Revising the Structure of Recurrent Neural Networks to Eliminate Numerical Derivatives in Forming Physics Informed Loss Terms with Respect to Time

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10388v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:24:25 GMT
• Title: Revising the Structure of Recurrent Neural Networks to Eliminate Numerical Derivatives in Forming Physics Informed Loss Terms with Respect to Time
• Authors: Mahyar Jahani-nasab, Mohamad Ali Bijarchi,
• Abstract summary: Mutual Interval RNN (MI-RNN) is applied to solve three different benchmarks: the Burgers equation, unsteady heat conduction in an irregular domain, and the Green vortex problem. Our results demonstrate that MI-RNN can find the exact solution more accurately compared to existing RNN models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Solving unsteady partial differential equations (PDEs) using recurrent neural networks (RNNs) typically requires numerical derivatives between each block of the RNN to form the physics informed loss function. However, this introduces the complexities of numerical derivatives into the training process of these models. In this study, we propose modifying the structure of the traditional RNN to enable the prediction of each block over a time interval, making it possible to calculate the derivative of the output with respect to time using the backpropagation algorithm. To achieve this, the time intervals of these blocks are overlapped, defining a mutual loss function between them. Additionally, the employment of conditional hidden states enables us to achieve a unique solution for each block. The forget factor is utilized to control the influence of the conditional hidden state on the prediction of the subsequent block. This new model, termed the Mutual Interval RNN (MI-RNN), is applied to solve three different benchmarks: the Burgers equation, unsteady heat conduction in an irregular domain, and the Green vortex problem. Our results demonstrate that MI-RNN can find the exact solution more accurately compared to existing RNN models. For instance, in the second problem, MI-RNN achieved one order of magnitude less relative error compared to the RNN model with numerical derivatives.

Related papers

• PMNN:Physical Model-driven Neural Network for solving time-fractional differential equations [17.66402435033991]
  An innovative Physical Model-driven Neural Network (PMNN) method is proposed to solve time-fractional differential equations. It effectively combines deep neural networks (DNNs) with approximation of fractional derivatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T12:43:32Z)
• A predictive physics-aware hybrid reduced order model for reacting flows [65.73506571113623]
  A new hybrid predictive Reduced Order Model (ROM) is proposed to solve reacting flow problems. The number of degrees of freedom is reduced from thousands of temporal points to a few POD modes with their corresponding temporal coefficients. Two different deep learning architectures have been tested to predict the temporal coefficients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-24T08:39:20Z)
• RBF-MGN:Solving spatiotemporal PDEs with Physics-informed Graph Neural Network [4.425915683879297]
  We propose a novel framework based on graph neural networks (GNNs) and radial basis function finite difference (RBF-FD) RBF-FD is used to construct a high-precision difference format of the differential equations to guide model training. We illustrate the generalizability, accuracy, and efficiency of the proposed algorithms on different PDE parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T10:08:02Z)
• Tunable Complexity Benchmarks for Evaluating Physics-Informed Neural Networks on Coupled Ordinary Differential Equations [64.78260098263489]
  In this work, we assess the ability of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve increasingly-complex coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) We show that PINNs eventually fail to produce correct solutions to these benchmarks as their complexity increases. We identify several reasons why this may be the case, including insufficient network capacity, poor conditioning of the ODEs, and high local curvature, as measured by the Laplacian of the PINN loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T15:01:32Z)
• Training Feedback Spiking Neural Networks by Implicit Differentiation on the Equilibrium State [66.2457134675891]
  Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are brain-inspired models that enable energy-efficient implementation on neuromorphic hardware. Most existing methods imitate the backpropagation framework and feedforward architectures for artificial neural networks. We propose a novel training method that does not rely on the exact reverse of the forward computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T07:46:54Z)
• UnICORNN: A recurrent model for learning very long time dependencies [0.0]
  We propose a novel RNN architecture based on a structure preserving discretization of a Hamiltonian system of second-order ordinary differential equations. The resulting RNN is fast, invertible (in time), memory efficient and we derive rigorous bounds on the hidden state gradients to prove the mitigation of the exploding and vanishing gradient problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-09T15:19:59Z)
• Coupled Oscillatory Recurrent Neural Network (coRNN): An accurate and (gradient) stable architecture for learning long time dependencies [15.2292571922932]
  We propose a novel architecture for recurrent neural networks. Our proposed RNN is based on a time-discretization of a system of second-order ordinary differential equations. Experiments show that the proposed RNN is comparable in performance to the state of the art on a variety of benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T12:35:04Z)
• Frequentist Uncertainty in Recurrent Neural Networks via Blockwise Influence Functions [121.10450359856242]
  Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are instrumental in modelling sequential and time-series data. Existing approaches for uncertainty quantification in RNNs are based predominantly on Bayesian methods. We develop a frequentist alternative that: (a) does not interfere with model training or compromise its accuracy, (b) applies to any RNN architecture, and (c) provides theoretical coverage guarantees on the estimated uncertainty intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-20T22:45:32Z)
• Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations [57.90284928158383]
  One of the main challenges in using deep learning-based methods for simulating physical systems is formulating physics-based data. We propose a novel multi-level graph neural network framework that captures interaction at all ranges with only linear complexity. Experiments confirm our multi-graph network learns discretization-invariant solution operators to PDEs and can be evaluated in linear time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T21:56:22Z)
• Liquid Time-constant Networks [117.57116214802504]
  We introduce a new class of time-continuous recurrent neural network models. Instead of declaring a learning system's dynamics by implicit nonlinearities, we construct networks of linear first-order dynamical systems. These neural networks exhibit stable and bounded behavior, yield superior expressivity within the family of neural ordinary differential equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T09:53:35Z)
• Fractional Deep Neural Network via Constrained Optimization [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel algorithmic framework for a deep neural network (DNN) Fractional-DNN can be viewed as a time-discretization of a fractional in time nonlinear ordinary differential equation (ODE)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T21:58:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.