Understanding and Mitigating the Impacts of Differentially Private Census Data on State Level Redistricting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06801v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:11:54 GMT
• Title: Understanding and Mitigating the Impacts of Differentially Private Census Data on State Level Redistricting
• Authors: Christian Cianfarani, Aloni Cohen,
• Abstract summary: Data users were shaken by the adoption of differential privacy in the 2020 DAS. We consider two redistricting settings in which a data user might be concerned about the impacts of privacy preserving noise. We observe that an analyst may come to incorrect conclusions if they do not account for noise.
• Score: 4.589972411795548
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Data from the Decennial Census is published only after applying a disclosure avoidance system (DAS). Data users were shaken by the adoption of differential privacy in the 2020 DAS, a radical departure from past methods. The change raises the question of whether redistricting law permits, forbids, or requires taking account of the effect of disclosure avoidance. Such uncertainty creates legal risks for redistricters, as Alabama argued in a lawsuit seeking to prevent the 2020 DAS's deployment. We consider two redistricting settings in which a data user might be concerned about the impacts of privacy preserving noise: drawing equal population districts and litigating voting rights cases. What discrepancies arise if the user does nothing to account for disclosure avoidance? How might the user adapt her analyses to mitigate those discrepancies? We study these questions by comparing the official 2010 Redistricting Data to the 2010 Demonstration Data -- created using the 2020 DAS -- in an analysis of millions of algorithmically generated state legislative redistricting plans. In both settings, we observe that an analyst may come to incorrect conclusions if they do not account for noise. With minor adaptations, though, the underlying policy goals remain achievable: tweaking selection criteria enables a redistricter to draw balanced plans, and illustrative plans can still be used as evidence of the maximum number of majority-minority districts that are possible in a geography. At least for state legislatures, Alabama's claim that differential privacy ``inhibits a State's right to draw fair lines'' appears unfounded.

Related papers

• The 2020 United States Decennial Census Is More Private Than You (Might) Think [25.32778927275117]
  We show that between 8.50% and 13.76% of the privacy budget for the 2020 U.S. Census remains unused for each of the eight geographical levels. We mitigate noise variances by 15.08% to 24.82% while maintaining the same privacy budget for each geographical level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T23:06:15Z)
• Efficient Weighting Schemes for Auditing Instant-Runoff Voting Elections [57.67176250198289]
  AWAIRE involves adaptively weighted averages of test statistics, essentially "learning" an effective set of hypotheses to test. We explore schemes and settings more extensively, to identify and recommend efficient choices for practice. A limitation of the current AWAIRE implementation is its restriction to a small number of candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T10:13:01Z)
• The Impact of Differential Feature Under-reporting on Algorithmic Fairness [86.275300739926]
  We present an analytically tractable model of differential feature under-reporting. We then use to characterize the impact of this kind of data bias on algorithmic fairness. Our results show that, in real world data settings, under-reporting typically leads to increasing disparities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T19:16:22Z)
• Comment: The Essential Role of Policy Evaluation for the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System [0.0]
  boyd and Sarathy, "Differential Perspectives: Epistemic Disconnects Surrounding the US Census Bureau's Use of Differential Privacy" We argue that empirical evaluations of the Census Disclosure Avoidance System failed to recognize how the benchmark data is never a ground truth of population counts. We argue that policy makers must confront a key trade-off between data utility and privacy protection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T21:41:54Z)
• Mathematically Quantifying Non-responsiveness of the 2021 Georgia Congressional Districting Plan [3.097163558730473]
  We use a Metropolized-sampling technique through a parallel tempering method combined with ReCom. We develop these improvements through the first case study of district plans in Georgia. Our analysis projects that any election in Georgia will reliably elect 9 Republicans and 5 Democrats under the enacted plan.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-13T02:58:32Z)
• Census TopDown: The Impacts of Differential Privacy on Redistricting [0.3746889836344765]
  We consider several key applications of Census data in redistricting. We find reassuring evidence that TopDown will not threaten the ability to produce districts with tolerable population balance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T23:28:53Z)
• Identification of Subgroups With Similar Benefits in Off-Policy Policy Evaluation [60.71312668265873]
  We develop a method to balance the need for personalization with confident predictions. We show that our method can be used to form accurate predictions of heterogeneous treatment effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-28T23:19:12Z)
• The Impact of the U.S. Census Disclosure Avoidance System on Redistricting and Voting Rights Analysis [0.0]
  The US Census Bureau plans to protect the privacy of 2020 Census respondents through its Disclosure Avoidance System (DAS) We find that the protected data are not of sufficient quality for redistricting purposes. Our analysis finds that the DAS-protected data are biased against certain areas, depending on voter turnout and partisan and racial composition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T03:32:36Z)
• Balancing Biases and Preserving Privacy on Balanced Faces in the Wild [50.915684171879036]
  There are demographic biases present in current facial recognition (FR) models. We introduce our Balanced Faces in the Wild dataset to measure these biases across different ethnic and gender subgroups. We find that relying on a single score threshold to differentiate between genuine and imposters sample pairs leads to suboptimal results. We propose a novel domain adaptation learning scheme that uses facial features extracted from state-of-the-art neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T15:05:49Z)
• Privacy Preserving Recalibration under Domain Shift [119.21243107946555]
  We introduce a framework that abstracts out the properties of recalibration problems under differential privacy constraints. We also design a novel recalibration algorithm, accuracy temperature scaling, that outperforms prior work on private datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T18:43:37Z)
• Provably Good Batch Reinforcement Learning Without Great Exploration [51.51462608429621]
  Batch reinforcement learning (RL) is important to apply RL algorithms to many high stakes tasks. Recent algorithms have shown promise but can still be overly optimistic in their expected outcomes. We show that a small modification to Bellman optimality and evaluation back-up to take a more conservative update can have much stronger guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T09:25:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.