The Relevance of Item-Co-Exposure For Exposure Bias Mitigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12912v2
• Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:36:54 GMT
• Title: The Relevance of Item-Co-Exposure For Exposure Bias Mitigation
• Authors: Thorsten Krause, Alina Deriyeva, Jan Heinrich Beinke, Gerrit York Bartels, Oliver Thomas,
• Abstract summary: In implicit feedback recommender systems influence the logged interactions, and, ultimately, their own recommendations. This effect is called exposure bias and it can lead to issues such as filter bubbles and echo chambers. Previous research employed the multinomial logit model (MNL) with exposure information to reduce exposure bias on synthetic data.
• Score: 0.9903198600681908
• License:
• Abstract: Through exposing items to users, implicit feedback recommender systems influence the logged interactions, and, ultimately, their own recommendations. This effect is called exposure bias and it can lead to issues such as filter bubbles and echo chambers. Previous research employed the multinomial logit model (MNL) with exposure information to reduce exposure bias on synthetic data. This extended abstract summarizes our previous study in which we investigated whether (i) these findings hold for human-generated choices, (ii) other discrete choice models mitigate bias better, and (iii) an item's estimated relevance can depend on the relevances of the other items that were presented with it. We collected a data set of biased and unbiased choices in a controlled online user study and measured the effects of overexposure and competition. We found that (i) the discrete choice models effectively mitigated exposure bias on human-generated choice data, (ii) there were no significant differences in robustness among the different discrete choice models, and (iii) only multivariate discrete choice models were robust to competition between items. We conclude that discrete choice models mitigate exposure bias effectively because they consider item-co-exposure. Moreover, exposing items alongside more or less popular items can bias future recommendations significantly and item exposure must be tracked for overcoming exposure bias. We consider our work vital for understanding what exposure bias it, how it forms, and how it can be mitigated.

Related papers

• A First Look at Selection Bias in Preference Elicitation for Recommendation [64.44255178199846]
  We study the effect of selection bias in preference elicitation on the resulting recommendations. A big hurdle is the lack of any publicly available dataset that has preference elicitation interactions. We propose a simulation of a topic-based preference elicitation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T14:56:56Z)
• Be Aware of the Neighborhood Effect: Modeling Selection Bias under Interference [50.95521705711802]
  Previous studies have focused on addressing selection bias to achieve unbiased learning of the prediction model. This paper formally formulates the neighborhood effect as an interference problem from the perspective of causal inference. We propose a novel ideal loss that can be used to deal with selection bias in the presence of neighborhood effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T15:20:41Z)
• Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendation [59.500347564280204]
  We propose a new Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation (AUR) framework. AUR consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model. As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T04:32:51Z)
• Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for Recommendation [76.75990595228666]
  This paper formalizes a family of exposure fairness metrics that model the problem jointly from the perspective of both the consumers and producers. Specifically, we consider group attributes for both types of stakeholders to identify and mitigate fairness concerns that go beyond individual users and items towards more systemic biases in recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T19:13:23Z)
• Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item Recommendation [57.71258289870123]
  We develop a new learning paradigm named Cross Pairwise Ranking (CPR) CPR achieves unbiased recommendation without knowing the exposure mechanism. We prove in theory that this way offsets the influence of user/item propensity on the learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T09:20:27Z)
• Deep Causal Reasoning for Recommendations [47.83224399498504]
  A new trend in recommender system research is to negate the influence of confounders from a causal perspective. We model the recommendation as a multi-cause multi-outcome (MCMO) inference problem. We show that MCMO modeling may lead to high variance due to scarce observations associated with the high-dimensional causal space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-06T15:00:01Z)
• Debiased Explainable Pairwise Ranking from Implicit Feedback [0.3867363075280543]
  We focus on the state of the art pairwise ranking model, Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR) BPR is a black box model that does not explain its outputs, thus limiting the user's trust in the recommendations. We propose a novel explainable loss function and a corresponding Matrix Factorization-based model that generates recommendations along with item-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T17:19:37Z)
• Model Selection's Disparate Impact in Real-World Deep Learning Applications [3.924854655504237]
  Algorithmic fairness has emphasized the role of biased data in automated decision outcomes. We contend that one source of such bias, human preferences in model selection, remains under-explored in terms of its role in disparate impact across demographic groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-01T16:37:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.