Selling Joint Ads: A Regret Minimization Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07819v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:59:10 GMT
• Title: Selling Joint Ads: A Regret Minimization Perspective
• Authors: Gagan Aggarwal, Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, Paul Dütting, Federico Fusco,
• Abstract summary: Motivated by online retail, we consider the problem of selling one item (e.g., an ad slot) to two non-excludable buyers (say, a merchant and a brand) This problem captures, for example, situations where a merchant and a brand bid cooperatively in an auction to advertise a product, and both benefit from the ad being shown. A mechanism collects bids from the two and decides whether to allocate and which payments the two parties should make.
• Score: 7.288063443108292
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Motivated by online retail, we consider the problem of selling one item (e.g., an ad slot) to two non-excludable buyers (say, a merchant and a brand). This problem captures, for example, situations where a merchant and a brand cooperatively bid in an auction to advertise a product, and both benefit from the ad being shown. A mechanism collects bids from the two and decides whether to allocate and which payments the two parties should make. This gives rise to intricate incentive compatibility constraints, e.g., on how to split payments between the two parties. We approach the problem of finding a revenue-maximizing incentive-compatible mechanism from an online learning perspective; this poses significant technical challenges. First, the action space (the class of all possible mechanisms) is huge; second, the function that maps mechanisms to revenue is highly irregular, ruling out standard discretization-based approaches. In the stochastic setting, we design an efficient learning algorithm achieving a regret bound of $O(T^{3/4})$. Our approach is based on an adaptive discretization scheme of the space of mechanisms, as any non-adaptive discretization fails to achieve sublinear regret. In the adversarial setting, we exploit the non-Lipschitzness of the problem to prove a strong negative result, namely that no learning algorithm can achieve more than half of the revenue of the best fixed mechanism in hindsight. We then consider the $\sigma$-smooth adversary; we construct an efficient learning algorithm that achieves a regret bound of $O(T^{2/3})$ and builds on a succinct encoding of exponentially many experts. Finally, we prove that no learning algorithm can achieve less than $\Omega(\sqrt T)$ regret in both the stochastic and the smooth setting, thus narrowing the range where the minimax regret rates for these two problems lie.

Related papers

• Multi-Agent Imitation Learning: Value is Easy, Regret is Hard [52.31989962031179]
  We study a multi-agent imitation learning (MAIL) problem where we take the perspective of a learner attempting to coordinate a group of agents. Most prior work in MAIL essentially reduces the problem to matching the behavior of the expert within the support of the demonstrations. While doing so is sufficient to drive the value gap between the learner and the expert to zero under the assumption that agents are non-strategic, it does not guarantee to deviations by strategic agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T16:18:20Z)
• Learning to Maximize Gains From Trade in Small Markets [6.204762177970342]
  We study the problem of designing a two-sided market (double auction) under the constraints of (dominant-strategy) incentive compatibility and budget-balance. Our result is a general impossibility for the case of correlated distributions of values even between one seller and two buyers. Our second is an efficient learning algorithm for one seller and two buyers in the case of independent distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-21T20:57:12Z)
• Variance-Aware Regret Bounds for Stochastic Contextual Dueling Bandits [53.281230333364505]
  This paper studies the problem of contextual dueling bandits, where the binary comparison of dueling arms is generated from a generalized linear model (GLM) We propose a new SupLinUCB-type algorithm that enjoys computational efficiency and a variance-aware regret bound $tilde Obig(dsqrtsum_t=1Tsigma_t2 + dbig)$. Our regret bound naturally aligns with the intuitive expectation in scenarios where the comparison is deterministic, the algorithm only suffers from an $tilde O(d)$ regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T08:15:52Z)
• Online Learning under Budget and ROI Constraints via Weak Adaptivity [57.097119428915796]
  Existing primal-dual algorithms for constrained online learning problems rely on two fundamental assumptions. We show how such assumptions can be circumvented by endowing standard primal-dual templates with weakly adaptive regret minimizers. We prove the first best-of-both-worlds no-regret guarantees which hold in absence of the two aforementioned assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T16:30:33Z)
• Constrained Online Two-stage Stochastic Optimization: Near Optimal Algorithms via Adversarial Learning [1.994307489466967]
  We consider an online two-stage optimization with long-term constraints over a finite horizon of $T$ periods. We develop online algorithms for the online two-stage problem from adversarial learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T10:33:09Z)
• Autobidders with Budget and ROI Constraints: Efficiency, Regret, and Pacing Dynamics [53.62091043347035]
  We study a game between autobidding algorithms that compete in an online advertising platform. We propose a gradient-based learning algorithm that is guaranteed to satisfy all constraints and achieves vanishing individual regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T21:59:30Z)
• A Reinforcement Learning Approach in Multi-Phase Second-Price Auction Design [158.0041488194202]
  We study reserve price optimization in multi-phase second price auctions. From the seller's perspective, we need to efficiently explore the environment in the presence of potentially nontruthful bidders. Third, the seller's per-step revenue is unknown, nonlinear, and cannot even be directly observed from the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T03:49:05Z)
• Benefits of Permutation-Equivariance in Auction Mechanisms [90.42990121652956]
  An auction mechanism that maximizes the auctioneer's revenue while minimizes bidders' ex-post regret is an important yet intricate problem in economics. Remarkable progress has been achieved through learning the optimal auction mechanism by neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T16:13:25Z)
• Online Bidding Algorithms for Return-on-Spend Constrained Advertisers [10.500109788348732]
  This work explores efficient online algorithms for a single value-maximizing advertiser under an increasingly popular constraint: Return-on-Spend (RoS) We contribute a simple online algorithm that achieves near-optimal regret in expectation while always respecting the specified RoS constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-29T16:49:24Z)
• Efficient Algorithms for Stochastic Repeated Second-price Auctions [0.0]
  We develop efficient sequential bidding strategies for repeated auctions. We provide the first parametric lower bound for this problem. We propose more explainable strategies which are reminiscent of the Explore Then Commit bandit algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-10T12:45:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.