Towards Safer Online Spaces: Simulating and Assessing Intervention Strategies for Eating Disorder Discussions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04043v1
• Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 06:27:35 GMT
• Title: Towards Safer Online Spaces: Simulating and Assessing Intervention Strategies for Eating Disorder Discussions
• Authors: Louis Penafiel, Hsien-Te Kao, Isabel Erickson, David Chu, Robert McCormack, Kristina Lerman, Svitlana Volkova,
• Abstract summary: We present a novel experimental testbed for simulating and assessing intervention strategies in ED-related discussions. Our framework generates synthetic conversations across multiple platforms, models, and ED-related topics. We analyze the impact of various intervention strategies on conversation dynamics across four dimensions.
• Score: 2.752488721131003
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Eating disorders are complex mental health conditions that affect millions of people around the world. Effective interventions on social media platforms are crucial, yet testing strategies in situ can be risky. We present a novel LLM-driven experimental testbed for simulating and assessing intervention strategies in ED-related discussions. Our framework generates synthetic conversations across multiple platforms, models, and ED-related topics, allowing for controlled experimentation with diverse intervention approaches. We analyze the impact of various intervention strategies on conversation dynamics across four dimensions: intervention type, generative model, social media platform, and ED-related community/topic. We employ cognitive domain analysis metrics, including sentiment, emotions, etc., to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. Our findings reveal that civility-focused interventions consistently improve positive sentiment and emotional tone across all dimensions, while insight-resetting approaches tend to increase negative emotions. We also uncover significant biases in LLM-generated conversations, with cognitive metrics varying notably between models (Claude-3 Haiku $>$ Mistral $>$ GPT-3.5-turbo $>$ LLaMA3) and even between versions of the same model. These variations highlight the importance of model selection in simulating realistic discussions related to ED. Our work provides valuable information on the complex dynamics of ED-related discussions and the effectiveness of various intervention strategies.

Related papers

• Decoding Echo Chambers: LLM-Powered Simulations Revealing Polarization in Social Networks [12.812531689189065]
  Impact of social media on critical issues such as echo chambers needs to be addressed. Traditional research often oversimplifies emotional tendencies and opinion evolution into numbers and formulas. We propose an LLM-based simulation for the social opinion network to evaluate and counter polarization phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T12:49:02Z)
• Are Large Language Models Possible to Conduct Cognitive Behavioral Therapy? [13.0263170692984]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been validated, providing new possibilities for psychological assistance therapy. Many concerns have been raised by mental health experts regarding the use of LLMs for therapy. Four LLM variants with excellent performance on natural language processing are evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T03:01:47Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Causal Inference for Human-Language Model Collaboration [24.096991077437146]
  We develop CausalCollab, an algorithm designed to estimate the ISE of various interaction strategies in dynamic human-LM collaborations. Our empirical investigations across three distinct human-LM collaboration scenarios reveal that CausalCollab effectively reduces confounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-30T01:08:25Z)
• AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven Agents [65.16893197330589]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to replicate human behaviors across a wide range of scenarios. However, their capability in handling complex, multi-character social interactions has yet to be fully explored. We introduce the Multi-Agent Interaction Evaluation Framework (AntEval), encompassing a novel interaction framework and evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T11:18:00Z)
• Building Emotional Support Chatbots in the Era of LLMs [64.06811786616471]
  We introduce an innovative methodology that synthesizes human insights with the computational prowess of Large Language Models (LLMs) By utilizing the in-context learning potential of ChatGPT, we generate an ExTensible Emotional Support dialogue dataset, named ExTES. Following this, we deploy advanced tuning techniques on the LLaMA model, examining the impact of diverse training strategies, ultimately yielding an LLM meticulously optimized for emotional support interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T10:49:18Z)
• Re-mine, Learn and Reason: Exploring the Cross-modal Semantic Correlations for Language-guided HOI detection [57.13665112065285]
  Human-Object Interaction (HOI) detection is a challenging computer vision task. We present a framework that enhances HOI detection by incorporating structured text knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T14:20:52Z)
• Expanding the Role of Affective Phenomena in Multimodal Interaction Research [57.069159905961214]
  We examined over 16,000 papers from selected conferences in multimodal interaction, affective computing, and natural language processing. We identify 910 affect-related papers and present our analysis of the role of affective phenomena in these papers. We find limited research on how affect and emotion predictions might be used by AI systems to enhance machine understanding of human social behaviors and cognitive states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T09:08:39Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.