Multi-language Unit Test Generation using LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03093v1
• Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 21:46:18 GMT
• Title: Multi-language Unit Test Generation using LLMs
• Authors: Rangeet Pan, Myeongsoo Kim, Rahul Krishna, Raju Pavuluri, Saurabh Sinha,
• Abstract summary: We describe a generic pipeline that incorporates static analysis to guide LLMs in generating compilable and high-coverage test cases. We show how the pipeline can be applied to different programming languages, specifically Java and Python, and to complex software requiring environment mocking. Our results demonstrate that LLM-based test generation, when guided by static analysis, can be competitive with, and even outperform, state-of-the-art test-generation techniques in coverage achieved.
• Score: 6.259245181881262
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Implementing automated unit tests is an important but time consuming activity in software development. Developers dedicate substantial time to writing tests for validating an application and preventing regressions. To support developers in this task, software engineering research over the past few decades has developed many techniques for automating unit test generation. However, despite this effort, usable tools exist for very few programming languages -- mainly Java, C, and C# and, more recently, for Python. Moreover, studies have found that automatically generated tests suffer poor readability and often do not resemble developer-written tests. In this work, we present a rigorous investigation of how large language models (LLMs) can help bridge the gap. We describe a generic pipeline that incorporates static analysis to guide LLMs in generating compilable and high-coverage test cases. We illustrate how the pipeline can be applied to different programming languages, specifically Java and Python, and to complex software requiring environment mocking. We conducted a through empirical study to assess the quality of the generated tests in terms of coverage, mutation score, and test naturalness -- evaluating them on standard as well as enterprise Java applications and a large Python benchmark. Our results demonstrate that LLM-based test generation, when guided by static analysis, can be competitive with, and even outperform, state-of-the-art test-generation techniques in coverage achieved while also producing considerably more natural test cases that developers find easy to read and understand. We also present the results of a user study, conducted with 161 professional developers, that highlights the naturalness characteristics of the tests generated by our approach.

Related papers

• Do LLMs generate test oracles that capture the actual or the expected program behaviour? [7.772338538073763]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained on an enormous amount of data to generate developer-like code and test cases. This study includes developer-written and automatically generated test cases and oracles for 24 open-source Java repositories. LLMs are better at generating test oracles rather than classifying the correct ones, and can generate better test oracles when the code contains meaningful test or variable names.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T15:37:06Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhancing the Understandability of Generated Unit Tests [4.574205608859157]
  We introduce UTGen, which combines search-based software testing and large language models to enhance the understandability of automatically generated test cases. We observe that participants working on assignments with UTGen test cases fix up to 33% more bugs and use up to 20% less time when compared to baseline test cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T15:35:34Z)
• A System for Automated Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models and Assessment of Generated Test Suites [1.4563527353943984]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to various aspects of software development. We present AgoneTest: an automated system for generating test suites for Java projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T23:02:16Z)
• Harnessing the Power of LLMs: Automating Unit Test Generation for High-Performance Computing [7.3166218350585135]
  Unit testing is crucial in software engineering for ensuring quality. It's not widely used in parallel and high-performance computing software, particularly scientific applications. We propose an automated method for generating unit tests for such software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T22:45:55Z)
• Automatic benchmarking of large multimodal models via iterative experiment programming [71.78089106671581]
  We present APEx, the first framework for automatic benchmarking of LMMs. Given a research question expressed in natural language, APEx leverages a large language model (LLM) and a library of pre-specified tools to generate a set of experiments for the model at hand. The report drives the testing procedure: based on the current status of the investigation, APEx chooses which experiments to perform and whether the results are sufficient to draw conclusions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T06:43:46Z)
• TESTEVAL: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Test Case Generation [15.343859279282848]
  We propose TESTEVAL, a novel benchmark for test case generation with large language models (LLMs) We collect 210 Python programs from an online programming platform, LeetCode, and design three different tasks: overall coverage, targeted line/branch coverage, and targeted path coverage. We find that generating test cases to cover specific program lines/branches/paths is still challenging for current LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T22:07:50Z)
• DevBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Software Development [72.24266814625685]
  DevBench is a benchmark that evaluates large language models (LLMs) across various stages of the software development lifecycle. Empirical studies show that current LLMs, including GPT-4-Turbo, fail to solve the challenges presented within DevBench. Our findings offer actionable insights for the future development of LLMs toward real-world programming applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T15:13:44Z)
• Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment [84.09815387884753]
  We propose a generative judge with 13B parameters, Auto-J, designed to address these challenges. Our model is trained on user queries and LLM-generated responses under massive real-world scenarios. Experimentally, Auto-J outperforms a series of strong competitors, including both open-source and closed-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T07:27:15Z)
• LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Execution [64.36459105535]
  We propose LEVER, a simple approach to improve language-to-code generation by learning to verify the generated programs with their execution results. Specifically, we train verifiers to determine whether a program sampled from the LLMs is correct or not based on the natural language input, the program itself and its execution results. LEVER consistently improves over the base code LLMs(4.6% to 10.9% with code-davinci) and achieves new state-of-the-art results on all of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T18:23:22Z)
• Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS [54.22600767666257]
  We introduce APPS, a benchmark for code generation. Our benchmark includes 10,000 problems, which range from having simple one-line solutions to being substantial algorithmic challenges. Recent models such as GPT-Neo can pass approximately 15% of the test cases of introductory problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T17:58:42Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList [66.42971817954806]
  CheckList is a task-agnostic methodology for testing NLP models. CheckList includes a matrix of general linguistic capabilities and test types that facilitate comprehensive test ideation. In a user study, NLP practitioners with CheckList created twice as many tests, and found almost three times as many bugs as users without it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-08T15:48:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.