RethinkMCTS: Refining Erroneous Thoughts in Monte Carlo Tree Search for Code Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.09584v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 02:07:28 GMT
• Title: RethinkMCTS: Refining Erroneous Thoughts in Monte Carlo Tree Search for Code Generation
• Authors: Qingyao Li, Wei Xia, Kounianhua Du, Xinyi Dai, Ruiming Tang, Yasheng Wang, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce RethinkMCTS, which employs the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm to conduct thought-level searches before generating code. We construct verbal feedback from fine-turbo code execution feedback to refine erroneous thoughts during the search. We demonstrate that RethinkMCTS outperforms previous search-based and feedback-based code generation baselines.
• Score: 65.5353313491402
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: LLM agents enhanced by tree search algorithms have yielded notable performances in code generation. However, current search algorithms in this domain suffer from low search quality due to several reasons: 1) Ineffective design of the search space for the high-reasoning demands of code generation tasks, 2) Inadequate integration of code feedback with the search algorithm, and 3) Poor handling of negative feedback during the search, leading to reduced search efficiency and quality. To address these challenges, we propose to search for the reasoning process of the code and use the detailed feedback of code execution to refine erroneous thoughts during the search. In this paper, we introduce RethinkMCTS, which employs the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm to conduct thought-level searches before generating code, thereby exploring a wider range of strategies. More importantly, we construct verbal feedback from fine-grained code execution feedback to refine erroneous thoughts during the search. This ensures that the search progresses along the correct reasoning paths, thus improving the overall search quality of the tree by leveraging execution feedback. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that RethinkMCTS outperforms previous search-based and feedback-based code generation baselines. On the HumanEval dataset, it improves the pass@1 of GPT-3.5-turbo from 70.12 to 89.02 and GPT-4o-mini from 87.20 to 94.51. It effectively conducts more thorough exploration through thought-level searches and enhances the search quality of the entire tree by incorporating rethink operation.

Related papers

• CodeTree: Agent-guided Tree Search for Code Generation with Large Language Models [91.15135237584771]
  Large language models (LLMs) can act as agents with capabilities to self-refine and improve generated code autonomously. We propose CodeTree, a framework for LLM agents to efficiently explore the search space in different stages of the code generation process. Specifically, we adopted a unified tree structure to explicitly explore different coding strategies, generate corresponding coding solutions, and subsequently refine the solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T00:09:54Z)
• Tree Search for Language Model Agents [69.43007235771383]
  We propose an inference-time search algorithm for LM agents to perform exploration and multi-step planning in interactive web environments. Our approach is a form of best-first tree search that operates within the actual environment space. It is the first tree search algorithm for LM agents that shows effectiveness on realistic web tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:07:55Z)
• LiteSearch: Efficacious Tree Search for LLM [70.29796112457662]
  This study introduces a novel guided tree search algorithm with dynamic node selection and node-level exploration budget. Experiments conducted on the GSM8K and TabMWP datasets demonstrate that our approach enjoys significantly lower computational costs compared to baseline methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T05:14:04Z)
• Autonomous Tree-search Ability of Large Language Models [58.68735916408101]
  Large Language Models have excelled in remarkable reasoning capabilities with advanced prompting techniques. Recent works propose to utilize external programs to define search logic, such that LLMs can perform passive tree search to solve more challenging reasoning tasks. We propose a new concept called autonomous tree-search ability of LLM, which can automatically generate a response containing search trajectories for the correct answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T14:14:38Z)
• Constructing Tree-based Index for Efficient and Effective Dense Retrieval [26.706985694158384]
  JTR stands for Joint optimization of TRee-based index and query encoding. We design a new unified contrastive learning loss to train tree-based index and query encoder in an end-to-end manner. Experimental results show that JTR achieves better retrieval performance while retaining high system efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T09:25:39Z)
• Zero-Shot Retrieval with Search Agents and Hybrid Environments [8.017306481455778]
  Current language models can learn symbolic query reformulation policies, in combination with traditional term-based retrieval, but fall short of outperforming neural retrievers. We extend the previous learning to search setup to a hybrid environment, which accepts discrete query refinement operations, after a first-pass retrieval step via a dual encoder. Experiments on the BEIR task show that search agents, trained via behavioral cloning, outperform the underlying search system based on a combined dual encoder retriever and cross encoder reranker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T13:50:25Z)
• Accelerating Code Search with Deep Hashing and Code Classification [64.3543949306799]
  Code search is to search reusable code snippets from source code corpus based on natural languages queries. We propose a novel method CoSHC to accelerate code search with deep hashing and code classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T07:05:30Z)
• Searching for a Search Method: Benchmarking Search Algorithms for Generating NLP Adversarial Examples [10.993342896547691]
  We study the behavior of several black-box search algorithms used for generating adversarial examples for natural language processing (NLP) tasks. We perform a fine-grained analysis of three elements relevant to search: search algorithm, search space, and search budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-09T17:04:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.