based on Random forests. ForeCal exploits two unique properties of Random forests: the ability to enforce weak monotonicity and range-preservation. It is more powerful in achieving calibration than current state-of-the-art methods, is non-parametric, and can incorporate exogenous information as features to learn a better calibration function. Through experiments on 43 diverse datasets from the UCI ML repository, we show that ForeCal outperforms existing methods in terms of Expected Calibration Error(ECE) with minimal impact on the discriminative power of the base DNN as measured by AUC.

Related papers

• Calibrating Deep Neural Network using Euclidean Distance [5.675312975435121]
  In machine learning, Focal Loss is commonly used to reduce misclassification rates by emphasizing hard-to-classify samples. High calibration error indicates a misalignment between predicted probabilities and actual outcomes, affecting model reliability. This research introduces a novel loss function called Focal Loss (FCL), designed to improve probability calibration while retaining the advantages of Focal Loss in handling difficult samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T23:06:50Z)
• Calibration by Distribution Matching: Trainable Kernel Calibration Metrics [56.629245030893685]
  We introduce kernel-based calibration metrics that unify and generalize popular forms of calibration for both classification and regression. These metrics admit differentiable sample estimates, making it easy to incorporate a calibration objective into empirical risk minimization. We provide intuitive mechanisms to tailor calibration metrics to a decision task, and enforce accurate loss estimation and no regret decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T06:19:40Z)
• Bridging Precision and Confidence: A Train-Time Loss for Calibrating Object Detection [58.789823426981044]
  We propose a novel auxiliary loss formulation that aims to align the class confidence of bounding boxes with the accurateness of predictions. Our results reveal that our train-time loss surpasses strong calibration baselines in reducing calibration error for both in and out-domain scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T08:56:21Z)
• A Consistent and Differentiable Lp Canonical Calibration Error Estimator [21.67616079217758]
  Deep neural networks are poorly calibrated and tend to output overconfident predictions. We propose a low-bias, trainable calibration error estimator based on Dirichlet kernel density estimates. Our method has a natural choice of kernel, and can be used to generate consistent estimates of other quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T15:11:11Z)
• T-Cal: An optimal test for the calibration of predictive models [49.11538724574202]
  We consider detecting mis-calibration of predictive models using a finite validation dataset as a hypothesis testing problem. detecting mis-calibration is only possible when the conditional probabilities of the classes are sufficiently smooth functions of the predictions. We propose T-Cal, a minimax test for calibration based on a de-biased plug-in estimator of the $ell$-Expected Error (ECE)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T16:58:54Z)
• Taking a Step Back with KCal: Multi-Class Kernel-Based Calibration for Deep Neural Networks [40.282423098764404]
  This paper proposes a new Kernel-based calibration method called KCal. Unlike other calibration procedures, KCal does not operate directly on the logits or softmax outputs of the DNN. In effect, KCal amounts to a supervised dimensionality reduction of the neural network embedding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T19:04:05Z)
• Meta-Cal: Well-controlled Post-hoc Calibration by Ranking [23.253020991581963]
  Post-hoc calibration is a technique to recalibrate a model, and its goal is to learn a calibration map. Existing approaches mostly focus on constructing calibration maps with low calibration errors. We study post-hoc calibration for multi-class classification under constraints, as a calibrator with a low calibration error does not necessarily mean it is useful in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T12:00:54Z)
• Parameterized Temperature Scaling for Boosting the Expressive Power in Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration [57.568461777747515]
  We introduce a novel calibration method, Parametrized Temperature Scaling (PTS) We demonstrate that the performance of accuracy-preserving state-of-the-art post-hoc calibrators is limited by their intrinsic expressive power. We show with extensive experiments that our novel accuracy-preserving approach consistently outperforms existing algorithms across a large number of model architectures, datasets and metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T10:18:30Z)
• Localized Calibration: Metrics and Recalibration [133.07044916594361]
  We propose a fine-grained calibration metric that spans the gap between fully global and fully individualized calibration. We then introduce a localized recalibration method, LoRe, that improves the LCE better than existing recalibration methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:22:12Z)
• Calibration of Neural Networks using Splines [51.42640515410253]
  Measuring calibration error amounts to comparing two empirical distributions. We introduce a binning-free calibration measure inspired by the classical Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) statistical test. Our method consistently outperforms existing methods on KS error as well as other commonly used calibration measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T07:18:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.