Can Your Generative Model Detect Out-of-Distribution Covariate Shift?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03043v2
• Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 15:44:35 GMT
• Title: Can Your Generative Model Detect Out-of-Distribution Covariate Shift?
• Authors: Christiaan Viviers, Amaan Valiuddin, Francisco Caetano, Lemar Abdi, Lena Filatova, Peter de With, Fons van der Sommen,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel method for detecting Out-of-Distribution (OOD) sensory data using conditional Normalizing Flows (cNFs) Our results on CIFAR10 vs. CIFAR10-C and ImageNet200 vs. ImageNet200-C demonstrate the effectiveness of the method.
• Score: 2.0144831048903566
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Detecting Out-of-Distribution (OOD) sensory data and covariate distribution shift aims to identify new test examples with different high-level image statistics to the captured, normal and In-Distribution (ID) set. Existing OOD detection literature largely focuses on semantic shift with little-to-no consensus over covariate shift. Generative models capture the ID data in an unsupervised manner, enabling them to effectively identify samples that deviate significantly from this learned distribution, irrespective of the downstream task. In this work, we elucidate the ability of generative models to detect and quantify domain-specific covariate shift through extensive analyses that involves a variety of models. To this end, we conjecture that it is sufficient to detect most occurring sensory faults (anomalies and deviations in global signals statistics) by solely modeling high-frequency signal-dependent and independent details. We propose a novel method, CovariateFlow, for OOD detection, specifically tailored to covariate heteroscedastic high-frequency image-components using conditional Normalizing Flows (cNFs). Our results on CIFAR10 vs. CIFAR10-C and ImageNet200 vs. ImageNet200-C demonstrate the effectiveness of the method by accurately detecting OOD covariate shift. This work contributes to enhancing the fidelity of imaging systems and aiding machine learning models in OOD detection in the presence of covariate shift.

Related papers

• Going Beyond Conventional OOD Detection [0.0]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is critical to ensure the safe deployment of deep learning models in critical applications. We present a unified Approach to Spurimatious, fine-grained, and Conventional OOD Detection (ASCOOD) Our approach effectively mitigates the impact of spurious correlations and encourages capturing fine-grained attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-16T13:04:52Z)
• Perturb-and-Compare Approach for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples in Constrained Access Environments [20.554546406575]
  We propose an OOD detection framework, MixDiff, that is applicable even when the model's parameters or its activations are not accessible to the end user. We provide theoretical analysis to illustrate MixDiff's effectiveness in discerning OOD samples that induce overconfident outputs from the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T15:51:31Z)
• Exploiting Diffusion Prior for Out-of-Distribution Detection [11.11093497717038]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is crucial for deploying robust machine learning models. We present a novel approach for OOD detection that leverages the generative ability of diffusion models and the powerful feature extraction capabilities of CLIP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T23:55:25Z)
• Out-of-Distribution Detection with a Single Unconditional Diffusion Model [54.15132801131365]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is a critical task in machine learning that seeks to identify abnormal samples. Traditionally, unsupervised methods utilize a deep generative model for OOD detection. This paper explores whether a single model can perform OOD detection across diverse tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T08:54:03Z)
• DiffGuard: Semantic Mismatch-Guided Out-of-Distribution Detection using Pre-trained Diffusion Models [25.58447344260747]
  We use pre-trained diffusion models for semantic mismatch-guided OOD detection, named DiffGuard. Experiments show that DiffGuard is effective on both Cifar-10 and hard cases of the large-scale ImageNet. It can be easily combined with existing OOD detection techniques to achieve state-of-the-art OOD detection results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T10:37:04Z)
• Masked Images Are Counterfactual Samples for Robust Fine-tuning [77.82348472169335]
  Fine-tuning deep learning models can lead to a trade-off between in-distribution (ID) performance and out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness. We propose a novel fine-tuning method, which uses masked images as counterfactual samples that help improve the robustness of the fine-tuning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T11:51:28Z)
• Energy-based Out-of-Distribution Detection for Graph Neural Networks [76.0242218180483]
  We propose a simple, powerful and efficient OOD detection model for GNN-based learning on graphs, which we call GNNSafe. GNNSafe achieves up to $17.0%$ AUROC improvement over state-of-the-arts and it could serve as simple yet strong baselines in such an under-developed area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T16:38:43Z)
• Exploring Covariate and Concept Shift for Detection and Calibration of Out-of-Distribution Data [77.27338842609153]
  characterization reveals that sensitivity to each type of shift is important to the detection and confidence calibration of OOD data. We propose a geometrically-inspired method to improve OOD detection under both shifts with only in-distribution data. We are the first to propose a method that works well across both OOD detection and calibration and under different types of shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-28T15:42:55Z)
• Learn what you can't learn: Regularized Ensembles for Transductive Out-of-distribution Detection [76.39067237772286]
  We show that current out-of-distribution (OOD) detection algorithms for neural networks produce unsatisfactory results in a variety of OOD detection scenarios. This paper studies how such "hard" OOD scenarios can benefit from adjusting the detection method after observing a batch of the test data. We propose a novel method that uses an artificial labeling scheme for the test data and regularization to obtain ensembles of models that produce contradictory predictions only on the OOD samples in a test batch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T16:55:13Z)
• Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Data [51.552870594221865]
  Normalizing flows fail to distinguish between in- and out-of-distribution data. We demonstrate that flows learn local pixel correlations and generic image-to-latent-space transformations. We show that by modifying the architecture of flow coupling layers we can bias the flow towards learning the semantic structure of the target data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T17:00:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.