DetoxBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multitask Fraud & Abuse Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06072v1
• Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:12:03 GMT
• Title: DetoxBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multitask Fraud & Abuse Detection
• Authors: Joymallya Chakraborty, Wei Xia, Anirban Majumder, Dan Ma, Walid Chaabene, Naveed Janvekar,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing tasks. We present a benchmark suite designed to assess the performance of LLMs in identifying and mitigating fraudulent and abusive language.
• Score: 15.933013428603152
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing tasks. However, their practical application in high-stake domains, such as fraud and abuse detection, remains an area that requires further exploration. The existing applications often narrowly focus on specific tasks like toxicity or hate speech detection. In this paper, we present a comprehensive benchmark suite designed to assess the performance of LLMs in identifying and mitigating fraudulent and abusive language across various real-world scenarios. Our benchmark encompasses a diverse set of tasks, including detecting spam emails, hate speech, misogynistic language, and more. We evaluated several state-of-the-art LLMs, including models from Anthropic, Mistral AI, and the AI21 family, to provide a comprehensive assessment of their capabilities in this critical domain. The results indicate that while LLMs exhibit proficient baseline performance in individual fraud and abuse detection tasks, their performance varies considerably across tasks, particularly struggling with tasks that demand nuanced pragmatic reasoning, such as identifying diverse forms of misogynistic language. These findings have important implications for the responsible development and deployment of LLMs in high-risk applications. Our benchmark suite can serve as a tool for researchers and practitioners to systematically evaluate LLMs for multi-task fraud detection and drive the creation of more robust, trustworthy, and ethically-aligned systems for fraud and abuse detection.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Large and Small MLLMs [71.78055760441256]
  Large multimodal language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in understanding and generating multimodal content. However, their deployment faces significant challenges, including slow inference, high computational cost, and impracticality for on-device applications. Small MLLMs, exemplified by the LLava-series models and Phi-3-Vision, offer promising alternatives with faster inference, reduced deployment costs, and the ability to handle domain-specific scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-04T07:44:49Z)
• A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Open Research Challenges, and Future Directions [9.045698110081686]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate plausible, factually-incorrect responses, which are expressed with striking confidence. Previous work has shown that hallucinations and other non-factual responses generated by LLMs can be detected by examining the uncertainty of the LLM in its response to the pertinent prompt. This survey seeks to provide an extensive review of existing uncertainty quantification methods for LLMs, identifying their salient features, along with their strengths and weaknesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-07T06:56:01Z)
• Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement [51.601916604301685]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate content that can undermine trust in online discourse. Current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of real-world scenarios like human-LLM collaboration. To move beyond binary classification and address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm for detecting LLM-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T08:14:10Z)
• ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection [60.297079601066784]
  We introduce ErrorRadar, the first benchmark designed to assess MLLMs' capabilities in error detection. ErrorRadar evaluates two sub-tasks: error step identification and error categorization. It consists of 2,500 high-quality multimodal K-12 mathematical problems, collected from real-world student interactions. Results indicate significant challenges still remain, as GPT-4o with best performance is still around 10% behind human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T14:59:09Z)
• Defining Boundaries: A Spectrum of Task Feasibility for Large Language Models [6.008311204104302]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various tasks but often fail to handle queries that exceed their knowledge and capabilities. This paper addresses the need for LLMs to recognize and refuse infeasible tasks due to the required skills surpassing their capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-11T22:58:23Z)
• AutoDetect: Towards a Unified Framework for Automated Weakness Detection in Large Language Models [95.09157454599605]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly powerful, but they still exhibit significant but subtle weaknesses. Traditional benchmarking approaches cannot thoroughly pinpoint specific model deficiencies. We introduce a unified framework, AutoDetect, to automatically expose weaknesses in LLMs across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T15:16:45Z)
• RUPBench: Benchmarking Reasoning Under Perturbations for Robustness Evaluation in Large Language Models [12.112914393948415]
  We present RUPBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) across diverse reasoning tasks. Our benchmark incorporates 15 reasoning datasets, categorized into commonsense, arithmetic, logical, and knowledge-intensive reasoning. By examining the performance of state-of-the-art LLMs such as GPT-4o, Llama3, Phi-3, and Gemma on both original and perturbed datasets, we provide a detailed analysis of their robustness and error patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T17:26:44Z)
• GPT as Psychologist? Preliminary Evaluations for GPT-4V on Visual Affective Computing [74.68232970965595]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are designed to process and integrate information from multiple sources, such as text, speech, images, and videos. This paper assesses the application of MLLMs with 5 crucial abilities for affective computing, spanning from visual affective tasks and reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T13:56:25Z)
• Beyond the Known: Investigating LLMs Performance on Out-of-Domain Intent Detection [34.135738700682055]
  This paper conducts a comprehensive evaluation of large language models (LLMs) represented by ChatGPT. We find that LLMs exhibit strong zero-shot and few-shot capabilities, but is still at a disadvantage compared to models fine-tuned with full resource.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T07:02:10Z)
• SHIELD : An Evaluation Benchmark for Face Spoofing and Forgery Detection with Multimodal Large Language Models [63.946809247201905]
  We introduce a new benchmark, namely SHIELD, to evaluate the ability of MLLMs on face spoofing and forgery detection. We design true/false and multiple-choice questions to evaluate multimodal face data in these two face security tasks. The results indicate that MLLMs hold substantial potential in the face security domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T17:31:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.