Label Convergence: Defining an Upper Performance Bound in Object Recognition through Contradictory Annotations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.09412v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 10:59:25 GMT
• Title: Label Convergence: Defining an Upper Performance Bound in Object Recognition through Contradictory Annotations
• Authors: David Tschirschwitz, Volker Rodehorst,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the notion of "label convergence" to describe the highest achievable performance under the constraint of contradictory test annotations. We approximate that label convergence is between 62.63-67.52 mAP@[0.5:0.95:0.05] for LVIS with 95% confidence, attributing these bounds to the presence of real annotation errors. With current state-of-the-art (SOTA) models at the upper end of the label convergence interval for the well-studied LVIS dataset, we conclude that model capacity is sufficient to solve current object detection problems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Annotation errors are a challenge not only during training of machine learning models, but also during their evaluation. Label variations and inaccuracies in datasets often manifest as contradictory examples that deviate from established labeling conventions. Such inconsistencies, when significant, prevent models from achieving optimal performance on metrics such as mean Average Precision (mAP). We introduce the notion of "label convergence" to describe the highest achievable performance under the constraint of contradictory test annotations, essentially defining an upper bound on model accuracy. Recognizing that noise is an inherent characteristic of all data, our study analyzes five real-world datasets, including the LVIS dataset, to investigate the phenomenon of label convergence. We approximate that label convergence is between 62.63-67.52 mAP@[0.5:0.95:0.05] for LVIS with 95% confidence, attributing these bounds to the presence of real annotation errors. With current state-of-the-art (SOTA) models at the upper end of the label convergence interval for the well-studied LVIS dataset, we conclude that model capacity is sufficient to solve current object detection problems. Therefore, future efforts should focus on three key aspects: (1) updating the problem specification and adjusting evaluation practices to account for unavoidable label noise, (2) creating cleaner data, especially test data, and (3) including multi-annotated data to investigate annotation variation and make these issues visible from the outset.

Related papers

• Mitigating Distributional Shift in Semantic Segmentation via Uncertainty Estimation from Unlabelled Data [19.000718685399935]
  This work presents a segmentation network that can detect errors caused by challenging test domains without any additional annotation in a single forward pass. We use easy-to-obtain, uncurated and unlabelled data to learn to perform uncertainty estimation selectively by enforcing consistency over data augmentation. The proposed method, named Gamma-SSL, consistently outperforms uncertainty estimation and Out-of-Distribution (OoD) techniques on this difficult benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T16:23:11Z)
• DAGnosis: Localized Identification of Data Inconsistencies using Structures [73.39285449012255]
  Identification and appropriate handling of inconsistencies in data at deployment time is crucial to reliably use machine learning models. We use directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to encode the training set's features probability distribution and independencies as a structure. Our method, called DAGnosis, leverages these structural interactions to bring valuable and insightful data-centric conclusions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T11:29:16Z)
• CAMELL: Confidence-based Acquisition Model for Efficient Self-supervised Active Learning with Label Validation [6.918298428336528]
  Supervised neural approaches are hindered by their dependence on large, meticulously annotated datasets. We present textbfCAMELL, a pool-based active learning framework tailored for sequential multi-output problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T08:19:31Z)
• Rethinking Precision of Pseudo Label: Test-Time Adaptation via Complementary Learning [10.396596055773012]
  We propose a novel complementary learning approach to enhance test-time adaptation. In test-time adaptation tasks, information from the source domain is typically unavailable. We highlight that the risk function of complementary labels agrees with their Vanilla loss formula.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-15T03:36:33Z)
• Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectors [105.12462629663757]
  In this work, we aggregate factuality error annotations from nine existing datasets and stratify them according to the underlying summarization model. We compare performance of state-of-the-art factuality metrics, including recent ChatGPT-based metrics, on this stratified benchmark and show that their performance varies significantly across different types of summarization models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T15:26:48Z)
• Striking a Balance: Alleviating Inconsistency in Pre-trained Models for Symmetric Classification Tasks [4.971443651456398]
  inconsistency is often observed in the predicted labels or confidence scores. We highlight this model shortcoming and apply a consistency loss function to alleviate inconsistency in symmetric classification. Our results show an improved consistency in predictions for three paraphrase detection datasets without a significant drop in the accuracy scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T07:55:39Z)
• Adversarial Dual-Student with Differentiable Spatial Warping for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation [70.2166826794421]
  We propose a differentiable geometric warping to conduct unsupervised data augmentation. We also propose a novel adversarial dual-student framework to improve the Mean-Teacher. Our solution significantly improves the performance and state-of-the-art results are achieved on both datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-05T17:36:17Z)
• Attentive Prototypes for Source-free Unsupervised Domain Adaptive 3D Object Detection [85.11649974840758]
  3D object detection networks tend to be biased towards the data they are trained on. We propose a single-frame approach for source-free, unsupervised domain adaptation of lidar-based 3D object detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T18:42:42Z)
• WSSOD: A New Pipeline for Weakly- and Semi-Supervised Object Detection [75.80075054706079]
  We propose a weakly- and semi-supervised object detection framework (WSSOD) An agent detector is first trained on a joint dataset and then used to predict pseudo bounding boxes on weakly-annotated images. The proposed framework demonstrates remarkable performance on PASCAL-VOC and MSCOCO benchmark, achieving a high performance comparable to those obtained in fully-supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-21T11:58:50Z)
• Exploiting Sample Uncertainty for Domain Adaptive Person Re-Identification [137.9939571408506]
  We estimate and exploit the credibility of the assigned pseudo-label of each sample to alleviate the influence of noisy labels. Our uncertainty-guided optimization brings significant improvement and achieves the state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T04:09:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.