Real or Robotic? Assessing Whether LLMs Accurately Simulate Qualities of Human Responses in Dialogue

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08330v2
• Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:19:15 GMT
• Title: Real or Robotic? Assessing Whether LLMs Accurately Simulate Qualities of Human Responses in Dialogue
• Authors: Jonathan Ivey, Shivani Kumar, Jiayu Liu, Hua Shen, Sushrita Rakshit, Rohan Raju, Haotian Zhang, Aparna Ananthasubramaniam, Junghwan Kim, Bowen Yi, Dustin Wright, Abraham Israeli, Anders Giovanni Møller, Lechen Zhang, David Jurgens,
• Abstract summary: We generate a large-scale dataset of 100,000 paired LLM-LLM and human-LLM dialogues from the WildChat dataset. We find relatively low alignment between simulations and human interactions, demonstrating a systematic divergence along the multiple textual properties.
• Score: 25.89926022671521
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Studying and building datasets for dialogue tasks is both expensive and time-consuming due to the need to recruit, train, and collect data from study participants. In response, much recent work has sought to use large language models (LLMs) to simulate both human-human and human-LLM interactions, as they have been shown to generate convincingly human-like text in many settings. However, to what extent do LLM-based simulations \textit{actually} reflect human dialogues? In this work, we answer this question by generating a large-scale dataset of 100,000 paired LLM-LLM and human-LLM dialogues from the WildChat dataset and quantifying how well the LLM simulations align with their human counterparts. Overall, we find relatively low alignment between simulations and human interactions, demonstrating a systematic divergence along the multiple textual properties, including style and content. Further, in comparisons of English, Chinese, and Russian dialogues, we find that models perform similarly. Our results suggest that LLMs generally perform better when the human themself writes in a way that is more similar to the LLM's own style.

Related papers

• NewsInterview: a Dataset and a Playground to Evaluate LLMs' Ground Gap via Informational Interviews [65.35458530702442]
  We focus on journalistic interviews, a domain rich in grounding communication and abundant in data. We curate a dataset of 40,000 two-person informational interviews from NPR and CNN. LLMs are significantly less likely than human interviewers to use acknowledgements and to pivot to higher-level questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T01:37:38Z)
• Self-Directed Turing Test for Large Language Models [56.64615470513102]
  The Turing test examines whether AIs can exhibit human-like behaviour in natural language conversations. Traditional Turing tests adopt a rigid dialogue format where each participant sends only one message each time. This paper proposes the Self-Directed Turing Test, which extends the original test with a burst dialogue format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T09:57:28Z)
• LLM Roleplay: Simulating Human-Chatbot Interaction [52.03241266241294]
  We propose a goal-oriented, persona-based method to automatically generate diverse multi-turn dialogues simulating human-chatbot interaction. Our method can simulate human-chatbot dialogues with a high indistinguishability rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T14:49:46Z)
• Beyond the Turn-Based Game: Enabling Real-Time Conversations with Duplex Models [66.24055500785657]
  Traditional turn-based chat systems prevent users from verbally interacting with system while it is generating responses. To overcome these limitations, we adapt existing LLMs to listen users while generating output and provide users with instant feedback. We build a dataset consisting of alternating time slices of queries and responses as well as covering typical feedback types in instantaneous interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T03:20:10Z)
• Do Language Models Enjoy Their Own Stories? Prompting Large Language Models for Automatic Story Evaluation [15.718288693929019]
  Large Language Models (LLM) achieve state-of-the-art performance on many NLP tasks. We study whether LLMs can be used as substitutes for human annotators. We find that LLMs outperform current automatic measures for system-level evaluation but still struggle to provide satisfactory explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T15:56:52Z)
• DuetSim: Building User Simulator with Dual Large Language Models for Task-Oriented Dialogues [7.765092134290888]
  This paper introduces DuetSim, a novel framework designed to address the intricate demands of task-oriented dialogues by leveraging large language models. DuetSim stands apart from conventional approaches by employing two LLMs in tandem: one dedicated to response generation and the other focused on verification. We validate the efficacy of our method through extensive experiments conducted on the MultiWOZ dataset, highlighting improvements in response quality and correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T06:24:31Z)
• Bootstrapping LLM-based Task-Oriented Dialogue Agents via Self-Talk [11.706292228586332]
  Large language models (LLMs) are powerful dialogue agents, but specializing them towards fulfilling a specific function can be challenging. We propose a more effective method for data collection through LLMs engaging in a conversation in various roles. This approach generates a training data via "self-talk" of LLMs that can be refined and utilized for supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T09:49:10Z)
• Let the LLMs Talk: Simulating Human-to-Human Conversational QA via Zero-Shot LLM-to-LLM Interactions [19.365615476223635]
  Conversational question-answering systems aim to create interactive search systems that retrieve information by interacting with users. Existing work uses human annotators to play the roles of the questioner (student) and the answerer (teacher) We propose a simulation framework that employs zero-shot learner LLMs for simulating teacher-student interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T17:38:02Z)
• Zero-Shot Goal-Directed Dialogue via RL on Imagined Conversations [70.7884839812069]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful and general solutions to many natural language tasks. However, many of the most important applications of language generation are interactive, where an agent has to talk to a person to reach a desired outcome. In this work, we explore a new method for adapting LLMs with RL for such goal-directed dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T18:45:16Z)
• BotChat: Evaluating LLMs' Capabilities of Having Multi-Turn Dialogues [72.65163468440434]
  This report provides a preliminary evaluation of existing large language models for human-style multi-turn chatting. We prompt large language models (LLMs) to generate a full multi-turn dialogue based on the ChatSEED, utterance by utterance. We find GPT-4 can generate human-style multi-turn dialogues with impressive quality, significantly outperforms its counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T16:53:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.