Performance of Human Annotators in Object Detection and Segmentation of Remotely Sensed Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10272v2
• Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 15:41:40 GMT
• Title: Performance of Human Annotators in Object Detection and Segmentation of Remotely Sensed Data
• Authors: Roni Blushtein-Livnon, Tal Svoray, Michael Dorman,
• Abstract summary: This study aims to assess the influence of annotation strategies, levels of imbalanced data, and prior experience, on the performance of human annotators. The experiment is conducted using images with a pixel size of 0.15textbf$m$, involving both expert and non-expert participants.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This study introduces a laboratory experiment designed to assess the influence of annotation strategies, levels of imbalanced data, and prior experience, on the performance of human annotators. The experiment focuses on labeling aerial imagery, using ArcGIS Pro tools, to detect and segment small-scale photovoltaic solar panels, selected as a case study for rectangular objects. The experiment is conducted using images with a pixel size of 0.15\textbf{$m$}, involving both expert and non-expert participants, across different setup strategies and target-background ratio datasets. Our findings indicate that human annotators generally perform more effectively in object detection than in segmentation tasks. A marked tendency to commit more Type II errors (False Negatives, i.e., undetected objects) than Type I errors (False Positives, i.e. falsely detecting objects that do not exist) was observed across all experimental setups and conditions, suggesting a consistent bias in detection and segmentation processes. Performance was better in tasks with higher target-background ratios (i.e., more objects per unit area). Prior experience did not significantly impact performance and may, in some cases, even lead to overestimation in segmentation. These results provide evidence that human annotators are relatively cautious and tend to identify objects only when they are confident about them, prioritizing underestimation over overestimation. Annotators' performance is also influenced by object scarcity, showing a decline in areas with extremely imbalanced datasets and a low ratio of target-to-background. These findings may enhance annotation strategies for remote sensing research while efficient human annotators are crucial in an era characterized by growing demands for high-quality training data to improve segmentation and detection models.

Related papers

• Better Sampling, towards Better End-to-end Small Object Detection [7.7473020808686694]
  Small object detection remains unsatisfactory due to limited characteristics and high density and mutual overlap. We propose methods enhancing sampling within an end-to-end framework. Our model demonstrates a significant enhancement, achieving a 2.9% increase in average precision (AP) over the state-of-the-art (SOTA) on the VisDrone dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T04:37:44Z)
• Visual Context-Aware Person Fall Detection [52.49277799455569]
  We present a segmentation pipeline to semi-automatically separate individuals and objects in images. Background objects such as beds, chairs, or wheelchairs can challenge fall detection systems, leading to false positive alarms. We demonstrate that object-specific contextual transformations during training effectively mitigate this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T19:06:36Z)
• Innovative Horizons in Aerial Imagery: LSKNet Meets DiffusionDet for Advanced Object Detection [55.2480439325792]
  We present an in-depth evaluation of an object detection model that integrates the LSKNet backbone with the DiffusionDet head. The proposed model achieves a mean average precision (MAP) of approximately 45.7%, which is a significant improvement. This advancement underscores the effectiveness of the proposed modifications and sets a new benchmark in aerial image analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T19:49:13Z)
• Proposal-Contrastive Pretraining for Object Detection from Fewer Data [11.416621957617334]
  We present Proposal Selection Contrast (ProSeCo), a novel unsupervised overall pretraining approach. ProSeCo uses the large number of object proposals generated by the detector for contrastive learning. We show that our method outperforms state of the art in unsupervised pretraining for object detection on standard and novel benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T17:59:26Z)
• Scale-Equivalent Distillation for Semi-Supervised Object Detection [57.59525453301374]
  Recent Semi-Supervised Object Detection (SS-OD) methods are mainly based on self-training, generating hard pseudo-labels by a teacher model on unlabeled data as supervisory signals. We analyze the challenges these methods meet with the empirical experiment results. We introduce a novel approach, Scale-Equivalent Distillation (SED), which is a simple yet effective end-to-end knowledge distillation framework robust to large object size variance and class imbalance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-23T07:33:37Z)
• Unsupervised Domain Adaption of Object Detectors: A Survey [87.08473838767235]
  Recent advances in deep learning have led to the development of accurate and efficient models for various computer vision applications. Learning highly accurate models relies on the availability of datasets with a large number of annotated images. Due to this, model performance drops drastically when evaluated on label-scarce datasets having visually distinct images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T23:34:06Z)
• Robust and Accurate Object Detection via Adversarial Learning [111.36192453882195]
  This work augments the fine-tuning stage for object detectors by exploring adversarial examples. Our approach boosts the performance of state-of-the-art EfficientDets by +1.1 mAP on the object detection benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T19:45:26Z)
• Stance Detection Benchmark: How Robust Is Your Stance Detection? [65.91772010586605]
  Stance Detection (StD) aims to detect an author's stance towards a certain topic or claim. We introduce a StD benchmark that learns from ten StD datasets of various domains in a multi-dataset learning setting. Within this benchmark setup, we are able to present new state-of-the-art results on five of the datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-06T13:37:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.