Seek and Solve Reasoning for Table Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05286v2
• Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 09:57:52 GMT
• Title: Seek and Solve Reasoning for Table Question Answering
• Authors: Ruya Jiang, Chun Wang, Weihong Deng,
• Abstract summary: This paper reveals that the reasoning process during task simplification may be more valuable than the simplified tasks themselves. We propose a Seek-and-solving pipeline that instructs the LLM to first seek relevant information and then answer questions. We distill a single-step TQA-solving prompt from this pipeline, using demonstrations with SS-CoT paths to guide the LLM in solving complex TQA tasks.
• Score: 49.006950918895306
• License:
• Abstract: The complexities of table structures and question logic make table-based question answering (TQA) tasks challenging for Large Language Models (LLMs), often requiring task simplification before solving. This paper reveals that the reasoning process during task simplification may be more valuable than the simplified tasks themselves and aims to improve TQA performance by leveraging LLMs' reasoning capabilities. We propose a Seek-and-Solve pipeline that instructs the LLM to first seek relevant information and then answer questions, integrating these two stages at the reasoning level into a coherent Seek-and-Solve Chain of Thought (SS-CoT). Additionally, we distill a single-step TQA-solving prompt from this pipeline, using demonstrations with SS-CoT paths to guide the LLM in solving complex TQA tasks under In-Context Learning settings. Our experiments show that our approaches result in improved performance and reliability while being efficient. Our findings emphasize the importance of eliciting LLMs' reasoning capabilities to handle complex TQA tasks effectively.

Related papers

• Supervised Fine-Tuning Achieve Rapid Task Adaption Via Alternating Attention Head Activation Patterns [47.57912649802414]
  We study the process that the SFT process adapts LLMs to downstream tasks via the perspective of attention patterns. We find that LLMs selectively activate task-specific attention heads during SFT; (2) activation patterns for complex tasks are combinations of basic task patterns; and (3) changes in a few parameters can significantly impact activation patterns after SFT on a small number of samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T07:34:50Z)
• When does In-context Learning Fall Short and Why? A Study on Specification-Heavy Tasks [54.71034943526973]
  In-context learning (ICL) has become the default method for using large language models (LLMs) We find that ICL falls short of handling specification-heavy tasks, which are tasks with complicated and extensive task specifications. We identify three primary reasons: inability to specifically understand context, misalignment in task schema comprehension with humans, and inadequate long-text understanding ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T14:26:30Z)
• In-Context Ability Transfer for Question Decomposition in Complex QA [6.745884231594893]
  We propose icat (In-Context Ability Transfer) to solve complex question-answering tasks. We transfer the ability to decompose complex questions to simpler questions or generate step-by-step rationales to LLMs. We conduct large-scale experiments on a variety of complex QA tasks involving numerical reasoning, compositional complex QA, and heterogeneous complex QA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T11:11:07Z)
• Improving Large Language Models in Event Relation Logical Prediction [33.88499005859982]
  Event relation extraction is a challenging task that demands thorough semantic understanding and rigorous logical reasoning. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth investigation to systematically explore the capability of LLMs in understanding and applying event relation logic. Our study reveals that LLMs are not logically consistent reasoners, which results in their suboptimal performance on tasks that need rigorous reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T14:53:06Z)
• Thought Propagation: An Analogical Approach to Complex Reasoning with Large Language Models [62.96551299003463]
  We propose textbftextitThought Propagation (TP) to enhance the complex reasoning ability of Large Language Models. TP first prompts LLMs to propose and solve a set of analogous problems that are related to the input one. TP reuses the results of analogous problems to directly yield a new solution or derive a knowledge-intensive plan for execution to amend the initial solution obtained from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T01:40:09Z)
• SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Prompting [68.40726892904286]
  We propose a new satisfiability-aided language modeling (SatLM) approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We use an LLM to generate a declarative task specification rather than an imperative program and leverage an off-the-shelf automated theorem prover to derive the final answer. We evaluate SATLM on 8 different datasets and show that it consistently outperforms program-aided LMs in the imperative paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T17:55:51Z)
• Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models [26.5029080638055]
  This paper proposes a new method, Active-Prompt, to adapt large language models to different tasks. By borrowing ideas from the related problem of uncertainty-based active learning, we introduce several metrics to characterize the uncertainty. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method, achieving state-of-the-art on eight complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T18:58:59Z)
• Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Tasks [55.42850359286304]
  We propose Decomposed Prompting to solve complex tasks by decomposing them (via prompting) into simpler sub-tasks. This modular structure allows each prompt to be optimized for its specific sub-task. We show that the flexibility and modularity of Decomposed Prompting allows it to outperform prior work on few-shot prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T17:28:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.